ON
← Back to feed
Mentions of ‘gender’ scrubbed from Queensland Office for Women website amid alleged effort to ‘dewokify’
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsConservativeyesterday

Mentions of ‘gender’ scrubbed from Queensland Office for Women website amid alleged effort to ‘dewokify’

The Queensland Office for Women has removed references to 'gender' from its website, according to former staff members who claim the Liberal National Party (LNP) government is attempting to 'dewokify' the public service. Internal emails and web archive data show multiple instances of 'gender equality' and related terms were deleted from the 'About' page, including from the mission statement and toolbar. While some mentions of 'gender equality' remain, over 20 instances of the word 'gender' were removed across the site, particularly in discussions about the gender pay gap. The minister for women, Fiona Simpson, denied the allegations, stating the updates were part of launching a new strategy for women's economic security. Former employees argued that removing 'gender' conflates it with LGBTQ+ issues and undermines efforts to address gender-based disparities.

The Queensland Office for Women has removed multiple references to the word “gender” from its official website following internal directives, according to emails and web archive records obtained by The Guardian. The changes, which include eliminating the phrase “gender equality” from key sections of the site, have sparked controversy among former employees, who claim the move reflects an attempt to “dewokify” the public service under the current Liberal National Party (LNP) government. The alterations were identified through comparisons of archived versions of the website with its current state. As of early February, the “About” page, once a central hub for information about the office’s mission, no longer includes the phrase “gender equal Queensland.” Previously, this phrase was featured prominently, appearing as the first tab on the page’s toolbar, in the opening sentence of the text, and in the first bullet point outlining the office’s role. Web archives reveal that six explicit mentions of “gender equality” or “gender equal” were deleted during the revisions. Across the entire site, over 20 instances of the word “gender” were removed, though some references to “gender equality” still appear on the homepage. Former departmental staff, speaking anonymously, allege that internal instructions tasked them with scrubbing the term “gender” from the online platform. They say they were informed that the minister for women, Fiona Simpson, found the word “too direct” and “loaded,” suggesting it carried political connotations. One employee recounted pushing back against the directive, arguing that the term was essential for accurately representing issues like the gender pay gap. “Why are we making this a queer issue?” they stated, emphasizing that the focus should remain on the disparity faced by women. In response to inquiries raised during parliamentary estimates, the department’s director general, Natalie Wilde, explained that updates to the website are part of routine efforts to enhance user experience. She noted that editorial changes to web content are handled operationally and approved through the strategic communications unit. However, critics argue these changes reflect broader ideological shifts within the government. The redesign also included altering the website’s visual branding, shifting the banner color from purple to blue, a hue associated with the LNP, and adding the slogan “delivering for Queensland.” These modifications align with the party’s branding strategy and have drawn criticism from watchdogs like the Centre for Public Integrity, whose director, Geoffrey Watson SC, has previously condemned the use of such imagery across government entities as a form of politicization. The removal of terms related to gender has reignited debates about the role of language in policy and public administration. While the government maintains that the changes are purely cosmetic and aimed at improving accessibility, former employees and opposition figures suggest otherwise. During parliamentary estimates, the shadow minister for women, Shannon Fentiman, questioned the rationale behind the edits, highlighting concerns about the implications for inclusivity and transparency. As the situation unfolds, scrutiny will likely intensify, particularly regarding how language choices influence public perception and policy outcomes. Whether these changes represent a broader trend or an isolated incident remains to be seen. For now, the Office for Women continues to operate under the new branding, with the minister reaffirming her commitment to supporting Queensland women.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

The Guardian (World) logoThe Guardian (World)IndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 65yesterday
Mentions of ‘gender’ scrubbed from Queensland Office for Women website amid alleged effort to ‘dewokify’

The Queensland Office for Women has removed references to 'gender' from its website, according to former staff members who claim the Liberal National Party (LNP) government is attempting to 'dewokify' the public service. Internal emails and web archive data show multiple instances of 'gender equality' and related terms were deleted from the 'About' page, including from the mission statement and toolbar. While some mentions of 'gender equality' remain, over 20 instances of the word 'gender' were removed across the site, particularly in discussions about the gender pay gap. The minister for women, Fiona Simpson, denied the allegations, stating the updates were part of launching a new strategy for women's economic security. Former employees argued that removing 'gender' conflates it with LGBTQ+ issues and undermines efforts to address gender-based disparities.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the removal of 'gender' terminology as an attempt by the LNP government to 'dewokify' the public service, implying a conservative stance toward gender-related policies. It highlights internal pressure from management to remove terms associated with gender equality, suggesting a de

Why factuality (85): The article cites specific examples of changes made to the Queensland Office for Women's website, including the removal of 'gender' references, and provides quotes from both former staff and the minister. It references an email and web archive to support these claims. While the primary source docume

Why objectivity (65): The article frames the issue as an attempt to 'dewokify' the public service, using emotionally charged language like 'alleged effort' and 'loaded.' It also highlights a direct contradiction between the minister's denial and the reported actions, which may reflect a biased perspective rather than pre

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories