ON
← Back to feed
Lithuania freezes assets of Mere operator after EU sanctions on Russian owner
LT🏛️ PoliticsCenter17 hr. ago

Lithuania freezes assets of Mere operator after EU sanctions on Russian owner

Lithuania's Financial Crime Investigation Service has frozen the assets of Valiante, the local operator of the Russian discount retail chain Mere, following EU sanctions against its indirect owner, Russian businessman Sergey Shnayder. The move affects Valiante and two other companies linked to Shnayder, Next Logistics and Litproduktai, all of which have been added to the service's list of sanctioned entities. According to the agency, Shnayder controls over half of the shares in these companies, triggering the freeze under EU sanctions rules. The EU sanctioned Shnayder for alleged support of actions undermining Ukraine's territorial integrity. As a result, Mere stores in Lithuania abruptly closed due to 'technical obstacles,' and there are concerns that some former Mere associates might continue operating through a new retail chain called Ola.

Lithuania's Financial Crime Investigation Service has frozen the assets of Valiante, the local operator of the Russian discount retail chain Mere, following the European Union’s imposition of sanctions against its indirect owner, Russian businessman Sergey Shnayder. The move affects Valiante, alongside two related companies, Next Logistics and Litproduktai, as they have been listed as sanctioned entities by the Lithuanian authority. The freeze was implemented under EU sanctions rules, which require the freezing of funds held by entities whose ownership exceeds 50% by a sanctioned individual. According to the Financial Crime Investigation Service, Shnayder indirectly controls 79% of Valiante and holds stakes of 74.87% each in Litproduktai and Next Logistics. These companies were added to the sanction list this week, marking a direct consequence of Shnayder’s inclusion in the EU’s 21st package of sanctions. Shnayder was sanctioned by the EU on July 23 for alleged involvement in activities undermining Ukraine’s territorial integrity, sovereignty, and independence. The sanctions extend to operators of the Mere retail chain in Lithuania and other countries, leading to immediate operational halts for the affected businesses. This led to the sudden closure of all Mere stores in Lithuania on July 24, with the retailer attributing the decision to “technical obstacles.” Prior to the closures, Mere operated 26 stores nationwide. Before the shutdown, Mere had been a prominent player in Lithuania’s retail sector, offering discounted goods to a wide customer base. The abrupt closure left many customers without access to the chain’s services and raised concerns among local authorities about potential continuity of operations through alternative channels. The Ministry of Economy and Innovation has voiced worries that individuals connected to Mere might continue their business activities via the recently launched Ola retail chain. Ola has already opened a store in Šiauliai, a town located in northern Lithuania. The situation highlights the broader impact of EU sanctions on businesses operating within member states. While the primary target of the sanctions was Shnayder, the ripple effects have reached local operators such as Valiante, forcing them into compliance with measures beyond their control. The freezing of assets represents a critical enforcement step, ensuring that sanctioned individuals cannot benefit financially from their holdings in Lithuania. The Ministry of Economy and Innovation’s concerns underscore the need for vigilance in monitoring the movement of business activities. With Ola’s new presence in Šiauliai, there is a possibility that some aspects of Mere’s operations could persist under a different brand name. This raises questions about how effectively the EU’s sanctions framework can prevent the continuation of sanctioned business practices through alternative means. As the situation unfolds, further action may be taken to ensure full compliance with EU directives. The Lithuanian government will likely monitor the activities of Ola and other potential outlets to determine whether they are being used to circumvent existing sanctions. Meanwhile, the legal implications for Shnayder and his associates remain under scrutiny, with ongoing investigations into their alleged activities. The outcome of these developments will shape the future of retail operations in Lithuania and set precedents for similar cases.

1 reports

LRT (English) logoLRT (English)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 8017 hr. ago
Lithuania freezes assets of Mere operator after EU sanctions on Russian owner

Lithuania's Financial Crime Investigation Service has frozen the assets of Valiante, the local operator of the Russian discount retail chain Mere, following EU sanctions against its indirect owner, Russian businessman Sergey Shnayder. The move affects Valiante and two other companies linked to Shnayder, Next Logistics and Litproduktai, all of which have been added to the service's list of sanctioned entities. According to the agency, Shnayder controls over half of the shares in these companies, triggering the freeze under EU sanctions rules. The EU sanctioned Shnayder for alleged support of actions undermining Ukraine's territorial integrity. As a result, Mere stores in Lithuania abruptly closed due to 'technical obstacles,' and there are concerns that some former Mere associates might continue operating through a new retail chain called Ola.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding EU sanctions and Lithuania's enforcement of those sanctions against a Russian-owned retail chain. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains neutral, focusing on legal and regulatory遵

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the freezing of assets by Lithuania's Financial Crime Investigation Service following EU sanctions on Sergey Shnayder. It provides specific details about the percentage ownership and the legal basis for the sanctions, aligning with the cross-source consensus. The menti

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts without overt bias. However, it slightly emphasizes the impact on businesses and consumers by mentioning store closures and concerns about continued operations through Ola, which could be seen as a minor editorial tilt.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories