According to a recent survey conducted by the Hebrew University of Jerusalem between June 17 and 20, nearly nine out of ten respondents in Israel believe Iran has emerged victorious from the conflict. The study, which gathered responses from over 3,500 individuals, revealed striking figures. More than 93 percent of supporters of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated they believed Iran had won, while 83 percent claimed the war had weakened Israel's defenses. Additionally, 72.5 percent did not trust Netanyahu when he declared that major goals had been achieved, and 56 percent gave him poor marks for his leadership during the conflict.
The survey also indicated that 48 percent still supported continued military actions against Hezbollah in Beirut, despite the backlash from U.S. President Donald Trump. Conversely, 21 percent were opposed to such actions. Meanwhile, a separate poll by CBS and YouGov in the United States showed that there was little satisfaction with the situation in the region. Seventy-eight percent wanted the war to end immediately, and 69 percent believed the U.S. had failed to prevent Iran’s nuclear program. Furthermore, 74 percent thought conditions in Iran had not improved, with 37 percent favoring the nuclear deal for Iran and 22 percent supporting the U.S. position. Two-thirds of respondents felt the war had not been worth it for the United States.
In parallel developments, diplomatic efforts continue as Iran and the United States engage in talks aimed at ending the conflict in the Middle East. These discussions are taking place in Switzerland, where negotiations are ongoing. A spokesperson for the U.S. delegation mentioned that the talks aim to clarify some of the threatening statements made by Iran regarding the ceasefire and to ensure that the ceasefire remains fully open. The Iranian delegation includes Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, a member of parliament.
Earlier in the evening, Iranian state media reported that the Iranian delegation had left the meeting in protest after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to launch new attacks on Iran due to its support for the Hezbollah movement in Lebanon. However, the spokesperson for the U.S. delegation did not confirm this departure.
Meanwhile, reports indicate that the U.S. intelligence community has advised President Trump to be cautious about actions taken by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who might undermine or even sabotage the president's attempts to achieve a lasting peace agreement with Iran. According to the Washington Post, current and former officials within the U.S. administration have noted that Netanyahu faces significant political pressure from within Israel to continue military operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon, which has received support from the Iranian clerical establishment.
These actions could potentially undermine one of the main provisions of the newly negotiated peace agreement, which calls for an end to hostilities in Lebanon. Intelligence assessments suggest that continued Israeli military operations could damage the fragile relationship between the U.S. and Israel, especially given Trump's public stance on the issue. In recent nights and days, Israeli forces have launched air strikes across southern Lebanon in response to drone attacks by Hezbollah, resulting in four Israeli soldiers losing their lives and at least 47 Lebanese casualties. If Netanyahu continues his military campaign in Lebanon, it could not only jeopardize the peace agreement signed earlier this week by the U.S. and Iran but also strain relations with President Trump, who has been a crucial part of Netanyahu's political success.
3 reports
RÚV FréttirState / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 6514 days agoA new survey conducted by Hebrew University in Jerusalem between June 17–20 found that 92% of Israelis believe Iran has won the conflict in question. Over 3,500 people participated, with results showing strong support for this view among supporters of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who reported over 93% believing Iran had won. The survey also indicated that 83% felt Israel’s defenses were weakened by the war, while 72.5% did not trust Netanyahu’s claims about achieving major goals. Additionally, 56% gave Netanyahu poor marks for his handling of the situation. Notably, 48% still supported continued military actions against Hezbollah in Beirut despite U.S. President Donald Trump’s objections. A separate CBS and YouGov poll in the United States showed similar sentiments, with 78% wanting an end to the conflict and 69% believing the U.S. failed to prevent Iran’s nuclear development.
Bias read (Center): The article presents survey data without overtly favoring any side. It reports findings objectively, including both Israeli and American perspectives, without using biased language or selective sourcing. The framing remains neutral, focusing on statistical results rather than endorsing specific st立场
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): The article presents survey results from Israel showing high confidence in Iran's victory, but frames the data in a way that emphasizes political divisions and public sentiment rather than presenting a neutral analysis. Cross-source consensus suggests similar levels of public opinion, but the articl
Morgunblaðið / mbl.isIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 8515 days agoThe United States and Iran are holding talks in Switzerland aimed at ending the conflict in the Middle East. U.S. Vice President JD Vance is representing the U.S., while Pakistan's Prime Minister Shebaz Sharif and Qatar's Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al-Thani are also involved. The discussions focus on clarifying some of Iran's threatening messages regarding the situation in Syria and ensuring that the conflict remains open. Iran's delegation includes Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and a member of parliament, Mohammed Bagher Ghalibaf. Iranian state media reported earlier in the evening that Iran's delegation had left the meeting in protest after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened new attacks on Iran due to its support for Hezbollah in Lebanon. However, the U.S. representatives were not aware of this response.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of the ongoing negotiations between the U.S. and Iran, including both sides' perspectives and actions. It does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing appears neutral, focusing on the factual reci
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 85): This article reports on diplomatic talks between Iran and the US, providing details on participants and discussions. It remains neutral in tone, focusing on facts without overt bias. The mention of sources like AFP adds credibility, though some context about the broader geopolitical situation is mis
Morgunblaðið / mbl.isIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6017 days ago The Secret Service warns Trump about the Netanyahu cabinetThe US intelligence community has warned President Donald Trump's administration that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu might take actions that could undermine or even derail ongoing peace negotiations with Iran. According to reports from The Washington Post, based on current and former US officials, Netanyahu faces significant domestic pressure to continue Israel's military operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon. These actions risk breaking the core terms of the new peace agreement between Israel and Iran, which aims to end the conflict in Lebanon. Recent Israeli air strikes across southern Lebanon were in response to Hezbollah drone attacks that killed four Israeli soldiers and injured at least 47 Lebanese civilians. If Netanyahu escalates military action in Lebanon, it could not only jeopardize the peace deal but also strain his relationship with Trump, who has been an unpredictable factor in the negotiations.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the situation, citing both the US intelligence warnings and the Israeli perspective regarding domestic pressures. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing that would indicate a clear ideological lean.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 60): The article discusses intelligence warnings about potential Israeli actions affecting U.S.-Iran peace efforts, but uses emotionally charged language ('spill' 'break the pact') and focuses more on political conflict than objective reporting. It also lacks balance by not mentioning opposing viewpoints
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
IS
