Germany-Liveblog: Peaceful protest in front of the Congress of the Generation Germany
About 50 people peacefully protested outside the second federal congress of 'Generation Deutschland,' a youth organization affiliated with the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), in Magdeburg, Germany. The protest occurred as hundreds of attendees waited for entry to the event at the Old Theatre Magdeburg. The congress aimed to elect a new board member to replace Kevin Dorow, who was removed from office after controversy over his remarks referencing Nazi-era rhetoric. Dorow had used a phrase associated with the Hitler Youth, leading to investigations against him. Additionally, the congress discussed a proposal advocating for more moderate positions toward the European Union, including open internal borders. Meanwhile, AfD state leader Martin Reichardt opened the congress with provocative and vulgar speech, criticizing the European Union and calling for a return to 'real' German values. He referred to the EU as a 'rotten, lazy Asiatic' receiving money from the Friedrich-Ebert Foundation and claimed the EU's leadership was 'a swollen, intersectional flirt' with smeared lipstick. His speech was met with enthusiastic applause from delegates.
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
German Christian churches are publicly opposing the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which is leading in polls ahead of state elections in Saxony-Anhalt. Church leaders, including Bishop Gerhard Feige, emphasize values like love, dialogue, and human dignity, urging voters to make conscious choices. The AfD, which the German intelligence agency labels as right-wing extremist, has criticized churches for receiving state funds and promoting policies such as climate action and gender equality. The party also seeks financial accountability from churches for housing refugees and wants to cut funding to institutions like the Protestant Academy of Saxony-Anhalt. Despite low religious affiliation rates in the state, churches see themselves as defenders of democracy against the AfD's agenda.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced portrayal of the conflict between the AfD and the Christian churches, highlighting both the AfD's criticisms of the churches and the churches' defense of democratic values. It does not overtly favor one side over the other, though it emphasizes the significance of the
Why factuality (90): The article provides specific details such as the location (Magdeburg), the involvement of both Catholic and Protestant churches, the mention of Bishop Gerhard Feige, and the political context regarding the AfD's influence in Saxony-Anhalt. These facts align with the cross-source consensus, though s
Why objectivity (95): The article presents the situation in a largely neutral manner, focusing on the actions of the churches and the political context without overtly favoring any particular viewpoint. It avoids emotional language and maintains a balanced tone.
n-tvIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 703 days ago
The article reports on the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party's potential success in the upcoming state election in Saxony-Anhalt, describing their rise as 'im Höhenflug' (on a high flight). However, it also notes that a counter-movement is gaining momentum, suggesting growing opposition to the AfD. The piece highlights the political contestation around the election, which could have significant implications for the party's future. While the AfD is positioned as a rising force, the emergence of a strong opposition indicates increasing political tensions in the region.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the AfD's potential gains and the emerging counter-movement without overtly favoring either side. It frames the situation as a balanced contest between two forces, though it does emphasize the AfD's current trajectory more prominently. The lack of clear editorializing or sl
Why factuality (90): This article closely mirrors the primary source document, discussing the AfD's potential governance in Saxony-Anhalt and linking it to broader historical and political contexts. It accurately represents the concerns raised in the primary source, including the comparison to the NSDAP and the role of
Why objectivity (70): While the article presents a strong critique of the AfD, it remains relatively neutral in tone compared to others. It frames the issue in terms of democratic values and historical responsibility, maintaining a level of balance despite its critical stance.
BildIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 804 days ago
The article features an interview with Paul Ronzheimer, a member of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party, discussing his surprise strategy ahead of the upcoming state election in Saxony-Anhalt. Ronzheimer highlights specific tactics or announcements he believes will catch opponents off guard. The piece focuses on political maneuvering within the AfD and its implications for the election campaign.
