ON
← Back to feed
Most Brazilians can't name deputies and senators, says Datafolha
BR🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 days ago

Most Brazilians can't name deputies and senators, says Datafolha

A Datafolha conducted a survey revealing that most Brazilians cannot recall the names of current federal deputies or senators, nor remember who they voted for in the 2022 legislative elections. According to the research, 68% of respondents could not name any federal deputy, while 75% failed to mention any active senator. Additionally, 67% did not remember their vote for federal deputy, and similar percentages applied to votes for senators and state deputies. The survey interviewed 2,004 people aged 16 or older across 139 Brazilian municipalities between June 17 and 18, with a margin of error of two percentage points. Among the 513 members of the Chamber of Deputies, only six were spontaneously mentioned by respondents, with Nikolas Ferreira being the most recognized at 6%. In the Senate, Flávio Bolsonaro was the most recalled at 3%. The study also noted incorrect responses, such as citing Senator Cleitinho as a federal deputy and mentioning Eduardo Bolsonaro despite his departure from Congress. The survey highlights a significant disconnect between voters and the legislative branch, with women showing higher rates of forgetting their votes. In contrast, 85% of respondents could rec

A majority of Brazilians are unable to name their elected representatives in Congress, according to a recent survey conducted by the Datafolha institute. The findings reveal a significant disconnect between the public and the legislative branch of government. According to the research, 68% of respondents could not recall the names of any current federal deputies, while 75% were unable to cite any active senators. This lack of familiarity extends beyond mere recognition—many individuals also struggle to remember who they voted for in the 2022 elections for these positions.

The survey was carried out between June 17 and 18 among 2,004 individuals aged 16 or older across 139 Brazilian municipalities. It has a margin of error of two percentage points. Among the 513 members of the Federal Chamber, only six were spontaneously mentioned by participants. The most frequently recalled name was that of federal deputy Nikolas Ferreira, cited by 6% of respondents. Other names included Erika Hilton, mentioned by 4%, and Gustavo Gayer, Kim Kataguiri, Lindbergh Farias, and Sâmia Bomfim, each named by 1%.

The data also highlights some inaccuracies in responses. For instance, Senator Cleitinho was mistakenly identified as a federal deputy, and Eduardo Bolsonaro was listed despite having left the Chamber. In the Senate, the most recognized figure was Flávio Bolsonaro, cited by 3% of respondents, followed by Romário, Cleitinho, and Sergio Moro, all mentioned by 2%. Additional names referenced include Damares Alves, Davi Alcolumbre, Eduardo Braga, Eduardo Girão, Hamilton Mourão, Marcos Pontes, Renan Calheiros, and Rogério Marinho.

The survey further indicates that the distance between voters and the Legislative Branch is reflected in memory regarding the 2022 elections. For federal deputies, 67% stated they did not remember whom they had voted for. Similarly, 66% could not recall their vote for senator or state deputy. Women showed higher rates of forgetfulness, with 75% unable to remember their vote for senator and 74% forgetting their vote for federal and state deputies.

Among supporters of the Workers' Party (PT), 70% could not recall their vote for senator, and 69% forgot their vote for federal deputy. Supporters of the Liberal Party (PL) had lower percentages: 63% did not remember their vote for federal deputy, 61% for state deputy, and 56% for senator.

In contrast, the choice of president remains more vivid in the collective memory. According to the Datafolha, 85% of respondents remembered who they had voted for in the 2022 presidential election. Only 7% claimed not to remember, and 8% said they had not voted for any candidate. Among PL supporters, 97% remembered their presidential vote, while 90% of PT supporters did so as well.

These results reinforce a trend observed in previous elections: the strong personalization of Brazilian politics around presidential contests, with less identification from voters with deputies and senators. Despite the importance of the National Congress in passing laws and shaping major national issues, the level of engagement and awareness appears significantly lower compared to the executive branch. This suggests a broader issue of political disengagement and detachment from the legislative process among the general population.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

Gazeta do Povo logoGazeta do PovoIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 907 days ago
Most Brazilians can't name deputies and senators, says Datafolha

A Datafolha conducted a survey revealing that most Brazilians cannot recall the names of current federal deputies or senators, nor remember who they voted for in the 2022 legislative elections. According to the research, 68% of respondents could not name any federal deputy, while 75% failed to mention any active senator. Additionally, 67% did not remember their vote for federal deputy, and similar percentages applied to votes for senators and state deputies. The survey interviewed 2,004 people aged 16 or older across 139 Brazilian municipalities between June 17 and 18, with a margin of error of two percentage points. Among the 513 members of the Chamber of Deputies, only six were spontaneously mentioned by respondents, with Nikolas Ferreira being the most recognized at 6%. In the Senate, Flávio Bolsonaro was the most recalled at 3%. The study also noted incorrect responses, such as citing Senator Cleitinho as a federal deputy and mentioning Eduardo Bolsonaro despite his departure from Congress. The survey highlights a significant disconnect between voters and the legislative branch, with women showing higher rates of forgetting their votes. In contrast, 85% of respondents could rec

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data from a survey without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on voter awareness and memory regarding elected officials, which is inherently a political issue but is presented neutrally through statistical findings.

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 90): The article accurately reports the findings of the Datafolha survey, including percentages and specific details like the number of respondents and margin of error. It provides context about the recall rates for both federal deputies and senators. The tone remains neutral, presenting facts without em

Folha de S.Paulo logoFolha de S.PauloIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 907 days ago
Data sheet: most Brazilians say they do not know or do not remember the name of any parliamentarian

The Datafolha poll reveals that most Brazilians cannot recall or cite the name of any federal deputy or senator currently in office. The survey, conducted by Datafolha, indicates that 68% of respondents do not mention any member of the Chamber of Deputies, while 75% cannot name any senator. This highlights a significant disconnect between citizens and their elected representatives at the national level.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data from a survey without overtly favoring any political ideology. It focuses on the statistical findings and does not frame the results in a way that suggests a particular political stance. The tone remains neutral, emphasizing the lack of public awareness rather than抨

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 90): This article mirrors the key findings from the first article, reporting similar statistics and methodology. It maintains a neutral tone and presents the data without embellishment or bias. The brief mention of 'leia mais' at the end is standard for news headlines and doesn't detract from objectivity

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories