ON
← Back to feed
Partisan struggle and extremism in the 1970s: the dark side of Italy in the Square
Italy🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive2 hr. ago

Partisan struggle and extremism in the 1970s: the dark side of Italy in the Square

The article discusses the emergence of 'Italia in Piazza,' a movement initially formed to protest rising living costs but which has since escalated into violent demonstrations, including shoplifting and clashes in Milan. The movement claims to be apolitical and decentralized, organizing through digital platforms like TikTok and Telegram. However, internal conversations suggest some participants view violence as a legitimate political tool, drawing parallels to militant leftist groups from the 1970s. While the leadership officially condemns the violence, there is evidence of dissent within the group, with some members justifying violence as necessary for change and others seeing opportunities for personal gain.

Parents and teachers formed a human shield between students and police during a protest in Turin on October 16, 2026, as tensions escalated during the "No Meloni Day" demonstration. The event took place near Corso Inghilterra, where teachers from various unions, including USB and Cub, stood shoulder-to-shoulder with students to prevent direct contact with law enforcement. This gesture became one of the defining images of the day, alongside a student’s plea to the police: “We’re on the same side, lower your shields.” The protest saw approximately 2,500 students participating after days of school occupations and unrest across Turin. Earlier in the week, the demonstrations had spread throughout the city and its province, involving strikes, self-governance initiatives, and acts of vandalism against schools. Some participants were masked and armed with sticks, leading to physical confrontations with teachers and police. As the demonstration moved toward Piazza Castello, tensions reached a peak when protesters hurled stones and bottles at police officers. In response, authorities deployed water cannons and tear gas. The area around the headquarters of the Metropolitan City and the Intesa Sanpaolo skyscraper was heavily secured by police and carabinieri. A bottle nearly hit an officer while the street was completely blocked off by police vehicles, including two water trucks and two armored cars. Traffic chaos ensued in the city center as the procession approached the Metropolitan City building. Protesters, many wearing black clothing and face coverings, climbed onto the monument dedicated to Victor Emmanuel II, lighting green smoke bombs and waving the No Tav flag. One individual scaled the monument's column, raised a middle finger, and mimicked holding a gun with a wooden stick. Local police managed traffic in emergency mode, directing drivers away from the square. Turin’s mayor, Lo Russo, issued an appeal via Instagram to students, urging them to protect their ideas and isolate those engaging in violence. He stated, “Many of you are protesting for attention and listening. Your reasons deserve to be heard. But there are also individuals entering schools with covered faces, breaking computers, destroying classrooms, and causing damage. These are hooligans who harm you most. There are those who exploit these images to speak only about clashes, leaving your issues aside. Violence takes space away from your reasons. I ask you specifically: isolate them, leave them alone. Make clear they act only for themselves because the school is yours, the protest is yours, and the ideas are yours. Defend them from those trying to turn them into violence.” Meanwhile, the movement known as “Italy in Piazza” has drawn comparisons to militant groups from the 1970s, with some participants discussing violence as a political tool. Conversations within private Telegram groups suggest that some view violence as a necessary step toward change, even referencing historical militant organizations such as the Bande Bellini. Despite official denouncements of violence by the movement’s leadership, internal discussions reveal conflicting views. One participant wrote, “Marx required a violent revolution because he believed it was the only way to overthrow the bourgeois state. Pacifism would have worked only after society had already become socialist.” Another user mentioned considering stolen goods as a personal gain opportunity, stating, “Honestly, I think about Rolexes too. Something worth so much and easy to steal. I could make three salaries in three minutes.” The movement claims to remain apolitical and spontaneous, yet the recent escalation of violence raises questions about its control over the protests. Organizers announced new demonstrations scheduled for October 24, under the slogan “Until the change definitely happens,” indicating plans for ongoing weekly gatherings. However, the growing influence of radical elements within the movement suggests that the situation may continue to evolve unpredictably.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 3 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

3 reports

La Stampa logoLa StampaIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 92Objective 884 days ago
Turin, parents and teachers act as a shield between students and the police

In Turin, parents and teachers formed a human shield between students and police during the 'No Meloni Day' protest. The event took place on Corso Inghilterra, where educators stood shoulder-to-shoulder to protect students from police forces equipped with anti-riot gear. One student addressed the police, saying, 'We're on the same side, lower your shields.' Tensions later escalated in Piazza Castello, where some protesters threw stones and bottles at officers, prompting the police to respond with water cannons and tear gas. Approximately 2,500 students participated in the demonstration, which followed days of school occupations and incidents of violence in Turin schools.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights actions by parents and teachers protecting students from police, suggesting a critical view of law enforcement tactics. It emphasizes the student's appeal to the police to 'lower their shields,' implying a critique of the police's approach. The focus on peaceful resistance and

Why factuality (92): La Stampa provides a clear account of the events in Turin, focusing on the role of parents and teachers acting as a buffer between students and police. It corroborates other reports about the violence in Turin, the number of participants (~2,500), and the broader context of the 'No Meloni Day.' The

Why objectivity (88): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting both the peaceful actions of parents and teachers and the subsequent escalation into violence. It avoids strong ideological language and focuses on describing what happened without taking sides. The inclusion of a student’s quote adds balan

Il Fatto Quotidiano logoIl Fatto QuotidianoIndependentCenter2 hr. ago
I've been on a train full of shit, but I've never been violent. It's rhetorical to say, "You have the money and you can't talk". I say what the fuck I want: Marrakesh responds to controversy

Marracash has responded to criticism following his comments on the recent disturbances in Milan. He acknowledged receiving both praise and backlash, including insults and threats on social media, which he argues demonstrates why such platforms are unsuitable for political discourse. While he admitted to taking 'a load of crap' for speaking out, he clarified that he has never glorified violence. He emphasized that all forms of violence should be condemned but questioned what leads minors to engage in such behavior, suggesting it reflects a societal failure for which everyone is responsible.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Marracash's responses to criticism in a balanced manner, quoting his statements directly without apparent editorializing or biased language. It does not favor one side over another in the discussion around violence and societal responsibility.

Il Giornale logoIl GiornaleParty-alignedProgressive21 hr. ago
Partisan struggle and extremism in the 1970s: the dark side of Italy in the Square

The article discusses the emergence of 'Italia in Piazza,' a movement initially formed to protest rising living costs but which has since escalated into violent demonstrations, including shoplifting and clashes in Milan. The movement claims to be apolitical and decentralized, organizing through digital platforms like TikTok and Telegram. However, internal conversations suggest some participants view violence as a legitimate political tool, drawing parallels to militant leftist groups from the 1970s. While the leadership officially condemns the violence, there is evidence of dissent within the group, with some members justifying violence as necessary for change and others seeing opportunities for personal gain.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights the ideological undercurrents within the movement, emphasizing references to historical leftist militancy and the normalization of violence as a political strategy. It frames these elements as problematic and potentially radical, aligning with a critical perspective often seen

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories