The doctor: 'Kekin abuses parliamentary immunity and spreads falsehoods'

Telegram.hrIndependentConservativeyesterday

Poliklinika Medikol odbacila je tvrdnje Ivane Kekin i njezine stranke 'Možemo' da su sedam tužbi koje su podnijeli protiv zastupnice SLAPP tužbe, odnosno postupci koji se koriste za potiskivanje javne kritike. Medikol tvrdi da su tužbe jedini način za reagiranje na kontinuirano iznošenje neistina i prozivanja, jer Kekin ima saborski imunitet. Tvrtka navodi da zakonska zaštita od SLAPP tužbi odnosi se na novinare, znanstvenike i civilno društvo, a ne na političare. Medikol insistira da su tužbe podnesene radi zaštite svojeg ugleda i pacijenata, a iznosi zahtjeva su temeljeni sudskom praksom. U reakciji se naglašava da Medikol nije dio političkih sukoba, već traži zaštitu od lažnih tvrdnji.

Bias read (Conservative): Artikel koristi okvir koji podstiče zaštitu privatnih tvrtki pred političarima, posebno onima koji imaju imunitet. Naglasuje se da su tužbe nužne za zaštitu ugleda tvrtke i pacijenata, dok se političari smatraju neprimjenjivima za zaštitu od SLAPP tužbi. Okvir je sklon pravilima koji omogućuju privu

tportalIndependentConservativeyesterday

The private clinic Medikol has rejected claims by MP Ivana Kekin of the Možemo party that the civil lawsuits filed against her are SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) suits. Medikol states these lawsuits are a legal attempt to protect the clinic’s reputation due to what they describe as systematic dissemination of falsehoods by Kekin. They argue that civil lawsuits are the only way a private entity can respond to public statements made by a parliamentary representative who enjoys immunity. In their statement, Medikol emphasizes that Kekin is not protected under the Law on Protection of Individuals Involved in Public Activities, which was designed to shield journalists, artists, scientists, and NGOs from unfounded lawsuits. Instead, Kekin, as a politician with parliamentary immunity, is being targeted through these lawsuits aimed at safeguarding Medikol’s reputation.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the situation as a legitimate defense of Medikol's reputation against what it describes as false statements by a politician. It presents Medikol's perspective without balancing it with Kekin's viewpoint, implying that the lawsuits are justified rather than potentially abusive. The

Index.hrIndependentConservativeyesterday

The private clinic Medikol has responded to statements made by parliamentary representative Ivana Kekin of the Možemo party, who claimed that Medikol had filed seven lawsuits against her, which she described as SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) suits aimed at silencing her due to her investigations into the clinic's business practices with the state. Medikol denied these claims, stating that the lawsuits are civil actions intended to protect their reputation from what they describe as false allegations. They argue that Kekin continues to manipulate the narrative by repeating old falsehoods and presenting new ones, and that the lawsuits were filed in response to systematic and continuous dissemination of misinformation. Medikol emphasized that they are not part of any political campaign and remain focused on patient care and medical services.

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents Medikol's perspective, emphasizing their defense against accusations of SLAPP lawsuits and framing Kekin's actions as manipulative and based on false information. The language used suggests a defensive stance towards Medikol's legal actions while portraying Kekin's claims as unf

N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveyesterday

The private clinic Medikol has responded to claims made by MP Ivana Kekin, who accused them of using 'SLAPP lawsuits' against her. Medikol denies these allegations, stating that the seven civil lawsuits they filed against Kekin are not SLAPPs but necessary legal actions to address repeated false statements and defamation by Kekin in public spaces. The clinic emphasizes that Kekin, as a protected parliamentary figure, is entitled to immunity, but this does not exempt her from accountability for spreading misinformation. Medikol argues that their lawsuits aim to protect their reputation and ensure accurate information, particularly regarding medical issues affecting cancer patients.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a defense of free speech and transparency against political figures who allegedly misuse their position to spread misinformation. Medikol presents itself as a victim of political manipulation, emphasizing the importance of holding politicians accountable for their言论.

Večernji listIndependentProgressiveyesterday

Ivana Kekin, a member of the parliamentary group 'Možemo', has accused Medikol and the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) of attempting to silence her through multiple legal actions. She claims that Medikol, a private company receiving significant state funding for PET/CT services, has filed seven SLAPP lawsuits against her for raising questions about the lack of public healthcare infrastructure and the financial relationship between the state and Medikol. Kekin argues these lawsuits are not about protecting Medikol’s reputation but rather about suppressing critical voices in public discourse. She highlights specific instances where Medikol allegedly used legal pressure to deter scrutiny, including past cases involving journalist Slavica Lukić. Kekin further criticizes the HDZ and the current government for obstructing investigations into Medikol’s operations.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Medikol and HDZ as entities using legal tactics to suppress criticism and protect their interests, while portraying Kekin as a defender of public accountability. The language emphasizes systemic issues within the political and corporate sectors, suggesting a critique of power im平衡