I can only comment on what I saw.

Minister of Defense Tomo Medved addressed criticism over comments made by SDSS leader Milorad Pupovc during the commemoration of the Battle of Krbava (Oluja) in Knin, stating he can only comment on official parts of the event he was responsible for. In response to questions about why no one from the government condemned the remarks, which included expressions of hatred and calls for violence, Medved emphasized his presence throughout the stadium and stated he could not comment on anything he did not witness or hear. During a press conference, Medved reiterated that while he and other officials involved in organizing the event would comment on the official portion, covering everything from the dawn ceremony to the mass and laying of wreaths, he could not address activities occurring outside this framework. He stressed that they were only commenting on what they had organized and witnessed, not on matters beyond their control. He noted that he had not been able to monitor media reports regarding events in Knin because the commemorations continued after the central celebration. Medved described the upcoming days as part of an "extremely content-rich week," focused on supporting activities and dignified observance of the anniversary. The schedule included programs in Slunj, followed by events in Glini the next day. When asked about a Serbian hacker recently detained for infiltrating multiple information systems of state bodies and companies in Croatia, Medved confirmed knowledge of the case but declined to provide further details due to ongoing investigations. He praised the country’s security and intelligence system for its vigilant monitoring and protection of national interests, adding that he could not comment further while the process was still underway. The incident has sparked debate over the role of public figures in political discourse and the boundaries of acceptable speech within democratic societies. While some have called for stronger condemnation of inflammatory rhetoric, others argue that such statements should be left to judicial processes rather than immediate political backlash. Medved's stance reflects a broader trend among Croatian officials who emphasize adherence to legal frameworks and avoid direct confrontation with political opponents. The controversy surrounding Pupovc’s remarks highlights the tensions that can arise during national commemorations, especially when political leaders engage in provocative language. While the official ceremonies are designed to honor historical memory and promote unity, the margins of these events often become arenas for ideological clashes. Medved’s insistence on focusing only on the officially sanctioned aspects of the event underscores a desire to maintain order and prevent the disruption of planned proceedings. As the commemorations continue, the situation remains under scrutiny, both domestically and internationally. Observers will be watching how the government balances its commitment to free expression with its responsibility to uphold social cohesion and legal norms. The outcome of the ongoing investigation into the hacker’s activities may also influence the broader discussion around cybersecurity and national defense. For now, the focus remains on the unfolding events in Knin and the responses from those in positions of authority.