ON
← Back to feed
Matteo Bruni: Reports of the Ripper are unfounded, the case is still being assessed
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

Matteo Bruni: Reports of the Ripper are unfounded, the case is still being assessed

Matteo Bruni, direktor Tiskovnega urada Svetega sedeža, je zavrnil poročila o domnevni odločitvi sodnikov v primeru p. Marka Ivana Rupnika kot 'povsem neutemeljena'. Navedel je, da sodni senat še vedno presoja primer in da podatkov ni mogoče razkrivati zaradi spoštovanja do sodnega postopka in zaščite oseb, ki jih primer zadeva. Pojasnil je, da je kanonski kazenski postopek sodne narave in da bo ugotovil, ali je obtoženi kriv. Zakonodaja držav velja za domnevna kazniva dejanja, medtem ko cerkvensko pravo uporablja za notranje življenje Cerkve.

Director of the Holy See Press Office, Matteo Bruni, has stated that reports circulating in recent days regarding the alleged decision of judges in the case of Father Mark Ivan Rupnik are “completely unfounded.” In a statement released today to the media, Bruni clarified that the trial is still ongoing and that the judicial council is examining documentation received from the involved bishops, the Society of Jesus, affected individuals, and the media. “Reports concerning any decision made by judges handling the case of Father Mark Ivan Rupnik are completely unfounded,” according to the Vatican News website. Bruni emphasized that “during the course of proceedings, as with any judicial process, no information regarding the progress of work can be disclosed, both out of respect for the process itself and to prevent additional suffering to those involved, as has occurred in recent days.” He added, “If the judicial council determines that additional information is needed, it will take all necessary steps on its own initiative to obtain it.” The statement also explained that the canonical criminal proceeding is of a judicial nature and continues regardless of outdated statutes that might otherwise apply to alleged criminal acts. The process will “determine, in accordance with canon law, whether the accused is guilty or not.” Canon law can, as noted, “judge and impose penalties regarding internal Church life,” while “for Father Mark Ivan Rupnik, the laws of the states in which the alleged criminal acts may have been committed continue to apply.” Therefore, “outdated statutes regarding such acts are determined by the legislation of individual states, independent of ecclesiastical authority.” A mistake was made in citing the following article. CONTACTS LOCATION Family d.o.o. Krekov trg 1 1001 Ljubljana

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Družina logoDružinaParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 75yesterday
Matteo Bruni: Reports of the Ripper are unfounded, the case is still being assessed

Matteo Bruni, direktor Tiskovnega urada Svetega sedeža, je zavrnil poročila o domnevni odločitvi sodnikov v primeru p. Marka Ivana Rupnika kot 'povsem neutemeljena'. Navedel je, da sodni senat še vedno presoja primer in da podatkov ni mogoče razkrivati zaradi spoštovanja do sodnega postopka in zaščite oseb, ki jih primer zadeva. Pojasnil je, da je kanonski kazenski postopek sodne narave in da bo ugotovil, ali je obtoženi kriv. Zakonodaja držav velja za domnevna kazniva dejanja, medtem ko cerkvensko pravo uporablja za notranje življenje Cerkve.

Bias read (Center): Artikel predstavlja objektivno poročilo o sodnem postopku v Cerkvi, brez izražanja političnih stališč ali stranskih interesov. Vse podatke je ponazarjal kot nezaključene in neodkriti, kar kaže na neutralnost. Ne obstajajo znaki stranskega naklonjenosti ali izbičkanja ene strani.

Why factuality (85): The article reports on statements made by Matteo Bruni regarding the lack of evidence supporting public reports about the case of Mark Ivan Rupnik. It accurately reflects the official position of the Vatican News and aligns with the cross-source consensus that no formal decision has been made. The a

Why objectivity (75): The tone remains professional but carries a slight editorial bias by emphasizing the Vatican's stance as authoritative and dismissing external reports as 'unsubstantiated.' While it presents facts neutrally, the emphasis on the Vatican's control over information suggests a subtle preference for inst

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories