Liveblog Iran War: Iranian media publishes video: Where can Trump be killed?
An Iranian state-affiliated news agency, Fars, shared a video titled 'Where Can Trump Be Killed?' on social media platforms, including Telegram. The video appears to highlight potential security vulnerabilities along U.S. President Donald Trump’s route to his residence in Mar-a-Lago, Florida, specifically pointing out a bridge as a critical point. However, the visual representation of the route does not align directly with publicly available maps. This comes amid retaliatory actions by Iran following the February death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in an Israeli airstrike. Additionally, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard attacked a military base in eastern Syria, claiming it was retaliation for the deaths of Iranian soldiers in southeastern Iran. Meanwhile, seven people were killed in U.S. airstrikes targeting bridges in southern Iran, according to state media. In Qatar, a child was injured during the interception of an Iranian missile attack, while Iran reported drone attacks on U.S. bases in Kuwait.
Two U.S. soldiers were killed and one missing in Jordan following a surge in hostilities between the United States and Iran, according to reports emerging late Friday, July 18, 2026. This incident comes amid escalating tensions in the Middle East, with Iran accusing the U.S. of attacking civilian infrastructure and warning of a broader regional conflict. The deaths in Jordan mark a dramatic escalation in the already volatile situation between the two nations, which had recently signed a preliminary agreement aimed at ending their conflict. However, both sides appear to be disregarding the accord, with Iran declaring it null and void due to repeated violations by the U.S. Iran has accused the U.S. of launching attacks on civilian infrastructure, including power plants, desalination facilities, and bridges, in retaliation for alleged Iranian aggression. According to reports, Iran has directed its regional allies, including Hezbollah in Lebanon, to prepare for a larger-scale conflict, potentially involving Israel. The Iranian government has stated that it will continue offensive operations unless the U.S. halts its attacks within two to three days. General Major Mohsen Rezaei, a senior military advisor to Iran’s Supreme Leader, emphasized that Iran would no longer limit itself to retaliatory strikes and that no political boundary would remain safe. The conflict has taken a toll on both sides. According to Iranian authorities, U.S. attacks since late June have resulted in at least 50 deaths and over 500 injuries. These attacks primarily targeted southern provinces of Iran, particularly the oil-rich region of Kuzestan. In response, Iran has launched strikes on U.S.-aligned targets in the region, including a power and desalination plant in Kuwait, which sparked a fire. Similar attacks were reported in Bahrain and Jordan, further intensifying the cycle of violence. The U.S. military confirmed that it conducted airstrikes targeting a surveillance tower at Iran’s Chabahar port on the Gulf of Oman, part of a maritime monitoring system used by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The U.S. Central Command stated that the destruction of the tower degraded the IRGC’s ability to coordinate attacks on civilian crews and protected freedom of navigation in regional waters. The U.S. has continued its airstrikes for six consecutive nights, expanding its campaign to include bridges and other critical infrastructure, in accordance with President Donald Trump’s threat to strike such targets to pressure Iran to ease its grip on the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian state media reported damage to the electrical grid in southern Iran, prompting calls for citizens to reduce electricity consumption. Additionally, the Revolutionary Guards claimed responsibility for the explosion and subsequent fires of two oil tankers near the Strait of Hormuz, allegedly caused by U.S. intelligence services misleading the vessels into entering a minefield. The Guards warned that attacks would continue until peace is restored along Iran’s southern coast and in the Strait of Hormuz. The United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres condemned the attacks on civilian infrastructure in the region, calling them "unacceptable." He expressed deep concern over the ongoing military escalation between Iran and the U.S., emphasizing the need for immediate de-escalation. Meanwhile, the Palestinian Health Authority reported eight deaths and 20 injuries in a recent Israeli air strike on a mourning gathering in Gaza, attributed to an earlier attack on the same day. As the situation continues to unfold, the risk of a broader regional conflict looms large. Iran’s warnings to its allies, including Hezbollah, suggest that the conflict could extend beyond the current borders, potentially drawing in Israel. The U.S. has yet to confirm the extent of the damage reported by Iran, but its continued military actions indicate a willingness to sustain the pressure on Iran despite the growing humanitarian and geopolitical risks.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
On Thursday evening, Iran reported three deaths due to American airstrikes in southern Iran and responded with retaliatory actions. The Jordanian military claims to have intercepted ten missiles, while Bahrain and Kuwait were also targeted by Tehran.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the situation without apparent bias, providing information on both Iranian casualties and the responses from other countries involved. There is no evident framing that favors one side over another.
Why factuality (80): The article discusses the legal aspects of the U.S. blockade and the status of the Strait of Hormuz, which relates to the primary source. It provides context on international law but omits specific details about the failed interim deal.
Why objectivity (85): The article is highly objective, focusing on legal interpretations and providing balanced perspectives on the actions of both the U.S. and Iran.
Middle East EyeIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7011 days ago
Bahrain's Defence Forces announced that they intercepted a series of missiles launched from Iran. The military issued a warning to the public to remain vigilant and avoid approaching any suspicious objects left behind by the attack, urging immediate reporting. In a statement, Bahrain condemned the use of missiles and aircraft against civilian targets and private property, calling it a clear violation of international humanitarian law.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a military action involving missile interception and includes direct quotes from Bahrain's defense forces. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, nor does it favor one side over another. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the reported actions and statements without
Why factuality (80): The article discusses the increasing autonomy of the Houthis and their evolving role in the conflict, providing historical context and recent developments. It aligns with the primary source document's information on the broader conflict and the Houthis' actions, though it focuses more on the interna
Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat analytical but leans towards portraying the Houthis as a growing threat, possibly influenced by the perspective of the source. The article highlights the Houthis' increasing independence from Iran, which may reflect a particular viewpoint on the conflict.
Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 7015 days ago
An Iranian state-affiliated news agency, Fars, shared a video titled 'Where Can Trump Be Killed?' on social media platforms, including Telegram. The video appears to highlight potential security vulnerabilities along U.S. President Donald Trump’s route to his residence in Mar-a-Lago, Florida, specifically pointing out a bridge as a critical point. However, the visual representation of the route does not align directly with publicly available maps. This comes amid retaliatory actions by Iran following the February death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in an Israeli airstrike. Additionally, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard attacked a military base in eastern Syria, claiming it was retaliation for the deaths of Iranian soldiers in southeastern Iran. Meanwhile, seven people were killed in U.S. airstrikes targeting bridges in southern Iran, according to state media. In Qatar, a child was injured during the interception of an Iranian missile attack, while Iran reported drone attacks on U.S. bases in Kuwait.
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple geopolitical developments involving Iran and the United States without overtly favoring either side. It reports on actions taken by both nations, including retaliatory strikes and military operations, using primarily official sources such as state media and government-‐
Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports on the US strikes on bridges in Iran and the subsequent Iranian retaliation, aligning with the primary source. It also mentions the damage to Kuwait's infrastructure, which is consistent with the primary source's description of the conflict's impact.
Why objectivity (70): The article is mostly factual and neutral, though it emphasizes the US actions and the resulting Iranian retaliation. It could have provided more context on the broader implications of the failed deal.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
