Mental health crisis in England as children as young as SIX seek help
A report by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) reveals a significant rise in children's mental health crises in England, with a 36% overall increase in mental health-related attendances since 2019. The most dramatic growth was among children aged 6–9 years, with a 62% surge in attendances. Children are increasingly turning to Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments due to inadequate mental health resources, leading to extreme wait times, some waiting up to 12 hours or even three days. These conditions are described as unsuitable for children in mental distress, with bright lighting and noise exacerbating their anxiety. Experts warn that the situation highlights systemic failures in mental health care and call for expanded mental health facilities, including dedicated A&Es and community centers, along with increased staffing in specialized roles.
Rising numbers of children in mental health crisis have been increasingly turning up at Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments in England, according to recent data analyzed by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH). Between 2019 and 2025, the number of six to 17-year-olds attending A&E units due to mental health concerns surged by 36%. In 2025 alone, there were 75,491 attendances, compared to 55,525 in 2019. Some of the most dramatic increases occurred among younger children, particularly those aged six to nine, whose attendances jumped by 62%. The situation has led to prolonged waits for treatment, with over 6,200 children, around 8% of all attendees, waiting more than 12 hours in A&E. In some cases, children spent multiple days in emergency departments before receiving appropriate care. These delays have raised serious concerns among medical professionals, who argue that A&E units are ill-suited for treating children experiencing mental health crises. Dr. Sam Jones, an RCPCH officer for mental health, emphasized that behind each statistic lies a real-life story of a child in distress and a family struggling to find adequate support. She stated that emergency departments, while essential for immediate care, were never intended to serve as long-term solutions for children in mental health crisis. “This is a national crisis that will only get worse without urgent intervention,” she warned. The RCPCH’s findings highlight a broader systemic issue: a lack of community-based mental health resources and crisis support. Many families, unable to access timely assistance, resort to A&E as a last option. According to the analysis of NHS England data, some children became aggressive or exhibited challenging behavior during their stays, complicating their care further. Doctors noted that these cases often involve children brought in by families, carers, or even the police. Dr. Mark Buchanan, of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, described the trend as children and young people “ending up in A&E by default.” He stressed that they require care in environments specifically designed to meet their needs. Gemma Byrne of the mental health charity Mind echoed this sentiment, calling the current system “unacceptable.” She pointed out that children often receive support only when they are deemed “unwell enough,” which means critical help is delayed until a crisis point is reached. Efforts to address the growing demand include the government’s planned publication of a new mental health strategy later in the summer. However, officials have highlighted existing initiatives, such as the expansion of mental health teams in schools and the creation of over 150 new mental health hubs located in community spaces like libraries and banks. A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Social Care reiterated that “no child should have to reach crisis point before getting the support they need.” Despite these measures, experts remain concerned. Claire Evans of Anna Freud, a mental health charity focused on children and families, called the statistics “deeply concerning.” She urged the government to ensure the new strategy prioritizes children’s mental health and invests in accessible, community-based support. “The new mental health strategy must place children at its heart,” she said. As the government prepares to unveil its strategy, the pressure mounts to overhaul the current system. With more children arriving in A&E in mental health crisis and waiting for extended periods, the need for comprehensive reform has never been clearer. The challenge now is to translate awareness into action, ensuring that children receive the support they need before reaching crisis point.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
NHS doctors in England report a 36% increase in children and young people aged six to 17 attending A&E units due to mental health crises between 2019 and 2025. The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health analyzed data obtained via the Freedom of Information Act, revealing 75,491 attendances in 2025 compared to 55,525 in 2019. The surge includes cases involving self-harm, eating disorders, and emotional distress, with some children waiting over 12 hours in emergency departments. Doctors emphasize that A&E is not the appropriate setting for mental health crises and highlight a lack of community-based support. The government has acknowledged the issue and plans to address it, while experts call for improved funding, staff training, and alternative support systems to prevent further strain on emergency services.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data and expert opinions without overtly favoring any political ideology. It reports on a growing public health concern and includes statements from multiple stakeholders including medical professionals, government representatives, and advocacy groups. While the issue is
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports a 36% increase in mental health-related A&E attendances for children aged 6-17 between 2019 and 2025, citing data from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health and NHS England. It provides specific numbers and mentions the challenges faced by children in emerg
Why objectivity (80): The tone is generally neutral, presenting facts about the rising trend and the strain on A&E services. However, phrases like 'vulnerable children and young people' and 'desperate families left with nowhere to turn' introduce a slightly empathetic tone, though not overtly biased.
A report by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) reveals a significant rise in children's mental health crises in England, with a 36% overall increase in mental health-related attendances since 2019. The most dramatic growth was among children aged 6–9 years, with a 62% surge in attendances. Children are increasingly turning to Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments due to inadequate mental health resources, leading to extreme wait times, some waiting up to 12 hours or even three days. These conditions are described as unsuitable for children in mental distress, with bright lighting and noise exacerbating their anxiety. Experts warn that the situation highlights systemic failures in mental health care and call for expanded mental health facilities, including dedicated A&Es and community centers, along with increased staffing in specialized roles.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic failure of the government and healthcare system, emphasizing the inadequacy of current services and calling for expansion of mental health infrastructure. While it cites expert opinions and data, the tone leans toward criticizing government action and under
Why factuality (80): The article correctly states a 36% increase in mental health-related attendances and highlights the rise among 6-9 year olds. It references the RCPCH and NHS England data, aligning with the BBC report. However, it omits some details such as the 8% wait time figure and the mention of government plans
Why objectivity (75): The language is emotionally charged with phrases like 'deeply alarming', 'national crisis', and 'damning indictment of a failing system', which suggest a critical stance toward the healthcare system. This introduces a more subjective tone compared to the BBC article.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.