ON
← Back to feed
Car insurance is rising far faster than inflation. What’s driving the jump?
Australia🏛️ PoliticsCenter13 days ago

Car insurance is rising far faster than inflation. What’s driving the jump?

Car insurance premiums in Australia have risen significantly faster than general inflation, increasing by 8% over the past year compared to a 3% rise in the consumer price index. This has placed additional financial strain on households despite overall easing inflation. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) reported that insurance companies are failing to provide clear explanations for these sharp increases, often offering only vague justifications or none at all. Factors contributing to the rise include higher repair costs, taxes, and an increase in car thefts, particularly in Victoria, where car theft costs reached $243 million in 2025. ASIC urged insurers to improve transparency and clarity in their documentation to help consumers make informed decisions.

Car insurance companies are being urged to clarify the factors behind steep premium hikes, as Australia’s corporate regulator, ASIC, revealed that prices rose sharply above inflation in recent years. The review, published by ASIC today, found that motor vehicle insurance premiums surged by 8 percent in the year ending July 2025, marking a more than 42 percent increase since 2019. This has sparked growing concern among consumers, who have voiced frustration over the rapid rise in costs amid ongoing economic pressures. ASIC examined eight insurance brands operated by five major insurers, which together account for nearly three-quarters of the market. The investigation followed a notable uptick in customer complaints, with car insurance identified as the most complained-about product in the 2024–25 period. A key issue highlighted by ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland was that renewal notices from the five insurers failed to adequately explain the reasons behind the premium increases. “Those rises are well above the rate of inflation,” he noted, adding that consumers are seeking clarity on the causes of the hikes. The regulator emphasized that while it does not set insurance prices, it oversees how companies communicate with their clients. In its findings, ASIC stated that insurers have not sufficiently informed customers about the factors contributing to higher premiums. This lack of transparency leaves consumers uninformed about the true extent of price increases and the potential benefits of shopping around. For example, some insurers charge more for payment plans such as weekly or monthly installments, yet fail to highlight that annual payments could save customers between 10 and 20 percent. A significant portion of policyholders, two-thirds, renewed their coverage with the same insurer without contacting their provider or comparing alternatives. Of these, 40 percent did not seek better deals, often believing it unnecessary or unlikely to yield results. However, nearly one-third of those who questioned their premiums managed to secure lower rates. Commissioner Kirkland pointed out that this demonstrates the importance of challenging current offers, noting that “loyalty doesn’t pay.” He explained that long-term customers who remain with the same insurer may end up paying more compared to new customers or those who actively negotiate. Despite the findings, ASIC stressed that the report does not indicate that insurers are deliberately exploiting consumers. Instead, it highlights communication shortcomings. “We don’t regulate the prices that insurers offer to their customers,” Kirkland clarified, “but what we do regulate is the way in which they communicate with their customers.” The regulator concluded that all major insurers fell short in providing clear and informative explanations regarding premium changes. This scrutiny follows broader regulatory actions targeting the insurance sector. Earlier this year, ASIC initiated legal proceedings against IAG-owned RACQ, accusing the company of sending misleading renewal documents to thousands of customers over several years. The complaint alleges that RACQ provided inaccurate comparison pricing information, despite repeated customer complaints. This marks the second instance of legal action against RACQ, having previously been fined $10 million in November 2023 for deceptive practices related to insurance discounts. As the regulatory spotlight intensifies, the insurance industry faces mounting pressure to improve transparency and responsiveness to consumer concerns. With continued scrutiny, the expectation is that insurers will take steps to enhance communication and provide clearer insights into the drivers of premium increases.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

ABC News (Australia) logoABC News (Australia)State / PublicCenterFactual 65Objective 6013 days ago
'Loyalty doesn't pay': Car insurers asked to explain soaring premiums

ASIC, Australia's corporate regulator, has launched a legal action against RACQ over misleading insurance renewal comparisons and found that car insurance premiums rose sharply, outpacing inflation. The review revealed that major insurers failed to clearly explain the reasons behind premium hikes, leading to consumer dissatisfaction. ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland emphasized the importance of transparency, noting that many consumers remain unaware of potential savings by switching providers or paying annually. While some customers who challenged their premiums secured better deals, loyalty to insurers often resulted in higher costs. ASIC clarified that while pricing is not regulated, communication practices are, and the findings do not prove price gouging.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of ASIC's regulatory findings without overtly criticizing or praising specific insurers. It reports on regulatory actions and consumer behavior without taking a partisan stance, focusing on factual outcomes rather than ideological positions.

Why factuality (65): The article reports on ASIC's findings regarding rising car insurance premiums and consumer complaints, which aligns with the primary source document. However, it does not mention the specific issue of misleading 'last period premium' comparisons or the RACQ case directly. It focuses on broader prem

Why objectivity (60): The tone suggests concern about consumer pain and dissatisfaction, which is reasonable given the context. However, the article frames the issue primarily through the lens of premium increases and consumer complaints, without addressing the legal actions or the specific misleading practices mentioned

SBS News logoSBS NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 60Objective 7013 days ago
Car insurance is rising far faster than inflation. What’s driving the jump?

Car insurance premiums in Australia have risen significantly faster than general inflation, increasing by 8% over the past year compared to a 3% rise in the consumer price index. This has placed additional financial strain on households despite overall easing inflation. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) reported that insurance companies are failing to provide clear explanations for these sharp increases, often offering only vague justifications or none at all. Factors contributing to the rise include higher repair costs, taxes, and an increase in car thefts, particularly in Victoria, where car theft costs reached $243 million in 2025. ASIC urged insurers to improve transparency and clarity in their documentation to help consumers make informed decisions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents findings from ASIC regarding car insurance pricing and transparency issues. It includes perspectives from both ASIC and the Insurance Council of Australia, providing balanced views on the causes of rising premiums and the call for improved communication from insurers. There is a

Why factuality (60): The article discusses rising car insurance premiums and mentions ASIC's findings about lack of transparency, but does not specifically reference RACQ or the misleading 'last period premium' issue detailed in the primary source. It references a general ASIC report rather than the specific court actio

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the situation in a generally neutral tone, citing ASIC's concerns about transparency and customer understanding. However, it uses phrases like 'steep increases' and 'pressure on household budgets,' which may imply a negative framing of the insurance industry without directly tak

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories