ON
← Back to feed
Powerful storm hits Baltic countries, killing 2 and leaving hundreds of thousands without power
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter8/23/2026

Powerful storm hits Baltic countries, killing 2 and leaving hundreds of thousands without power

A powerful storm struck the Baltic countries, resulting in two deaths and leaving hundreds of thousands without power. The cyclone brought heavy rain and strong winds, causing structural damage in Latvia and Lithuania. In Latvia, a building collapse killed one person, while another fatality occurred in Lithuania due to a fallen tree. Over 250,000 residents lost electricity, and transportation systems faced disruptions, including rail services and airport operations. Estonia also experienced strong winds, affecting ferry services and train connections. Officials noted the potential influence of climate change on the storm's intensity, though definitive conclusions remain pending further study.

Gary, Indiana, has become the focal point of growing public outrage after thousands of residents were left without power for more than two weeks following a severe storm. The prolonged outage, which affected nearly all parts of the city, has drawn sharp criticism against the local utility provider, Northern Indiana Public Service Company, known as NIPSCO. The situation has intensified concerns about systemic neglect and disparities in service quality, particularly given that Gary is a predominantly Black community, around 80% of its population, and has historically faced economic challenges due to deindustrialization. The storm, described by officials as nearly equivalent to a Category 2 hurricane, struck Northwest Indiana, impacting three counties: Lake, Porter, and LaPorte. Heavy winds and rainfall caused widespread damage, including significant disruptions to the electrical grid. While the storm’s effects were felt across the region, residents of Gary reported that the restoration of power was notably delayed compared to other areas. Some claimed that the utility company prioritized restoring service to wealthier neighborhoods, leaving lower-income districts without electricity for extended periods. Mayor Eddie Melton, who previously worked for NIPSCO, expressed frustration over the lack of coordinated response. He noted that while he understood the complexities of power restoration, the scale of the challenge in Gary, spanning 52 square miles, required substantial resources and manpower. He emphasized that the city had not received adequate support from neighboring communities, which often provide mutual aid during such crises. “It takes a significant amount of labor and hands on deck to restore a lot of that system,” he stated. Residents of Gary voiced their anger over the situation, many describing the experience as unacceptable in modern times. One resident, speaking on camera, criticized the treatment of the community, saying, “You’ve got to think about Gary is predominantly Black, and look how they’re treating us. It’s terrible out here, man.” Others echoed similar sentiments, highlighting the impact of the blackout on daily life, from being stranded in apartments to businesses closing due to the loss of refrigeration and lighting. The outage also disrupted essential services, with gas stations running out of fuel and grocery stores unable to operate. The economic toll has been significant, with estimates suggesting the storm could result in up to $5 billion in damages across Indiana. Gary, once home to the world’s largest steel mill, has struggled with economic decline since the closure of major industries in the mid-20th century. Today, the city’s population stands at less than 70,000, with roughly a third living below the poverty line. Governor Mike Braun and other officials have called for investigations into NIPSCO’s handling of the crisis, citing concerns over both the speed of restoration and potential discriminatory practices. The governor’s office has urged the utility company to provide greater transparency regarding its operational decisions and resource allocation during emergencies. Meanwhile, city leaders continue to manage the aftermath, working to assist residents whose homes suffered structural damage that further complicated the restoration of power. Despite the progress made, with approximately 95 to 97% of residents currently having electricity again, the city remains in a recovery phase. Mayor Melton acknowledged the ongoing need for financial assistance to help families repair damaged property and regain stability. As the situation unfolds, questions remain about the accountability of private utilities in ensuring equitable service delivery, especially in underserved communities. The incident has sparked broader conversations about infrastructure investment, racial equity, and the role of corporate entities in shaping access to critical services. With no immediate resolution in sight, the focus remains on supporting affected residents and holding responsible parties accountable for the consequences of their actions.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

NPR News logoNPR NewsIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 908/23/2026
Thousands in northwest Indiana still without power nearly two weeks after storm

An article from NPR News reports that thousands of residents in northwest Indiana remain without power nearly two weeks after a storm struck on August 11. The piece includes an image credit for Scott Olson but does not provide specific details about the extent of damage, recovery efforts, or affected communities beyond mentioning the ongoing outage. No additional information is provided about the cause of the outages, the number of households impacted, or any official responses from local authorities.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on the impact of a natural disaster without overtly emphasizing political perspectives or taking a clear ideological stance. It focuses on the immediate effects of the storm and the ongoing situation without commentary on policy, governance, or partisan issues.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that thousands in northwest Indiana were without power nearly two weeks after the storm. It cites the date of the storm (Aug. 11) and includes an image credit, indicating a journalistic approach. However, it lacks specific details about Gary, Indiana, or the demographi

Why objectivity (90): The tone is neutral and factual, focusing on the event itself rather than broader social implications. It avoids taking a stance on the cause of the power outage or the response from local officials, maintaining a balanced perspective throughout the report.

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 808/23/2026
Powerful storm hits Baltic countries, killing 2 and leaving hundreds of thousands without power

A powerful storm struck the Baltic countries, resulting in two deaths and leaving hundreds of thousands without power. The cyclone brought heavy rain and strong winds, causing structural damage in Latvia and Lithuania. In Latvia, a building collapse killed one person, while another fatality occurred in Lithuania due to a fallen tree. Over 250,000 residents lost electricity, and transportation systems faced disruptions, including rail services and airport operations. Estonia also experienced strong winds, affecting ferry services and train connections. Officials noted the potential influence of climate change on the storm's intensity, though definitive conclusions remain pending further study.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a natural disaster without overt ideological framing. While it mentions climate change as a possible factor, it does so through the perspective of a scientific authority rather than taking a partisan stance. The focus remains on the immediate impacts of the风暴

Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details such as the number of deaths, locations affected, wind speeds, and quotes from a meteorological expert. It aligns with typical reporting standards for weather events and matches the cross-source consensus on the severity and impact of the storm. However, the art

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, focusing on the facts of the storm's impact without overt bias. However, there is a slight editorial tilt in mentioning the potential role of climate change at the end, which introduces a speculative element rather than presenting it as a confirmed scientific conclusion.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories