Croatia has entered a new chapter in its football history as the immediate future of its national team's head coach, Zlatko Dalić, remains uncertain following the conclusion of the World Cup in Qatar. Dalić, who led Croatia to three major tournament medals—two World Cups and one European Championship—has been silent about his plans since the team's exit from the competition. His contract with the Croatian Football Federation (HNS) expired recently, leaving the federation without an official head coach at this moment. While the HNS had offered him a new deal last year, he did not sign it, raising speculation about whether he will continue in his role or step down.
The uncertainty surrounding Dalić’s future comes after a mixed performance at the World Cup. Despite leading Croatia to a bronze medal at the previous World Cup in Russia and guiding them to the semifinals at the Euro 2020, the team struggled against Portugal in the Round of 16, exiting the tournament in dramatic fashion. Dalić himself admitted to being critical of his first two matches but claimed he eventually adjusted the team's strategy and playstyle. However, the loss to Portugal, which was seen as a significant setback, has reignited discussions about his position as head coach.
Within the HNS, opinions are divided. Many within the executive board believe continuity would benefit Croatian football, especially given the strong foundation Dalić has built over the years. Others, however, see this as an opportunity for a fresh start, potentially with someone like Slaven Bilić, who has expressed interest in taking charge. There are also murmurs that Dalić might consider a move abroad, possibly to manage a top-tier club in Europe, though such ambitions have yet to materialize.
Dalić’s potential successor could be Ivica Olić, who has been working alongside him during training sessions and has shown promise as a young coach. Olić’s presence on the sidelines has been notable, particularly during the World Cup qualifiers where he played a supportive role. If Dalić were to step down, Olić could emerge as a natural choice, though the decision ultimately rests with Dalić himself.
Meanwhile, the relationship between Dalić and HNS president Marijan Kustić has remained amicable despite the uncertainty. Both men have spent considerable time together, often seen socializing and discussing matters both on and off the field. Their bond suggests they have already addressed many issues, and the decision now lies solely with Dalić. Whether he chooses to stay or leave depends on his personal motivations, the challenges he sees ahead, and how he perceives his role within the HNS.
In contrast, the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina offers a different perspective. The country made its second appearance at the World Cup, having previously participated in 2014. Senijad Ibričić, a former player and current sports director of Triglav in Slovenia, praised the progress of the Bosnian team, emphasizing the importance of maintaining stability under head coach Safet Šabanović. Ibričić highlighted the achievements of the younger generation, including players like Edin Džeko and Ervin Zukanović, who have brought renewed hope to Bosnian football.
Despite their early exit from the tournament, the Bosnian team managed to defeat Italy in the group stage, a result that many consider a significant accomplishment. Ibričić believes the team has the potential to become regular participants in international tournaments, provided there is continued support for the coaching staff and a focus on long-term development rather than short-term changes.
As for the future of Croatian football, the coming weeks will be crucial. If Dalić decides to remain, it could provide much-needed stability and continuity. If he leaves, the search for a new head coach will begin, with several names already circulating. Regardless of the outcome, the legacy of Dalić’s tenure will undoubtedly shape the direction of Croatian football moving forward.
2 reports
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 7023 hr. agoThe article discusses the uncertain future of Croatian football coach Zlatko Dalić after his team's elimination from the World Cup. It notes that Dalić has remained silent on whether he will stay or leave, despite having been offered a contract by the Football Association of Croatia (HNS) at the end of last year which he did not sign. Many within the executive board speculate that he might resign, but no definitive information has emerged. The article highlights Dalić’s achievements, including three medals at world championships and a place among the top coaches in Croatian football history. It mentions his high salary and potential earnings elsewhere, though he has not secured a more lucrative position. The piece also considers the implications of Dalić staying or leaving, noting that continuity would please many in Croatian football, while a new beginning could bring changes, potentially with Slaven Bilić as the next coach. The article concludes by emphasizing that the decision ultimately lies with Dalić, who must decide if he still finds motivation and value in his role.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the situation surrounding Zlatko Dalić's potential departure from the national team. It reports on the uncertainty and speculation without taking an overtly positive or negative stance toward any particular outcome. While it acknowledges Dalić's past successes
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): The article provides detailed information about Zlatko Dalić's potential departure from the Croatian national team, citing sources like the HNS president and mentioning his contract details. It aligns with cross-source consensus on his uncertain future. However, it includes subjective opinions about
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 852 days agoThe article discusses Bosnia and Herzegovina's participation in the FIFA World Cup, marking their second appearance after 2014. It highlights the legacy of player Senijad Ibričić, who played for Croatia's Hajduk Split and later became a sports director in Slovenia. Ibričić praises the team's performance, acknowledging their defeat but celebrating their qualification and potential for future success. He emphasizes the importance of continuity under coach Safvet Čengic and criticizes discussions about replacing him, arguing that the current coaching staff has successfully developed young talent. The piece also reflects on the emotional impact of playing alongside legends like Džeko and Kolašinčić, noting the unity and support felt during this World Cup compared to previous experiences.
Bias read (Center): While the article discusses national pride and football politics, it maintains a balanced tone by acknowledging both the team's achievements and challenges. It avoids overtly praising or criticizing specific individuals or policies, focusing instead on collective effort and future prospects. The use
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article accurately reports on Senijad Ibričić’s career and current role as sports director at Triglav, including his comments on Bosnia and Herzegovina’s World Cup performance. It maintains a respectful tone and avoids overt bias, though it ends abruptly without concluding the interview.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Croatia
