ON
← Back to feed
Lobbyist defends ‘shit sheet’ on former Liberal MP despite admitting he knew ‘there was no affair’, Icac hears
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative11 days ago

Lobbyist defends ‘shit sheet’ on former Liberal MP despite admitting he knew ‘there was no affair’, Icac hears

A lobbyist, Jeremy Greenwood, testified before the Independent Commission Against Corruption (Icac) in New South Wales regarding his involvement in creating a damaging report against former Liberal MP David Elliott. Greenwood admitted to commissioning a document referred to as a 'shit sheet' that included false claims about Elliott having an extramarital affair, despite knowing the claim was untrue. The document was intended to discredit Elliott, though Greenwood claimed it was not directly linked to Jean Nassif, a fugitive property developer. Additionally, Icac is investigating whether Greenwood's firm, Beckington, used a fake administrative assistant named 'Jessica' to solicit illegal donations for a conservative faction within the Liberal Party. The inquiry is examining potential violations related to branch stacking, a controversial practice involving the recruitment of party members.

A lobbyist under investigation by the New South Wales corruption watchdog has admitted to commissioning a “shit sheet” on a former Liberal MP, knowing a reference to a purported extramarital affair was untrue, an inquiry has heard. The consultant and lobbyist Jeremy Greenwood gave his second day of evidence to the Independent Commission Against Corruption’s (Icac) Operation Rosny on Tuesday. Greenwood is named in two of the watchdog’s allegations. He is among three Liberal figures who allegedly took donations from Jean Nassif, a fugitive property developer, in exchange for the pursuit of outcomes including damage to the career of the former NSW Liberal minister and MP David Elliott. On Tuesday, Greenwood was asked about a document titled “David Elliott shit sheet.docx”, which he emailed to himself in December 2020. The inquiry previously heard from Dylan Whitelaw, a former employee of ChristianEllis and Greenwood at registered lobbying company Beckington, that he had been asked by Greenwood to write part of the document. Greenwood accepted this evidence, but like Whitelaw told the commission he did not write a section with the sub-heading “extramarital affair”. Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email Following Whitelaw’s evidence, during which he accepted under cross-examination that no such affair had taken place, Elliott issued a statement rejecting the allegations. Greenwood admitted that when he sent the document to himself, with a view to using it to discredit Elliott, he knew the affair to be untrue. “To make it very clear, particularly for Mr Elliott’s family, we figured out pretty quickly there was no affair,” he said. But Greenwood rejected that the document, which he said was never circulated, had been created to benefit Nassif, saying “there was an ongoing thing with [Elliott] from well before I met Jean Nassif”. “David Elliott was actively attacking Beckington, Christian, and myself, and I think it’s perfectly fine to have defence on this,” he said. Elliott has been contacted for comment. ‘Jessica’ the fake administrative assistant On Tuesday, the inquiry heard that Beckington, which allegedly accepted illegal donations to fund factional Liberal party work, created a fake administrative assistant called “Jessica”. Icac is investigating whether the company was used by a Christian Liberal factional group known as the Reformers to solicit or accept prohibited donations for the recruitment or renewal of members to the party. The practice, known as branch stacking, is not itself illegal. The group wanted more conservative policies on issues such as same-sex marriage, abortion and euthanasia. Icac has heard that Beckington, set up by Greenwood and Ellis in 2019, accepted payments for factional work through fake invoices to Michael O’Hara, a prohibited donor, and the schools governing body Catholic Schools NSW. Greenwood has said he cannot recall either arrangement. On Tuesday, counsel assisting, Peggy Dwyer SC, read out 2020 correspondence from Beckington to Catholic Schools NSW with invoices, signed “Kind regards, Jessica”. “Who’s Jessica?” she asked. “Sorry, I’m not laughing,” said Greenwood. “Jessica was a fake admin name Christian created. He just thought it was funny.” After Dwyer said she was “not getting the joke”, Greenwood said: “We have silly humour. Sorry.” Greenwood repeatedly said he could not recall if the company paid Reformers members to do factional work. He said he believed the company had made payments to Jean-Claude Perrottet, the younger brother of the former premier Dominic Perrottet. Dominic Perrottet is not named in Icac’s allegations. “If he wanted money, we looked after him,” said Greenwood, who later admitted to a payment of $12,000 to Jean-Claude Perrottet, who he described as his “favourite friend”. Ellis moved to the UK at the start of this year, and the inquiry has heard he declined to give oral evidence, but on Monday Greenwoo

2 reports

The Guardian (World) logoThe Guardian (World)IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8512 days ago
Lobbyist defends ‘shit sheet’ on former Liberal MP despite admitting he knew ‘there was no affair’, Icac hears

A lobbyist, Jeremy Greenwood, testified before the Independent Commission Against Corruption (Icac) in New South Wales regarding his involvement in creating a damaging report against former Liberal MP David Elliott. Greenwood admitted to commissioning a document referred to as a 'shit sheet' that included false claims about Elliott having an extramarital affair, despite knowing the claim was untrue. The document was intended to discredit Elliott, though Greenwood claimed it was not directly linked to Jean Nassif, a fugitive property developer. Additionally, Icac is investigating whether Greenwood's firm, Beckington, used a fake administrative assistant named 'Jessica' to solicit illegal donations for a conservative faction within the Liberal Party. The inquiry is examining potential violations related to branch stacking, a controversial practice involving the recruitment of party members.

Bias read (Center): The article presents testimony from both the lobbyist and the affected MP, providing balanced perspectives without overtly favoring one side. It includes direct quotes from Greenwood and mentions Elliott's denial of the allegations, indicating an attempt to present multiple viewpoints fairly.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the admission by Jeremy Greenwood regarding the 'shit sheet' document and the lack of an actual affair. It cites the Icac inquiry and includes direct quotes from Greenwood. The details align with the cross-source consensus, though some information may be incomplete due

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting facts from the inquiry without overt bias. However, the term 'shit sheet' is emotionally charged and could be seen as influencing perception, slightly reducing the neutrality.

The Spectator logoThe SpectatorIndependentConservativeFactual 25Objective 3011 days ago
The Political Homes of Westminster – Dirty Deeds, Dark Dealings

The article titled 'The Political Homes of Westminster – Dirty Deeds, Dark Dealings' by The Spectator appears to focus on the controversial aspects of political life within Westminster, suggesting there are hidden dealings and unethical behavior among politicians. The headline implies a critical stance toward the political establishment, highlighting issues such as corruption, secrecy, and moral compromises. However, the content provided is limited to the title and a reference to The Spectator Shop, which seems to be a section or product offering rather than the full article. As such, the specific allegations or evidence presented in the article cannot be fully assessed based on the available information.

Bias read (Conservative): The headline uses strong, negative language ('Dirty Deeds', 'Dark Dealings') that aligns with conservative critiques of political corruption and elitism. While the article does not provide detailed content, the tone and phrasing suggest a right-leaning framing that emphasizes accountability and the丑

Why factuality (25): The article title suggests a sensationalized narrative about political dealings in Westminster without any supporting content or primary sources. It lacks specific factual claims or evidence to substantiate its allegations, making it highly speculative. With no primary source available and no cross-

Why objectivity (30): The title uses emotionally charged language ('Dirty Deeds', 'Dark Dealings') which implies a biased or sensationalist perspective. There is no attempt to present multiple viewpoints or maintain neutrality, indicating a lack of objectivity.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories