ON
← Back to feed
Reduced non-wage labour costs, now no money in the insolvency fund: who will pay employees of bankrupt companies in the future?
Austria🏛️ PoliticsCenter4 days ago

Reduced non-wage labour costs, now no money in the insolvency fund: who will pay employees of bankrupt companies in the future?

The Insolvency Fund in Austria, which covers unpaid wages and severance payments for employees of bankrupt companies, is facing a severe financial shortfall. This is due to reduced employer contributions to the fund, which were cut by former Labor Minister Martin Kocher (ÖVP) in early 2022 when the fund had surplus funds. The reduction, combined with high numbers of corporate insolvencies, has led to the depletion of reserves. The Ministry of Labor estimates a need for 350 million euros next year, but only around 162 million euros will be available through current contributions. To address this gap, Labor Minister Korinna Schumann (SPÖ) suggests either taking out loans or reinstating the contribution rate to 0.2 percent. Unions and labor organizations argue that the cost of reducing employer contributions is now being passed onto workers and call for reversing the cut. However, the ÖVP and Neos oppose increasing employer contributions again, citing recent efforts to ease the burden on businesses.

The Insolvenzfonds, which covers unpaid wages and severance payments for employees of bankrupt companies, faces a severe funding shortfall due to reduced contributions and a surge in large insolvencies. The fund, normally funded through employer contributions to unemployment insurance, saw its reserves depleted after the government cut the contribution rate to 0.1 percent of the base in early 2022. This decision came amid perceived surplus in the fund, but combined with record numbers of insolvencies, has created a critical financial gap. For the coming year, the ministry expects an expenditure of 350 million euros, yet only around 162 million will flow into the fund, leaving a substantial deficit. Large-scale insolvencies have been a recurring issue in recent years, with companies such as Signa, KTM, Leiner, and Palmers among those declaring bankruptcy. These cases have placed continuous pressure on the Insolvenzentgeltfonds, which provides essential support to workers who lose their jobs due to corporate failure. The fund’s primary function is to ensure these individuals receive outstanding wages, vacation pay, and particularly crucially, severance packages. However, the current situation threatens this safety net. The reduction in employer contributions, initiated by former Minister Martin Kocher in 2022, has significantly impacted the fund's ability to cover its obligations. With the ongoing wave of insolvencies, the reserves have dwindled rapidly. Now, the government must find a solution to bridge the growing financial gap. Minister Korinna Schumann has proposed two main options: either the fund takes on loans to cover immediate costs or the employer contribution rate is increased back to 0.2 percent. Both options have drawn strong reactions. Trade unions and labor organizations, including the Austrian Chamber of Labour and the Austrian Trade Union Federation, argue that the previous reduction in contributions was a harmful policy that has now come back to haunt the workforce. They claim that the decision to lower the contribution rate was a misguided gift to businesses, which has now led to a crisis affecting workers. According to Ludwig Dvorák of the Vienna Chamber of Labour, the burden should fall on employers rather than the broader solidarity community, and he urges immediate reversal of the contribution cut. On the other hand, political parties such as the ÖVP and Neos have expressed reluctance toward increasing the contribution rate, citing concerns over economic stability and the need to maintain competitive business conditions. Wirtschaftsminister Wolfgang Hattmannsdorfer stated that raising the rates would be the wrong approach, while Neos' Josef Schellhorn suggested exploring alternative funding sources from economic chambers and trade unions instead. Bundeskanzler Christian Stocker has promised a resolution, though questions remain regarding the systemic underfunding of the fund or whether the current crisis stems from an unusually high number of insolvencies following the pandemic. Many businesses were supported during the pandemic with generous state aid, leading to financial instability once the support ended. Additionally, rising interest rates have further strained sectors like construction and real estate. While insolvency figures declined slightly in the first half of 2026, the overall economic climate remains subdued, with Austria experiencing minimal growth. As the debate continues, the challenge lies in balancing the interests of workers, employers, and policymakers to ensure continued financial security for those affected by corporate failures.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Der Standard logoDer StandardIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 554 days ago
Reduced non-wage labour costs, now no money in the insolvency fund: who will pay employees of bankrupt companies in the future?

The Insolvency Fund in Austria, which covers unpaid wages and severance payments for employees of bankrupt companies, is facing a severe financial shortfall. This is due to reduced employer contributions to the fund, which were cut by former Labor Minister Martin Kocher (ÖVP) in early 2022 when the fund had surplus funds. The reduction, combined with high numbers of corporate insolvencies, has led to the depletion of reserves. The Ministry of Labor estimates a need for 350 million euros next year, but only around 162 million euros will be available through current contributions. To address this gap, Labor Minister Korinna Schumann (SPÖ) suggests either taking out loans or reinstating the contribution rate to 0.2 percent. Unions and labor organizations argue that the cost of reducing employer contributions is now being passed onto workers and call for reversing the cut. However, the ÖVP and Neos oppose increasing employer contributions again, citing recent efforts to ease the burden on businesses.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives, labor unions and the government, without overtly favoring one side. It reports on the financial challenges of the Insolvency Fund, the reasons behind the funding shortfall, and the differing opinions among political parties and interest groups. There is no clear

Why factuality (65): The article discusses the Insolvenzfonds and its financial challenges due to reduced contributions from employers, but it does not reference the primary source document about the decline in company bankruptcies. It focuses on a different aspect of the broader economic situation and lacks direct alig

Why objectivity (55): The tone is somewhat alarmist, focusing on the potential crisis in the Insolvenzfonds without providing balanced perspectives on possible solutions or alternative viewpoints. The language suggests concern without offering a neutral analysis of the issue.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories