COThe article discusses a proposed law in Colombia that would restrict minors under 16 from accessing social media platforms to protect them from cyberbullying, child pornography, and online recruitment. However, the piece argues that this approach overlooks the challenges faced by educational institutions in addressing digital risks. The current school disciplinary system relies on observable evidence such as physical incidents or recorded messages, but digital harm often occurs through algorithms that operate beyond the visibility of students, teachers, or families. The article highlights a systemic gap where schools lack legal authority to access data from social media platforms, despite being responsible for student safety. It criticizes recent legislation and regulatory efforts for failing to address this imbalance, noting that while schools are required to update their policies, they are not provided with tools to verify or investigate digital threats effectively.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic failure of the education system and government regulation, emphasizing the need for stronger oversight of digital platforms. It critiques existing laws and policies for not providing schools with the necessary tools to monitor or respond to digital harms, a
Why factuality (85): The article discusses a proposed law in Colombia to restrict minors under 16 from accessing social media, citing concerns over cyberbullying, child pornography, and online recruitment. It references a police operation in Risaralda where a network was dismantled for drug distribution through social m
Why objectivity (78): The tone is critical of the education system's inability to address digital risks, using strong language like 'ceguera estructural' (structural blindness) to describe the systemic failure. While informative, it leans toward highlighting institutional shortcomings rather than presenting a balanced vi