Bias read (Conservative): The article centers on a prominent figure from the AfD, a far-right political party in Germany known for its nationalist and anti-immigration stance. The framing emphasizes strategic surprises and political positioning typical of right-wing discourse. There is no balanced presentation of opposing or
Why factuality (85): The article discusses the upcoming election in Saxony-Anhalt and quotes Paul Ronzheimer regarding his surprise at the AfD's performance. However, it does not address the primary source document about migration policy debates in the German parliament. The content is unrelated to the SPD, CDU, Greens,
Why objectivity (80): The article presents Ronzheimer's views neutrally but focuses on the AfD's political rise rather than presenting multiple perspectives. It avoids overt bias but centers on the AfD narrative.
Focus OnlineIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 804 days ago
A former bank robber has announced his candidacy for the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, according to a report by FOCUS online. The article highlights the individual's criminal past and his decision to run for political office within the AfD, which is known for its far-right platform. This development has sparked discussions about the party's appeal to individuals with controversial backgrounds and raises questions about the intersection of crime and politics in Germany. The report does not provide additional details about the candidate's current activities or specific policies he intends to promote.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the candidacy of a former bank robber within the context of the AfD, a far-right political party. The emphasis on the individual's criminal history suggests a narrative that aligns with the AfD's broader image of challenging mainstream political norms and appealing to voters who反感
Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the WIR-Festival in Halle, including its purpose and activities. It aligns with the primary source document by emphasizing community, solidarity, and open society. Some details about the campaign are specific but not contradicting the main facts.
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral and informative, discussing the festival's goals and organizers without taking sides. However, there is a slight leaning towards supporting the values promoted by the festival.
Focus OnlineIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 754 days ago
The article discusses a visit to the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party, focusing on their rhetoric and the reactions it provokes. The title suggests a critical perspective toward the AfD, implying frustration with their messages. The piece likely explores the party's positions, public perception, and potential impact on German politics. It may include interviews or observations from the visit, highlighting controversial statements made by AfD members.
Bias read (Progressive): The title implies criticism of the AfD, suggesting a negative framing of their views. This indicates a left-leaning perspective, as the AfD is generally seen as a right-wing party in Germany. The phrasing 'Muss ich mir nicht länger anhören' ('I don't have to listen anymore') suggests disapproval of,
Why factuality (85): The article describes an incident where activist group Femen disrupted a speech by AfD politician Beatrix von Storch. It reports the event accurately without embellishment, though it doesn’t provide full context about the activists’ motivations or broader implications.
Why objectivity (75): The article remains neutral in describing the event but may subtly frame the disruption as controversial or provocative, potentially influencing reader interpretation. There is some editorializing in the choice of focus.
An AfD politician in Saxony-Anhalt, Hans-Thomas Tillschneider, defended the presence of a Russian military mug in his election office, stating it was a gift from a 2023 or 2024 trip to Russia and that he did not intend to remove it. Journalist Paul Ronzheimer questioned the display, noting the Russian army's role in invading Ukraine and conducting a hybrid war against Germany. Tillschneider responded by emphasizing that it was just a gift and that 'it is not our war,' while also distancing himself from any direct association with the Russian military. Ronzheimer criticized Tillschneider's behavior, claiming he attempted to block the publication of a video documenting the incident. Tillschneider, who holds a leadership position within the AfD, which is classified as a right-wing extremist organization by Germany’s intelligence agency, has had previous controversies involving his stance toward Russia, including a 2022 trip to Russia that was later abandoned after the party distanced itself.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Tillschneider's defense of the Russian military mug as a matter of personal possession rather than political alignment, using language that downplays the significance of the item in the context of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The emphasis on Tillschneider's claim that 'it is not
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a specific incident involving an AfD politician and a Russian military mug found in his office. It cites direct quotes from both the politician and the journalist, providing context about the mug's origin and the political implications. The reporting aligns with the cross-sour
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the perspectives of both the AfD politician and the journalist, though it leans slightly toward the journalist's viewpoint by highlighting the controversy and the politician's attempt to block the publication. The tone carries some editorial weight in emphasizing the 'freedom of
Die ZeitIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 704 days ago
On August 29, 2026, the AfD's youth organization, Generation Deutschland (GD), held a federal congress in Magdeburg to determine its stance on European politics and distance itself from the mother party's strict anti-Euro position. GD leader Jean-Pascal Hohm emphasized the need to fix flaws in the Euro system rather than pursue a German exit, rejecting both Euro withdrawal and leaving the Schengen area. The event was expected to include candidate Ulrich Siegmund for the Saxony-Anhalt state election. With around 480 participants, guests, and journalists invited, police estimated approximately 300 GD members attending. The GD, reformed from the previously independent Junge Alternative (JA), aims to influence the AfD's upcoming program development. Protests against the congress were limited but anticipated to grow.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the GD congress, highlighting both the internal divisions within the AfD over Europe policy and the external protests against the event. It reports on GD's efforts to moderate positions while still aligning with the broader AfD agenda. There is no overtly l
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a meeting of the AfD youth organization 'Generation Deutschland' in Magdeburg, detailing discussions about European policy and the party's program. It references quotes from officials like Jean-Pascal Hohm and mentions the expected attendance. These details align with the prim
Why objectivity (70): The article presents information from the perspective of the AfD and its youth organization, focusing on their positions and actions. There is some bias in the portrayal of the AfD's stance on European issues, particularly in emphasizing their divergence from the mother party. The tone leans towards
Die WeltIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 704 days ago
The article reports on the state election in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, where the Social Democratic Party (SPD), led by Minister President Ulbricht, faces challenges from the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), represented by Chancellor Merkel's faction. The headline suggests a direct challenge from SPD leader Schwesig against CDU figures like Merz, indicating a competitive race between left-wing and right-wing parties. The piece highlights the political contestation around governance and policy priorities in the region.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the election as a confrontation between Schwesig (left-wing SPD) and Merz (right-wing CDU). The emphasis on Schwesig's 'Kampfansage' (challenge) positions her as a proactive figure against established conservative leaders, suggesting a narrative favoring progressive leadership. No
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the state election in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and mentions Schwesig’s criticism of Merz and others. However, it lacks specific details such as poll numbers, candidate names, or specific policy positions, which limits full factual completeness.
Why objectivity (70): The title uses emotionally charged language like 'Kampfansage' (challenge) which implies conflict. The article appears to frame Schwesig as taking a stand against Merz, potentially favoring her position slightly.
Der SpiegelIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 704 days ago
The article titled 'FDP in Sachsen-Anhalt: Erste Bewährungsprobe für Wolfgang Kubicki' appears to be an advertisement for SPIEGEL+ subscription services rather than a news article. The content includes promotional material for digital subscriptions, pricing options, and login information, but does not provide any substantive news content related to the FDP party or Wolfgang Kubicki's role in Saxony-Anhalt.
Bias read (Center): The article does not present any biased framing or editorialized content. It is purely promotional material for a subscription service and does not engage with the political subject matter of the FDP or Wolfgang Kubicki in a slanted manner.
Why factuality (85): This article mirrors the primary source document by repeating the same subscription pricing and promotion details. It accurately represents the subscription model but lacks specific content about the political topic discussed.
Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a promotional tone, focusing on subscription offers rather than providing balanced coverage of the political story. This creates a bias towards promoting digital access over delivering impartial news.
SternIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 653 days ago
The article discusses the projects and policies proposed by the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), a right-wing political party in Germany, specifically within the state of Saxony-Anhalt. It highlights the AfD's approach to governance and their initiatives, which are described as radical compared to traditional political strategies. The piece explores the implications of these proposals on regional politics and public policy in Saxony-Anhalt.
Bias read (Conservative): The article focuses on the AfD, a right-wing party known for its controversial and radical positions in German politics. The framing emphasizes the 'radical' nature of their projects, suggesting a critical perspective toward their policies. This implies a leaning towards the right, as the content is
Why factuality (85): This article covers the AfD's rising popularity and the emergence of opposition movements, providing context about the upcoming election. It references the AfD's growth and the increasing resistance, which aligns with the broader narrative in the primary source. The factual claims are supported by c
Why objectivity (65): The article presents a balanced view of the situation, acknowledging both the AfD's rise and the growing opposition. However, it uses phrases like 'Gegenbewegung nimmt Fahrt auf' (opposition gains momentum), which may subtly favor the anti-AfD movement, affecting neutrality.
Junge FreiheitIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 656 days ago
The article reports that schools in Brandenburg, Germany, have banned AfD (Alternative für Deutschland) branded pens, labeling them as 'propaganda.' The ban reflects broader concerns over the AfD's extremist rhetoric and its influence on students. The AfD is a far-right political party known for its anti-immigration stance and controversial policies. This action by school authorities highlights tensions between educational institutions and political groups perceived as promoting divisive ideologies. The decision underscores efforts to maintain a politically neutral learning environment.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the AfD as a political group engaged in 'propaganda,' which aligns with a conservative perspective that views the party as ideologically extreme. The emphasis on banning such materials in schools suggests a right-leaning interpretation of the issue, portraying the AfD as a threat.
Why factuality (85): The article reports on an interview with AfD leader Chrupalla, discussing climate change. It includes direct quotes and contextualizes his comments within the broader political landscape. The factual claims are supported by the interview itself and are presented in a manner consistent with the prima
Why objectivity (65): The tone is critical of the AfD's stance on climate issues, using language that implies skepticism toward their views. This subtle bias affects the objectivity of the report.
Focus OnlineIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 602 days ago
The article reports that Christian Democrat politician Merz warned in an ARD broadcast about the potential risks of an AfD-led government in Saxony-Anhalt. The warning comes amid growing concerns over the political landscape in the region, where the AfD has gained significant support. Merz emphasized the importance of maintaining stability and democratic values, suggesting that an AfD government could lead to negative consequences for the state and its residents. The piece highlights the increasing polarization in German politics and the challenges faced by regional governments.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Merz's warning without overtly endorsing or condemning the AfD's position. It focuses on the implications of an AfD-led government rather than taking a clear ideological stance. While the AfD is portrayed as a potential threat, the article does not frame the issue in a strongly左
Why factuality (85): The article reports on Merz's warning against an AfD government in Saxony-Anhalt, referencing a broader political context. It does not directly reference the primary source document but aligns with the general narrative of AfD's growing influence. The factual claims are supported by current events a
Why objectivity (60): The tone is alarmist and critical of the AfD, using emotionally charged language such as 'blaue Welle' (blue wave), implying a significant political shift. This reflects a clear bias towards opposing the AfD, which affects objectivity.
The article reports on the opening speech by Martin Reichardt, the leader of the AfD in Saxony-Anhalt, at the party's federal congress. Reichardt used vulgar and inflammatory rhetoric, calling the state 'a lazy Asian who receives money from the Friedrich-Ebert Foundation and regularly drinks' and mocking the 'International' as 'lalling'. He promised to take away 'care rights' from the 'rotten Left' and called for reclaiming Germany on September 6th. The article also covers the election of Tim Demuth as a new member of the board of 'Generation Deutschland', noting his ties to international right-wing groups and his controversial statement about professionalism involving discipline and style. It mentions that former member Kevin Dorow was banned for using a slogan associated with the Hitler Youth.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the AfD's actions and rhetoric in a manner that aligns with right-wing ideology. Reichardt's speech uses derogatory language against the state and the 'International', which is typically associated with leftist policies. The emphasis on reclaiming Germany and attacking the 'Left'
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the speech by AfD leader Martin Reichardt at the party’s congress, including his controversial remarks. It aligns with the primary source document from FAZ, which focuses on live reporting and includes similar content about the AfD’s activities. However, it does not
Why objectivity (60): The tone is somewhat inflammatory, using strong language like 'vulgäre Rede' and emphasizing the provocative nature of Reichardt’s speech. While it provides factual details, it frames the event in a way that may be seen as biased toward portraying the AfD in a negative light.
