Machado denounces the US for excluding her from Venezuela negotiations; opposition leader has not returned to her country for months
Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado accused the United States of excluding her from ongoing negotiations between the Venezuelan government and a faction of the opposition taking place in Caracas. In an interview with The New York Times, she criticized businessman Alejandro Betancourt, a new energy partner of the U.S., calling him responsible for the suffering of Venezuelans. Machado, who has been unable to return to Venezuela for months, stated she would return soon to mobilize supporters ahead of future elections. She emphasized that any oil agreements signed by the U.S. and Venezuela must comply with Venezuelan law and expressed support for justice for victims of human rights violations under the current government. Machado also criticized former President Donald Trump for not supporting her as Maduro’s successor and instead backing the continuation of Chavismo under Delcy Rodríguez.
Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado accused the United States of excluding her from negotiations involving the government of Delcy Rodríguez and a faction of the opposition taking place this week in Caracas. In an interview with The New York Times, Machado criticized the U.S. for leaving her out of the talks and also denounced Alejandro Betancourt, a businessman linked to energy contracts with the Trump administration, as responsible for the suffering of Venezuelans. She stated she would return to Venezuela before expectations to mobilize supporters ahead of future elections. Machado has been unable to return to her country for months and claimed the U.S. had not invited her to participate in the ongoing discussions. The State Department countered that her party had been invited and that she could enter Venezuela whenever she wished. Machado questioned the role of Betancourt, who benefits from energy contracts and was associated with an agreement under the Trump administration to manage around a fifth of Venezuela’s oil reserves. She described him as "one of the main causes of the suffering endured by our people" and said he would not be a viable business partner in a potential government led by her. Despite her criticisms, Machado affirmed she would respect the energy agreements signed if they comply with Venezuelan law. She emphasized that Venezuela requires "security, stability, and legitimacy" to attract new investments. Regarding Rodríguez, whose government faces allegations of human rights violations, Machado argued that those responsible should answer to justice and proposed establishing an independent truth commission to collect testimony from victims and provide reparations. She stressed that the public demands justice, which is "absolutely legitimate." The interview followed former U.S. President Donald Trump ruling out Machado as a successor to Nicolás Maduro, captured by U.S. forces on January 3, and instead supporting the continuation of Chavismo under Rodríguez. Machado, who won the 2023 opposition primaries and backed the candidacy of Edmundo González Urrutia in the 2024 presidential elections, asserted she remained convinced that the U.S. seeks a democratic transition. Former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, declared themselves not guilty of new torture charges filed against them in a U.S. court. Both appeared before a New York court, where they face accusations of conspiracy to commit acts of torture against detainees in Venezuela, including U.S. citizens. Prosecutors allege that Maduro and Flores participated in actions aimed at suppressing and punishing the opposition, silencing dissent, and preserving power. Among the alleged abuses are simulated drownings, electric shocks, rapes, and beatings against individuals detained in Venezuela, causing severe physical and mental suffering. Maduro and Flores remain detained in Brooklyn, New York, following their capture on January 3 during a U.S. military operation in Caracas. They already faced charges related to drug trafficking and possession of firearms, for which they also claimed innocence. During their initial appearance in court, Maduro referred to himself as a "prisoner of war" and dismissed the charges as false. The new charges significantly expand the legal case against them. The U.S. Justice Department alleges that during Maduro’s presidency, which lasted from 2013 to 2026, he used political repression to maintain power. Prosecutors argue that the alleged torture was intended to intimidate, harass, and neutralize opponents, even through kidnappings. The charges include specific instances such as the alleged torture of an American citizen accused of plotting to assassinate Maduro, involving electric shocks, asphyxiation, beatings, and forced injections leading to seizures. Maduro and Flores are scheduled to face trial in New York starting June 1, 2027. Their lawyers requested a delay in the proceedings, and the trial is now set to begin on June 14, 2027. A hearing is planned for December 17 to address motions from the defense seeking dismissal of the case. Meanwhile, Venezuela has initiated a third round of dialogue aimed at achieving a political transition, led by Jorge Rodríguez, head negotiator for the government and president of the National Assembly, and Dinorah Figuera, representing the opposition. These talks began in August with U.S. backing, eight months after Maduro’s capture. Discussions focus on political processes, election organization, participation of parties, and selection of members of the Supreme Court of Justice. Agreements so far include the renewal of the Supreme Court, which critics say favors Chavismo, and cooperation to recover frozen gold reserves in London. Authorities in Venezuela have released some political prisoners and unfrozen censored news portals, though hundreds remain incarcerated. Delcy Rodríguez, acting president of Venezuela, pledged to hold elections, although no date was specified. Meanwhile, Machado’s party demands an electoral calendar and the removal of political restrictions preventing her from competing in the 2024 presidential elections.
Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado accused the United States of excluding her from ongoing negotiations between the Venezuelan government and a faction of the opposition taking place in Caracas. In an interview with The New York Times, she criticized businessman Alejandro Betancourt, a new energy partner of the U.S., calling him responsible for the suffering of Venezuelans. Machado, who has been unable to return to Venezuela for months, stated she would return soon to mobilize supporters ahead of future elections. She emphasized that any oil agreements signed by the U.S. and Venezuela must comply with Venezuelan law and expressed support for justice for victims of human rights violations under the current government. Machado also criticized former President Donald Trump for not supporting her as Maduro’s successor and instead backing the continuation of Chavismo under Delcy Rodríguez.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Machado's criticisms of the U.S. and the Venezuelan government, along with direct quotes from both parties involved. It does not favor one side over the other and includes opposing viewpoints without apparent bias in framing or emphasis.
Nicolás Maduro, the President of Venezuela, and his wife Cilia Flores have declared themselves not guilty of torture charges brought by the United States. The charges reportedly relate to alleged human rights abuses committed during their time in power. This development comes amid ongoing international scrutiny of Venezuela's human rights record. The case highlights the tensions between Venezuela and the U.S., particularly regarding allegations of political repression and abuse. Both Maduro and Flores have consistently denied any wrongdoing.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the declaration of innocence by Maduro and Flores without overtly favoring either side. It does not include explicit commentary or biased language that would indicate a clear ideological leaning. The focus is on the legal proceedings and the international implications ratherthan
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.