ON
← Back to feed
Janša should come to Koseze to learn how to run a serious political drama
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive7 days ago

Janša should come to Koseze to learn how to run a serious political drama

The article discusses the chaotic and politicized nature of local governance in Koseze, Slovenia, highlighting the struggles between residents, property managers, and administrative authorities. It uses the metaphor of a 'political animal' to describe the role of the property manager, who holds significant power over daily life in the building. The piece critiques the inefficiency and lack of democratic engagement in managing communal spaces, such as infrastructure projects and utility services. It contrasts past freedom with current restrictions, suggesting that the community has lost autonomy and control over their living conditions. The tone is critical of bureaucratic control and the erosion of personal freedoms within the housing complex.

In a small residential block in Koseze, residents have grown accustomed to navigating the complexities of shared living spaces, where governance is fragmented among property managers, tenants, two hyperactive neighbors, and a homeowners' association that meets just twice a year, often with many attendees conveniently forgetting they have more pressing matters, such as elections. The situation has led one resident to suggest that Prime Minister Janez Janša might benefit from visiting their block to learn how to manage a serious political drama. Here, everything from infrastructure projects to foreign policy unfolds within the confines of a single building. While President of the Republic Nataša Pirc Musar defends herself over a traffic accident, residents can defend their decision to place three basil pots on their balcony. She governs a country, while they manage a block. The resident, who has lived in this plant-concrete kingdom for two decades, recalls a time when she was a rural dweller, where opening the door meant stepping outside without needing approval from a supervisory board. If someone wanted to plant a tree, they simply did it. No records were required, no votes taken, no committees formed for tree-related issues. Dogs, cats, and chickens ran freely around, and nobody raised a fuss. Now, however, everything seems to be scrutinized. Adaptability is key in this environment. One learns to accept that replacing a radiator is an organizational project requiring more coordination than an EU budget. When calling a plumber, the property manager explains that water must be turned off, not just for oneself, but for everyone. And one discovers that water is shut off twice a year, in the presence of three witnesses and a property manager who sometimes appears to be there because of them, rather than the other way around. Above and below are neighbors. Through one's apartment run pipes connected to others, somewhere beneath lies shared electricity, above is a roof about which all decide. This is the fundamental law of block life: your apartment is yours, but not entirely. And then there is the property manager, a peculiar kind of political animal, as described by Žan Mahnič. The previous one was excellent until two residents drained him so thoroughly he left. That is the law of the block: two dissatisfied individuals possess more energy than forty satisfied ones. Democracy in practice! The current one quickly dismisses complaints. He is correct, though as cold as Antarctica. Then there are the homeowners' associations, the parliament of the block. Generally, decisions are made regarding urgent renovations. It becomes clear that it is easier to agree on new handrails on the staircase than, say, a new electrical installation. Handrails are visible. Electricity isn't. Until it burns out, or until someone buys an electric car and the property manager warns: check before buying such a car. And he is right. In the garage corridor, there are a hundred garages. Charging stations, however, are approximately as numerous as water springs in the Sahara. None. Some have set them up before the ban, others more like partisans. Systemic solutions are lacking. Perhaps they will come before the elections. Then suddenly everything changes: asphalt roads are laid, sidewalks installed, bridges built that previously could not even be drawn. Perhaps Mayor Zoran Janković will remember us, the electric poor. Nevertheless, we have already adapted to many things in Koseza. Parking? Sometimes we parked one after another! But Mayor Janković sorted it out. Parking is charged. Sixty euros per year. However, this does not mean you will park. It’s like a theater ticket, where the seat goes to whoever arrives first. But we have adapted. We are not like the “Štepanjci.” We didn’t protest much, we grumbled slightly, and moved forward. Likewise, when our neighborhood was closed to cars. Previously, one went once a week to the store, now one goes three times because one can carry only as much as hands allow. Fitness is no longer necessary. Peace, however, is gone. We have cyclists, scooters, and electric skateboards zooming past with self-confidence that makes traffic signs feel like decoration. The block also has softer sides. Balconies are botanical gardens. Some have so much greenery that I fear some concrete gutter might one day go on its own path toward the ground. Cats, meanwhile, are a special story. Owners have them, landowners have them, and sometimes they seem to have minds of their own.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

Reporter logoReporterIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 859 days ago
Janša should come to Koseze to learn how to run a serious political drama

The article discusses the chaotic and politicized nature of local governance in Koseze, Slovenia, highlighting the struggles between residents, property managers, and administrative authorities. It uses the metaphor of a 'political animal' to describe the role of the property manager, who holds significant power over daily life in the building. The piece critiques the inefficiency and lack of democratic engagement in managing communal resources like water supply and infrastructure. It contrasts past freedom with current restrictions, suggesting that the community has lost autonomy and control over their living conditions. The tone implies frustration with bureaucratic processes and the perceived manipulation by those in authority.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the challenges faced by residents as a critique of centralized control and bureaucratic inefficiency, which aligns with left-leaning perspectives that emphasize community empowerment and democratic participation. The portrayal of the property manager as a 'political animal' and a

Why factuality (75): The article provides a personal account of local governance challenges in a residential block, referencing specific issues like infrastructure projects, community meetings, and bureaucratic procedures. While these details align with common experiences in such settings, they lack specific dates, name

Why objectivity (85): The tone is largely conversational and anecdotal, using humor and hyperbole ('resna politična drama') to describe everyday frustrations. It avoids overt bias but leans toward a subjective perspective, emphasizing the author’s personal experience rather than presenting multiple viewpoints. Emotional

Svet24 logoSvet24IndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 507 days ago
A road will be rebuilt in a Roma settlement

The article reports that road repairs are being carried out in a Roma settlement in Slovenia. The headline indicates that these maintenance works are taking place, but the article itself does not provide detailed information about the scope, timeline, or specific reasons behind the repairs. There is no further elaboration on local conditions, community reactions, or any broader implications related to infrastructure development in Roma communities.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual statement about road maintenance in a Roma settlement without overtly favoring any political stance. It does not engage in ideological framing or emphasize particular viewpoints, making it difficult to assign a clear lean. The focus remains on the event itself rather

Why factuality (65): The article reports that road repairs will take place in a Roma settlement, but lacks specific details such as dates, scope, or official sources. While this aligns with cross-source consensus that infrastructure improvements are occurring in marginalized communities, the lack of verifiable informati

Why objectivity (50): The tone is somewhat dismissive and lacks nuance, implying that the Roma community is being 'repaired' rather than acknowledging systemic neglect. The phrasing suggests a lack of empathy and fails to present multiple perspectives.

Reporter logoReporterIndependentProgressive9 days ago
Janša should come to Koseze to learn how to run a serious political drama

The article discusses the chaotic and politicized nature of local governance in Koseze, Slovenia, highlighting the struggles between residents, property managers, and administrative authorities. It uses the metaphor of a 'political animal' to describe the role of the property manager, who holds significant power over daily life in the building. The piece critiques the inefficiency and lack of democratic engagement in managing communal spaces, such as infrastructure projects and utility services. It contrasts past freedom with current restrictions, suggesting that the community has lost autonomy and control over their living conditions. The tone is critical of bureaucratic control and the erosion of personal freedoms within the housing complex.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the property manager as a 'political animal' and criticizes the centralized control over residents' lives, implying a critique of authoritarian management styles. It portrays the current system as oppressive compared to the more autonomous past, aligning with left-leaning values.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories