BEFollowing the failure of federal budget negotiations, the Belgian Prime Minister sought advice from the King, who traditionally consults party leaders rather than deputy prime ministers during governmental crises. This move highlights the dominance of 'particracy' in Belgium, where party presidents hold significant power over their respective parties and often influence government decisions more directly than elected executives. The article argues that while party leaders set the political line, their frequent interference can disrupt the collaborative dynamics and trust necessary for effective coalition governance. It suggests that if party presidents wish to exert such control, they should assume ministerial roles themselves, noting that current leader Bart De Wever now experiences the pressure he previously applied as an opposition figure. The piece concludes by questioning whether a government’s success truly depends solely on party leaders, implying that this dynamic undermines the legitimacy of elected officials.
Bias read (Conservative): The article criticizes the erosion of executive authority by party leaders, uses terms like 'polluting' government work, and implies that party-centric governance weakens democratic accountability, reflecting a conservative preference for strong, coherent executive leadership over factional bargaining.
.&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