Die WeltIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 83Objective 684 days ago
The article reports on the state election in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, where the Social Democratic Party (SPD), led by Minister President Ulbricht, faces challenges from the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), represented by Chancellor Merkel's faction. The headline suggests a direct challenge from SPD leader Schwesig against CDU figures like Merz, indicating a competitive race between left-wing and right-wing parties. The piece highlights the political contestation around governance and policy priorities in the region.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the election as a confrontation between Schwesig (left-wing SPD) and Merz (right-wing CDU). The emphasis on Schwesig's 'Kampfansage' (challenge) positions her as a proactive figure against established conservative leaders, suggesting a narrative favoring progressive leadership. No
Why factuality (83): This article mirrors the content of item 0, reporting on the same event with similar level of detail. It also lacks specific data but aligns with the general consensus found in other articles.
Why objectivity (68): Similar to item 0, the title suggests a confrontational stance by Schwesig. The tone leans slightly towards presenting Schwesig as being in opposition to Merz, which may introduce a subtle bias.
Lilli Wouhbé, a recent law graduate, discusses concerns about societal apathy and the lack of clear political vision in Germany. She criticizes the vague rhetoric around economic growth without specifying goals such as innovation or sustainability. Wouhbé expresses concern over the potential rise of the AfD in Saxony-Anhalt, noting the risks posed by a party labeled as 'securely extremist' by the state's constitutional protection agency. She highlights the need for inclusive governance and better support structures like childcare to enable more people to work. Wouhbé also comments on the misconception that Germans do not work enough, emphasizing unpaid care work and the need for systemic support rather than criticism.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced perspective on political issues, including critiques of current policies and concerns about the AfD’s influence. The framing remains neutral, avoiding overt ideological bias while discussing both societal challenges and political dynamics.
Why factuality (80): The article describes peaceful protests outside the AfD youth congress, including details about the event and participants. It cites the number of protesters and the nature of the protest, which aligns with publicly available information. While it does not reference the primary source document, the
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the protest in a neutral manner, describing both the demonstrators and the attendees of the congress. However, it subtly emphasizes the significance of the event and the presence of dissenting voices, which may imply a slight bias towards the protesters.
n-tvIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 705 days ago
The article reports that Germans have clearly rejected the restructuring plans proposed by the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party. The rejection indicates widespread disapproval among the public regarding the direction and policies the AfD intends to pursue. This reaction highlights the challenges the AfD faces in gaining broader acceptance within German society. The article suggests that the party's proposed changes have not resonated well with voters, potentially impacting its political influence.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on public opinion toward the AfD's restructuring plans without overtly favoring any side. It does not include biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing that would indicate a clear ideological lean.
Why factuality (80): The article cites public opposition to AfD restructuring plans based on survey data, though no specific source is named. It aligns with cross-source consensus that there is public rejection of AfD policies. The reporting is relatively factual given the lack of primary documents.
Why objectivity (70): While the article presents a clear stance on public opinion, it frames the issue as a 'klar' (clear) rejection without providing nuanced perspectives. This leans slightly toward a political bias, though not overtly.
The article discusses the election campaign in Saxony-Anhalt, focusing on Christian Democrat candidate Sven Schulze who is trailing behind the far-right AfD party. The piece highlights Schulze's efforts to counter the 'blue wave', a reference to the potential surge of the AfD, which has put him at a disadvantage. The tone suggests skepticism about whether voters will respond to Schulze's arguments, implying challenges in his campaign against the rising influence of the AfD.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the AfD as a significant threat ('blaue Welle') and implies that Schulze's position is weaker, which aligns with a left-leaning perspective that often views far-right parties negatively. The focus on Schulze's struggle against the AfD suggests a narrative that favors established,
Why factuality (80): This article discusses the election campaign in Saxony-Anhalt, focusing on Schulze's position relative to the AfD. While it provides context about the election, it lacks detailed information from the primary source document. The facts are presented within the scope of the election race, which is rel
Why objectivity (65): The article maintains a somewhat neutral stance but leans slightly towards supporting the CDU candidate, Schulze, through phrasing like 'gegen die blaue Welle', suggesting a preference for traditional parties over the AfD. This subtle bias reduces objectivity.
Focus OnlineIndependentConservativeFactual 80Objective 653 days ago
The article reports on a statement by the AfD Youth wing calling for mass deportations, which has been met with celebration by Siegmund, a member of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party. The piece highlights the growing influence of the AfD's youth organization within the party and its increasingly radical stance on immigration policies. It suggests that the call for mass deportations reflects broader trends within the AfD's platform, emphasizing nationalist and anti-immigration rhetoric. The article does not provide additional context or counterpoints regarding the implications of such policies.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the AfD Youth's call for mass deportations as a significant and celebrated action, using language that aligns with far-right nationalist ideology. The focus on celebrating Siegmund's support for these policies reinforces a right-leaning perspective, emphasizing the legitimacy and激
Why factuality (80): This article reports on an Insa poll showing the AfD remains the strongest party, with the CDU declining. It aligns with the primary source document’s focus on live reporting and includes data from a reputable polling organization. The facts are presented clearly and without embellishment.
Why objectivity (65): While the article presents factual data, it frames the results in a way that highlights the decline of the CDU and the continued strength of the AfD. There is a subtle implication that the AfD’s rise is significant, though this is standard in political reporting.
HandelsblattIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 80Objective 655 days ago
The article reports on a television discussion where politician Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer (AKK) criticizes her former colleague, Friedrich Merz, for making controversial remarks during a debate. The piece highlights the tension between Merz and AKK within the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), focusing on their differing approaches to political strategy and communication. It suggests that Merz’s comments were seen as provocative by some within his party, while others view them as necessary honesty. The article frames the situation as a reflection of internal divisions within the CDU ahead of upcoming political challenges.
Bias read (Progressive): The article emphasizes Merz's controversial remarks as being 'what few want to hear,' implying criticism of his approach and suggesting that his views are at odds with mainstream consensus. This framing aligns more closely with left-leaning perspectives that value transparency and challenge populist
Why factuality (80): The article discusses a TV discussion where Merz makes statements that few want to hear. While it provides some insight into Merz's public comments, it lacks specifics about the context of the discussion or the nature of his remarks.
Why objectivity (65): The title uses provocative language ('sagt, was die Wenigsten hören wollen') suggesting Merz made controversial or unpopular statements. This framing may imply a negative view of Merz without providing balanced context.
The article discusses the upcoming state election in Saxony-Anhalt, where the far-right AfD party could potentially form a government. It frames this development within a broader context of declining liberal values across Europe, linking it to historical shifts such as the fall of the Soviet Union and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The piece criticizes the tendency to blame East Germans ('Ossis') for societal issues while suggesting that the problem lies in the lack of viable solutions from mainstream political forces. It argues that populist parties like AfD appeal to those who feel marginalized by liberal policies, but notes that these parties offer no real political answers. The author suggests that the failure of traditional liberalism to address modern challenges is the core issue.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the rise of AfD as part of a larger trend of declining liberal values and critiques the failure of mainstream politics to provide solutions. While it acknowledges the popularity of populist parties, it emphasizes their lack of substantive policy alternatives and positions them as诉
Why factuality (80): The article explores the legality of civil disobedience in response to the AfD, drawing parallels to historical events. It references the primary source document indirectly, particularly regarding the timing of the AfD's party congress. The factual claims are grounded in legal and ethical arguments,
Why objectivity (60): The tone is strongly pro-civil disobedience, suggesting that resisting the AfD is a moral duty. This ideological framing introduces a bias, making the article less objective in its presentation of the issue.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Germany
