ON
← Back to feed
Long-lost battlefield where the Anglo Saxons destroyed a Viking army is discovered in Devon - including the burial mound of notorious Northman Ubbe Ragnarsson
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter6 days ago

Long-lost battlefield where the Anglo Saxons destroyed a Viking army is discovered in Devon - including the burial mound of notorious Northman Ubbe Ragnarsson

Researchers suggest that Castle Hill in Devon may be the long-lost battlefield of the 878 Battle of Cynuit, where Anglo-Saxon forces defeated a Viking army. The site, a former Iron Age hillfort, aligns with historical descriptions, including lacking a nearby water source and having weak defenses from the east. Historian Paul Harper and researcher Nick Arnold argue that Castle Hill matches accounts by Alfred the Great’s biographer Asser and later chronicler Geoffrey Gaimar. A large burial mound at the site is speculated to be the resting place of Viking leader Ubbe Ragnarsson. The discovery could resolve a longstanding historical mystery and highlight the strategic importance of the area during a critical period in English history.

A long-lost battlefield where Anglo-Saxon forces delivered a devastating defeat to a Viking army has been identified in Devon, according to new archaeological research. The site, located at Castle Hill near Beaford in North Devon, is believed to correspond to the legendary Battle of Cynuit, fought in 878. This confrontation marked a turning point in English history, as Alfred the Great’s kingdom of Wessex faced imminent collapse under the pressure of Viking invasions. Researchers claim the site aligns closely with historical accounts, suggesting it may hold the key to solving a centuries-old mystery. The battle, which took place during a critical period in the early medieval era, saw Anglo-Saxon warriors repelling a formidable Viking force. Estimates of casualties vary, with some sources citing over 800 Northmen slain, while others suggest the number could have reached 1,200. The victory at Cynuit is considered instrumental in shifting the balance of power, enabling Alfred to consolidate his rule and eventually drive the Vikings out of much of southern England. The discovery of Castle Hill adds a tangible link to this pivotal moment in history. Castle Hill is a former Iron Age hillfort, characterized by its ancient earth and stone ramparts. It lacks a nearby water source and is particularly vulnerable from the eastern side, features that match detailed descriptions of the battlefield provided by Alfred’s biographer, Asser. Later chroniclers, such as Geoffrey Gaimar, referred to the site as “Penwood,” a term interpreted as a headland adjacent to wooded areas. These descriptions align precisely with the geography of Castle Hill, further strengthening the case for its identification as the site of the battle. An essential element of the site is a prominent mound, approximately 39 feet wide and more than 8 feet high. Geophysical surveys indicate that this structure sits atop a rocky outcrop and is surrounded by a pile of stones. Historians speculate that this mound may have served as the burial ground for Ubbe Ragnarsson, a renowned Viking warlord. According to medieval accounts, Ubbe was killed in the battle and was subsequently interred beneath a massive tumulus by his followers. The name “Ubbelawe” is associated with this burial site, derived from the name Ubbe. Ubbe Ragnarsson was a leading figure among the Great Heathen Army, the vast Viking force that launched a major invasion of Anglo-Saxon England in 865. He was one of the sons of Ragnar Lothbrok, the legendary Viking chieftain immortalized in the television series Vikings. Historical records, including writings by Geoffrey Gaimar, describe Ubbe’s death at the Battle of Cynuit and his subsequent burial. The presence of the mound at Castle Hill offers a potential physical manifestation of these accounts, providing a rare opportunity to connect historical narratives with archaeological evidence. The research into Castle Hill was conducted by historians such as Paul Harper, who authored a book detailing the findings, and Nick Arnold, who examined historical records, maps, and ancient forts across Devon and Dartmoor. Arnold noted that Castle Hill is the only location in the region that fits the description of a headland fort with relatively weak defenses and exposure primarily from the east. Additionally, an ancient trackway is thought to have run alongside the hillfort, connecting Bideford and Exeter via a route now largely traversed by the A3124 road. Such infrastructure would have been crucial for military movements during the time of the battle. The discovery of Castle Hill raises intriguing questions about how historical battles are remembered and preserved. While the exact details of the Battle of Cynuit remain subject to interpretation, the alignment of geographical and textual evidence suggests that the site holds significant historical value. Further excavations and analysis may provide deeper insights into the lives of both the Anglo-Saxons and the Vikings, offering a clearer picture of their interactions during this formative period in British history.

1 reports

Daily Mail logoDaily MailIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 786 days ago
Long-lost battlefield where the Anglo Saxons destroyed a Viking army is discovered in Devon - including the burial mound of notorious Northman Ubbe Ragnarsson

Researchers suggest that Castle Hill in Devon may be the long-lost battlefield of the 878 Battle of Cynuit, where Anglo-Saxon forces defeated a Viking army. The site, a former Iron Age hillfort, aligns with historical descriptions, including lacking a nearby water source and having weak defenses from the east. Historian Paul Harper and researcher Nick Arnold argue that Castle Hill matches accounts by Alfred the Great’s biographer Asser and later chronicler Geoffrey Gaimar. A large burial mound at the site is speculated to be the resting place of Viking leader Ubbe Ragnarsson. The discovery could resolve a longstanding historical mystery and highlight the strategic importance of the area during a critical period in English history.

Bias read (Center): The article presents historical research and archaeological findings without overt ideological slant. It focuses on academic and scholarly interpretations of a past event, balancing both Anglo-Saxon and Viking perspectives. While the Viking leaders are referred to with terms like 'notorious,' this描绘

Why factuality (95): The article presents a claim about the discovery of a potential Viking-Anglo-Saxon battlefield in Devon based on historical descriptions and archaeological evidence. It references historian Paul Harper and researcher Nick Arnold, aligning with cross-source consensus that Castle Hill may be the site

Why objectivity (78): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'devastating defeat,' 'notorious Viking leader,' and 'met his demise,' which introduces a narrative tone. It emphasizes the significance of the find and the historical impact, which can be seen as promotional or sensationalist. The focus on the '

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories