Protesters break into SLP Congress in protest of so-called "Ley Serrano" that regulates AI; will affect freedom of expression, they say

A chaotic day unfolded in the Congress of San Luis Potosí on Tuesday as protesters stormed the legislative building in opposition to what they call the "Ley Serrano," a proposed law regulating artificial intelligence (AI). The demonstration took place amid the final stages of approving electoral reforms ahead of the 2026–2027 electoral process. Protesters argued that the law would restrict freedom of expression, leading them to forcibly enter the legislative chamber and temporarily halt the session.

The protests began early in the morning when various organizations mobilized in defense of free speech, marching through the historic center of San Luis Potosí toward the state congress. Despite security measures such as barriers and police presence, hundreds of demonstrators broke into the building and reached the main hall where the session had already begun. To prevent potential violence against legislators, the session was suspended.

Inside the chamber, the protesters confronted the few remaining lawmakers who were present and expressed their criticisms, particularly targeting the so-called "Ley Serrano." The legislator Héctor Serrano chose to leave the premises before the protesters could gain entry. After two hours and with the chamber nearly empty of representatives, the protesters decided to end their demonstration.

By midday, the legislative session resumed without further incidents. The agenda items were approved without significant debate, including various electoral modifications. These included making the Trust Control exams voluntary rather than mandatory for candidates, allowing candidate registration through digital platforms, and enabling electronic submission of documents. Additionally, the principle of presumed innocence was emphasized to ensure voting rights for individuals deprived of liberty who have not received a final conviction.

Other controversial proposals were left aside, notably the so-called "Ley Reyitos," which aimed to prevent candidates from falsely claiming a gender identity different from their birth gender to benefit from affirmative action policies related to gender equity. Critics argue this measure could unfairly disadvantage members of the LGBTQI+ community by limiting their access to candidacy positions.

The demonstrations highlight growing concerns over the regulation of AI and its implications for civil liberties. Proponents of the "Ley Serrano" argue that it is necessary to establish clear guidelines for the use of AI technologies, ensuring they do not infringe upon fundamental rights or spread misinformation. However, opponents believe the law could lead to excessive censorship and limit the ability of individuals and entities to express themselves freely online.

The situation has sparked discussions among legal experts, civil society groups, and political figures about the balance between technological innovation and the protection of democratic values. Some lawmakers have called for more transparent debates on the matter, emphasizing the need for public input and thorough evaluation of the proposed regulations.

As the legislative body moves forward with the approved electoral reforms, the controversy surrounding the "Ley Serrano" remains unresolved. Activists continue to demand its repeal, while supporters insist on its necessity for maintaining order and protecting citizens from potential abuses of AI technology. The outcome of these ongoing debates will likely shape future legislation and influence how AI is regulated in the region.

In the coming weeks, it is anticipated that further discussions will take place regarding the implementation of the new electoral laws and the potential introduction of additional measures related to AI governance. Public engagement and continued advocacy from both sides of the issue are expected to play a crucial role in determining the direction of policy moving forward.