ON
← Back to feed
Maharashtra government decides to withdraw FIRs against protesters; police continue investigation
India🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives10 days ago

Maharashtra government decides to withdraw FIRs against protesters; police continue investigation

The Maharashtra government has decided to withdraw First Information Reports (FIRs) against students and youth involved in recent protests related to the NEET exam paper leaks. Despite this decision, police authorities have stated that investigative procedures will continue until a formal order to halt the process is issued. The move followed a meeting between student representatives and top law enforcement officials, where demands for ending police harassment were raised. While the government agreed to the request, police emphasized that legal processes such as collecting statements and conducting investigations must proceed before any FIRs can be formally withdrawn. Student organizations remain concerned, noting that some protesters continue to receive FIR notices and face intimidation, suggesting ongoing tensions between authorities and activists.

Mumbai model Rhiya Ahir, who gained widespread attention after blocking a police vehicle during recent student protests, claimed the officers inside the van treated her with respect. Ahir, a 27-year-old actor and model, recounted her experience to news agency ANI, stating that her primary concern at the time was the safety and dignity of the police personnel inside the van. She emphasized that her actions were driven by a sense of responsibility toward both the protesters and law enforcement. Ahir described feeling anxious after her video footage circulated online, noting that she had not slept for two consecutive nights due to concerns for the students continuing to participate in the demonstrations. Her parents reportedly offered unwavering support throughout the ordeal. She expressed frustration with the government for filing FIRs against student protesters and called upon authorities to reconsider these charges. Ahir urged the government to recognize the students' legitimate grievances and to act as allies rather than adversaries. In response to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s assurances regarding the handling of the NEET paper leak case, Ahir acknowledged the importance of translating promises into tangible outcomes. She referenced the release of the alleged mastermind behind the 2024 leaks on bail, expressing hope that similar justice would be extended to the current situation. Ahir stressed the need for swift implementation of the government's commitments, emphasizing that mere declarations were insufficient. Ahir denied any ulterior motives behind her actions, clarifying that she wore a hoodie and a cap to avoid drawing unnecessary attention. She insisted that her intent was purely to support the cause of the protesters and to ensure that the demonstration remained non-violent. The Maharashtra government has decided to withdraw FIRs against students and youth involved in the protests, although legal procedures such as recording statements and issuing notices remain in progress. This decision followed a meeting between representatives of the All India Students’ Federation (AISF) and senior police officials. Despite the government's commitment to dropping the cases, confusion persists among students and activists as some continue to receive FIR notices through WhatsApp messages. Senior police officials explained that the investigation cannot be halted prematurely, highlighting the necessity of completing legal formalities before considering the withdrawal of FIRs. These processes include submitting charge sheets, conducting interviews, and compiling evidence. An official noted that the cases would be reviewed by a scrutiny committee before any decisions could be made on their withdrawal. AISF Mumbai President Aamir Kazi expressed concern over the continued receipt of FIR notices by students, indicating that the government's promise to drop the cases has not fully materialized. He urged the AISF to submit a formal request to the Mumbai Police Commissioner, asking for an end to the distribution of new notices and the cessation of police visits to protesters' homes. Harsha Disha, a student organization, criticized the government for failing to uphold its commitments, alleging that the distribution of FIR notices was intended to instill fear and discourage further protests. They called for the complete withdrawal of all FIRs and the accountability of police officers suspected of inciting violence. The current government directive allowing for the withdrawal of cases is set to expire on July 31. Authorities indicated that many investigations are ongoing, and charge sheets might not be filed before that date, suggesting an extension of the deadline. Officers emphasized that the faster charge sheets are submitted, the quicker the process of withdrawing FIRs can commence. Despite welcoming the government's decision, the AISF maintains that the fight continues until all legal proceedings against peaceful protesters are resolved. The federation reiterated its call for an immediate halt to police harassment and for the protection of the rights of student demonstrators.

2 reports

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7514 days ago
Mumbai model Rhiya Ahir who blocked police van says cops were 'respectful' towards her

Mumbai model and actress Rhiya Ahir, who gained widespread attention for blocking a police van during student protests, described the officers inside as 'respectful.' She emphasized that her actions were driven by a desire to support the students and uphold justice, not personal gain. Ahir expressed fear over the viral nature of her video and called on the government to withdraw FIRs against protesters, urging authorities to engage with the youth rather than suppress their voices. She also responded to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's assurances regarding legal reforms, stressing the need for tangible action beyond promises. Ahir denied claims that her participation was motivated by fame, stating she wore a hoodie and cap to avoid recognition.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protests and Ahir's involvement as a legitimate struggle for rights, emphasizing the students' perspective and criticizing the government's handling of the situation. It highlights calls for governmental accountability and reform, aligning more closely with progressive or left

Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the disruption in the Bihar Assembly due to discussions about the students' protests. It aligns with the broader context of the protests and matches the information presented in the primary source document. However, it doesn't explicitly reference the Supreme Court p

Why objectivity (75): The article presents a somewhat biased view by emphasizing the scale of the protests and the government's response. While it reports on multiple perspectives, the overall tone suggests sympathy for the protesters and criticism of the government's handling of the situation.

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 8010 days ago
Maharashtra government decides to withdraw FIRs against protesters; police continue investigation

The Maharashtra government has decided to withdraw First Information Reports (FIRs) against students and youth involved in recent protests related to the NEET exam paper leaks. Despite this decision, police authorities have stated that investigative procedures will continue until a formal order to halt the process is issued. The move followed a meeting between student representatives and top law enforcement officials, where demands for ending police harassment were raised. While the government agreed to the request, police emphasized that legal processes such as collecting statements and conducting investigations must proceed before any FIRs can be formally withdrawn. Student organizations remain concerned, noting that some protesters continue to receive FIR notices and face intimidation, suggesting ongoing tensions between authorities and activists.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a conflict between student activists and government/police authorities, emphasizing the continued harassment and intimidation faced by protesters. It highlights the perceived failure of the government to fully protect protesters and criticizes the tactics used by

Why factuality (75): The article reports on the Maharashtra government's decision to withdraw FIRs against protesters, citing a meeting between student groups and law enforcement. It provides details on ongoing investigations and legal procedures, aligning with cross-source consensus. While it does not reference a prima

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the situation in a neutral tone, detailing both government actions and police responses. It avoids taking sides and focuses on factual developments, though it includes quotes from officials which may slightly lean toward institutional perspective.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories