ON
← Back to feed
Lithuania sees no major disruption from EU's Entry/Exit System, despite problems elsewhere
LT🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

Lithuania sees no major disruption from EU's Entry/Exit System, despite problems elsewhere

Lithuania reports no significant disruptions from the EU's new Entry/Exit System, which automatically records data on non-EU citizens entering 29 European countries. The State Border Guard Service and Lithuanian Airports confirm the system has operated smoothly without queues, delays, or missed flights. The system replaces manual passport checks and aims to track overstays and entry refusals. However, other EU countries and the aviation industry have reported issues, including wait times of up to five hours, prompting calls for more flexibility. The European Commission acknowledges ongoing technical challenges and offers continued support.

Lithuania has reported no significant disruption from the rollout of the European Union’s new Entry/Exit System, despite challenges faced by other EU nations. According to the State Border Guard Service, there were no queues, delays in passenger screening, or missed flights linked to the system during its implementation or since it became fully operational on April 10. Lithuanian Airports also confirmed that the automated system, designed to register and store data on non-EU citizens entering 29 European countries, operated smoothly without causing inconvenience to travelers. The Entry/Exit System, part of the broader EU’s efforts to enhance border security and streamline travel, replaces traditional manual passport stamping. It collects personal and biometric data to monitor overstays and entry refusals. This system is utilized by all EU member states except Ireland and Cyprus, along with Schengen-associated countries such as Switzerland, Norway, and Iceland. In Lithuania, the transition appears to have proceeded without notable issues, according to official reports. Despite this smooth operation in Lithuania, some EU countries and members of the European aviation industry have raised concerns about potential disruptions. Last week, the aviation sector noted that wait times at certain locations had reached up to five hours due to the system. Additionally, nine EU nations have called on Brussels to grant more flexibility in implementing the system during emergency situations. These calls for adjustment reflect growing frustrations among stakeholders who believe the current framework lacks sufficient adaptability. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has acknowledged ongoing technical challenges with the system. Meanwhile, the EU’s home affairs commissioner, Magnus Brunner, has pledged additional support to countries still encountering difficulties. This includes both technical assistance and policy guidance aimed at resolving persistent issues and ensuring smoother operations across the bloc. Border guard statistics show that between April 10 and July 15, 627 individuals were denied entry at Lithuanian border checkpoints for various reasons. During the same period, a total of 822,411 non-EU nationals were processed through the system. These numbers highlight the scale of the system’s operation and suggest that, so far, it has managed to handle the volume of travelers without significant hiccups. The Entry/Exit System represents a key component of the EU’s strategy to modernize border management and improve data sharing among member states. However, the mixed experiences across different countries underscore the complexity of implementing such a large-scale digital infrastructure. While Lithuania’s experience suggests that the system can function effectively under normal conditions, the challenges faced elsewhere indicate that further refinement and coordination will be necessary to ensure consistent performance throughout the EU. As the system continues to operate, ongoing monitoring and adjustments will remain critical to addressing emerging issues and meeting the expectations of both travelers and national authorities.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

LRT (English) logoLRT (English)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 80yesterday
Lithuania sees no major disruption from EU's Entry/Exit System, despite problems elsewhere

Lithuania reports no significant disruptions from the EU's new Entry/Exit System, which automatically records data on non-EU citizens entering 29 European countries. The State Border Guard Service and Lithuanian Airports confirm the system has operated smoothly without queues, delays, or missed flights. The system replaces manual passport checks and aims to track overstays and entry refusals. However, other EU countries and the aviation industry have reported issues, including wait times of up to five hours, prompting calls for more flexibility. The European Commission acknowledges ongoing technical challenges and offers continued support.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view by citing both Lithuania's positive experience with the system and concerns raised by other EU countries and the aviation sector. It does not take a clear ideological stance but rather reports on differing perspectives within the EU regarding the system's impact.

Why factuality (85): The article reports Lithuania's experience with the EU's Entry/Exit System based on official statements from the State Border Guard Service and Lithuanian Airports. It provides specific numbers regarding entries and refusals, aligning with cross-source consensus that Lithuania has not experienced ma

Why objectivity (80): The article presents information from multiple sources, including official statements and reports from the European Commission. It maintains a neutral tone but does include some subjective assessments like 'wider disruption' and references to officials acknowledging technical issues, which slightly

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories