ON
← Back to feed
Men control 60% of household finances. Here’s why they shouldn’t
Australia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives3 hr. ago

Men control 60% of household finances. Here’s why they shouldn’t

The article discusses the ongoing trend in Australia where men continue to hold significant control over household finances, despite increasing financial independence among women. It highlights that although women are achieving higher education levels and entering the workforce in greater numbers, traditional gender roles persist in decision-making within relationships. Women are increasingly financially literate and capable of managing wealth effectively, yet they often defer to men for major financial decisions. This dynamic is attributed to men's greater risk-taking behavior, such as higher engagement in cryptocurrency and gambling, compared to women. Research indicates that women's conservative investment approach leads to better long-term returns, as demonstrated by a study showing female investors outperformed males by 40 basis points. The author argues that men are missing out on the value of women's financial perspectives.

Men control 60% of household finances. Here’s why they shouldn’t In Australian households, men continue to dominate financial decision-making, with 60% of major financial responsibilities falling under their purview. This pattern persists despite significant strides made by women in education, employment, and financial independence. According to a recent analysis, Australian women are now attending university at unprecedented rates, leading to higher earning potential compared to previous generations. As a result, their superannuation balances are projected to provide better retirement security. Despite these advancements, traditional gender roles in financial matters remain largely unchanged, with women still deferring to men for guidance on major financial choices. Dionne Gain, a professional in the male-dominated finance sector, has observed this trend firsthand over her decade-long career. She notes that while women are increasingly confident in managing household budgets, with over 55% reporting responsibility for tracking expenses, fewer than 20% are involved in investment decisions related to stocks, bonds, or mutual funds. This discrepancy highlights a persistent gap in how financial authority is distributed within heterosexual partnerships, even as women contribute more significantly to household income. One key factor behind this imbalance lies in behavioral differences between genders. Research indicates that men tend to exhibit a stronger appetite for risk when dealing with money. They are more than twice as likely to invest in cryptocurrency, a market widely regarded by economists as potentially resembling a Ponzi scheme due to its extreme volatility. Additionally, men are disproportionately represented among gamblers, with studies showing they are twice as likely to develop gambling addiction compared to women. These tendencies manifest in investment behavior as well. The stock market, historically associated with masculine traits such as competitiveness and risk-taking, sees men trading more frequently than women. In contrast, women demonstrate a greater capacity for patience and consistency in long-term investing. A study conducted by US-based Fidelity Investments analyzed data from 5.2 million accounts spanning nine years, from 2011 to 2020. It revealed that female investors achieved returns that were 40 basis points higher than their male counterparts, underscoring the value of a more measured approach to financial planning. Despite these findings, the same patterns persist in everyday financial dynamics. Last year, YouGov polling confirmed that while women manage household budgets, they are rarely included in discussions about investment strategies. This exclusion is particularly striking given that women now contribute more to household finances than ever before. The disconnect suggests that cultural norms and ingrained expectations continue to shape how financial power is allocated within families. To explore the root causes of this phenomenon, researchers from the University of Essex conducted a comparative study examining bargaining power in heterosexual couples across Australia, Germany, and the United States. Their findings suggest that traditional gender roles still heavily influence who holds decision-making authority in financial matters. In Australian households, men retain disproportionate influence, even as women gain more economic autonomy. The study underscores the need for intentional efforts to shift these dynamics, ensuring that both partners' perspectives are valued in financial planning. As societal attitudes evolve, it becomes increasingly clear that shared financial responsibility should not be dictated by outdated stereotypes. Recognizing and leveraging the strengths each partner brings to the table, including women's demonstrated ability to make steady, informed investment decisions, can lead to more resilient and equitable financial outcomes for all family members. The path forward requires conscious effort to challenge entrenched norms and foster collaborative approaches to managing household finances.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (5)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentProgressive3 hr. ago
Men control 60% of household finances. Here’s why they shouldn’t

The article discusses the persistent gender gap in financial decision-making within households, noting that men still dominate major financial choices despite increasing financial independence among women. It highlights historical trends where women were less involved in financial matters and contrasts this with current data showing improved financial literacy and performance among women. The piece references studies indicating that men are more inclined toward risky investments like cryptocurrency and gambling, while women demonstrate greater patience and consistency in long-term investing, leading to better returns. Despite these findings, the author observes that women continue to defer to men for financial advice, suggesting missed opportunities for collaborative financial planning.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue of gender disparity in financial decision-making as a systemic problem requiring change, emphasizing women's superior long-term investment outcomes and calling for greater recognition of their financial expertise. While it presents factual data, the tone leans left by de

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentProgressive3 hr. ago
Men control 60% of household finances. Here’s why they shouldn’t

The article discusses the ongoing trend in Australia where men continue to hold significant control over household finances, despite increasing financial independence among women. It highlights that although women are achieving higher education levels and entering the workforce in greater numbers, traditional gender roles persist in decision-making within relationships. Women are increasingly financially literate and capable of managing wealth effectively, yet they often defer to men for major financial decisions. This dynamic is attributed to men's greater risk-taking behavior, such as higher engagement in cryptocurrency and gambling, compared to women. Research indicates that women's conservative investment approach leads to better long-term returns, as demonstrated by a study showing female investors outperformed males by 40 basis points. The author argues that men are missing out on the value of women's financial perspectives.

Bias read (Progressive): The article critiques traditional gender roles in financial decision-making and emphasizes the advantages of women's approaches to investing, suggesting a shift toward valuing women's financial input. This framing aligns with progressive views on gender equality and challenges conventional norms, as

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories