IL🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives9/2/2026
IRGC targeting bases to push US out of region before renewed Israel war, expert tells 'Post'
Military historian and analyst Tom Cooper told The Jerusalem Post that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is targeting U.S. bases and allies in the region as part of a strategy to remove the United States from the area before a potential renewed conflict with Israel. This follows recent Iranian retaliatory strikes against U.S.-linked sites in Jordan, Kuwait, and Bahrain after the U.S. resumed strikes on IRGC targets in Iran. Cooper argues that by attacking Gulf states and disrupting energy and fertilizer exports, Iran aims to exert pressure on its neighbors and force a political reassessment. He notes that the IRGC has prepared for a multi-front war for decades, including building underground missile facilities, allowing it to withstand prolonged attacks. Cooper also suggests that U.S. President Donald Trump's limited patience and waning support for Israel could influence the outcome of future conflicts.
Iran has launched attacks on U.S. military installations in Jordan and the United Arab Emirates following U.S. airstrikes on Iranian territory, according to reports from Iranian state media. The strikes occurred in the early hours of Monday, August 31, 2026, targeting U.S. air bases in both nations. The attacks included the downing of an American drone over the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran claimed was in response to U.S. strikes on Larak Island earlier that week. Jordan’s armed forces confirmed they intercepted at least eight missiles during the assault, stating that all were destroyed before reaching civilian areas or infrastructure. The country reiterated its commitment to protecting its population from potential threats. Meanwhile, the UAE did not issue detailed statements, but officials have historically maintained a firm stance against foreign interference in their sovereign territory. The Iranian government has framed its actions as a legitimate exercise of self-defense, citing the U.S. strikes as acts of aggression. According to Rudaw media, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) stated that its Aerospace Force executed a coordinated operation involving ballistic missiles and drones against the King Hussein and al-Azraq air bases in Jordan. The attack was described as a direct response to what Iran termed “American-Zionist aerial aggression.” This is not the first time Iran has targeted Jordan. Over the past year, Iran has increasingly directed its retaliatory efforts toward the kingdom, choosing it as a strategic focus point. Analysts suggest this shift may be intended to avoid provoking other Gulf states, particularly Saudi Arabia, which recently formed a new alliance with Turkey and Pakistan. Iran is also seeking improved relations with Qatar and Oman, leaving Jordan and the UAE as the remaining viable targets for retaliation. The choice of Jordan and the UAE appears to reflect a broader strategy aimed at sending a message to the United States. By attacking U.S. bases in these locations, Iran seeks to demonstrate that it can strike even when American forces are positioned outside the Gulf. This approach avoids direct confrontation with Israel, which Iran claims is behind the U.S. strikes. Such a move also prevents Israel from responding directly, thus limiting the risk of a wider conflict. The UAE, as a signatory to the Abraham Accords, hosts U.S. military presence and has been a key ally of Washington in the region. Despite hosting U.S. forces, Iran has not targeted Qatar, despite the presence of U.S. bases there. Analysts believe this is due to Qatar’s diplomatic role in brokering peace talks and its historical ties with Iran. Similarly, Iran has reduced its threats against Kuwait, indicating a more nuanced approach to regional diplomacy. Egypt has expressed concern over the escalating tensions, warning that continued hostilities could destabilize the Middle East. The Egyptian Foreign Ministry issued a statement condemning Iran’s attacks on Jordan and the UAE, emphasizing the need to preserve regional stability. Egypt also reaffirmed its support for both nations, calling for the protection of their sovereignty and the safety of their citizens. Iran’s decision to target Jordan and the UAE reflects a calculated effort to assert influence without triggering a broad-scale conflict. By focusing on countries that it perceives as less likely to retaliate, Iran aims to maintain leverage while avoiding direct confrontation with major powers. As the situation continues to unfold, the international community will be watching closely for signs of further escalation or de-escalation in the volatile region.
Military historian and analyst Tom Cooper told The Jerusalem Post that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is targeting U.S. bases and allies in the region as part of a strategy to remove the United States from the area before a potential renewed conflict with Israel. This follows recent Iranian retaliatory strikes against U.S.-linked sites in Jordan, Kuwait, and Bahrain after the U.S. resumed strikes on IRGC targets in Iran. Cooper argues that by attacking Gulf states and disrupting energy and fertilizer exports, Iran aims to exert pressure on its neighbors and force a political reassessment. He notes that the IRGC has prepared for a multi-front war for decades, including building underground missile facilities, allowing it to withstand prolonged attacks. Cooper also suggests that U.S. President Donald Trump's limited patience and waning support for Israel could influence the outcome of future conflicts.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the IRGC's actions as strategic moves aimed at reducing U.S. influence, emphasizing the geopolitical implications and the potential impact on U.S. domestic politics. It highlights the decline in American public opinion towards Israel and suggests that U.S. involvement in Middle东冲突
Why factuality (75): The article reports on an expert analysis by Tom Cooper regarding the IRGC's strategy to target US bases to push the US out of the region before a potential war with Israel. It cites specific locations where Iran launched retaliatory strikes and includes quotes from Cooper. While there is no primary
Why objectivity (60): The article uses emotionally charged language like 'pushing the US out of the region' and frames the IRGC's actions as strategic moves aimed at reducing US influence. It also emphasizes the potential consequences for Gulf states and the economic impact, which may reflect a particular bias towards po
The article reports that Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has vowed to respond to a U.S. strike, according to a statement released by the IRGC's state broadcaster. The report comes amid heightened tensions between Iran and the United States following recent military actions. While the specific details of the U.S. strike and the nature of Iran's planned retaliation are not elaborated upon, the message underscores the ongoing hostility between the two nations. The statement reflects the IRGC's stance of defiance against U.S. military involvement in the region.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the IRGC's vow to retaliate as a justified response to U.S. aggression, aligning with narratives that portray Iran as a victim of Western imperialism. The emphasis on the IRGC's commitment to action suggests a sympathetic portrayal of Iranian sovereignty and resistance against U.S
Why factuality (30): The article provides minimal content, only stating that the IRGC vowed to respond to a US strike as reported by the state broadcaster. There is no additional context, details, or sourcing beyond the claim. This lack of substance makes it difficult to assess factuality accurately, especially without
Why objectivity (40): Although the article is very brief, it lacks any indication of bias or perspective. The phrasing 'state broadcaster IRGC reported' suggests a possible alignment with Iranian state media, but due to the brevity, it is hard to determine if the tone is neutral or influenced by external factors.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.