More than 20 inches of rain are forecasted for parts of Texas, according to CBS Evening News on July 14. This surge in precipitation comes amid a broader pattern of extreme weather affecting multiple regions of the U.S., with heat warnings stretching from Southern California to the Northeast. Meanwhile, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has reportedly adjusted its tactics following a series of deadly shootings, though details remain unclear. The current weather system has brought record-breaking rainfall to parts of South Texas, triggering severe flooding. Federal data indicates that rainfall intensity in the region west of San Antonio has risen significantly over recent decades. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the latest dataset, published in 2018, shows an increase of 30 to 40 percent in benchmark rainfall events in this area, surpassing nearly all other parts of the state. These findings suggest a growing frequency and severity of extreme precipitation events. Matthew Berg, a principal scientist at the Houston-based risk management firm Simfero, noted that the area west of San Antonio has experienced some of the largest increases in rainfall intensity compared to earlier datasets. He expressed concern that these changes could signal a systemic shift rather than just a statistical anomaly. Berg pointed out that the region's historical flood records already indicated a higher baseline risk than previously modeled, raising questions about whether the current climate is evolving beyond historical norms. Recent weeks have seen a major flooding disaster in South Texas, marking the second such event in as many years. Towns like Uvalde and Sabinal recorded four-day rainfall totals that exceeded historical benchmarks. These totals were classified by federal models as 1,000-year rain events, meaning they have less than a 0.1 percent chance of occurring in any given year. Similarly, the 2025 flooding along the Guadalupe River was also labeled a 1,000-year event. Berg warned that the inclusion of storms from 2025 and 2026 in future analyses will likely lead to even higher risk assessments for the region. The implications of these findings extend beyond academic interest. Risk estimates derived from federal models play a critical role in shaping local building codes and infrastructure planning. Most jurisdictions require structures to be built to withstand a 100-year storm, defined as an event with a 1 percent annual probability. However, the outdated 1961 Rainfall Frequency Atlas, used by many localities, has been superseded by NOAA’s updated Atlas 14, which reflects a substantial increase in peak rainfall intensity across much of Texas, particularly in areas west of San Antonio and near Houston. John Nielsen-Gammon, Texas state climatologist and professor of atmospheric sciences at Texas A&M University, confirmed that the updated data aligns with expectations from climate change. He explained that warmer air can hold more moisture, resulting in stronger downpours. As global temperatures continue to rise, forecasters anticipate further intensification of rainfall events nationwide. A 2024 assessment by the state climatologist’s office echoed this outlook, predicting that extreme precipitation will become more frequent and severe due to rising temperatures. The heightened rainfall in the Houston area, as reflected in Atlas 14, is partly attributed to improved measurement techniques and modeling capabilities. Notably, the inclusion of Hurricane Harvey in 2017—an unprecedented rainfall event in U.S. history, played a key role in updating regional projections. Even prior to Harvey, researchers had observed a long-term trend toward more frequent and intense rainfall episodes.
3 reports
Inside Climate NewsIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 854 days agoRecent heavy rainfall events in South Texas have raised concerns about the accuracy of precipitation models used to assess flood risks. Federal data shows that rainfall intensity has increased significantly in the region west of San Antonio, with estimates from the 2018 NOAA Atlas 14 showing up to a 40% increase compared to older datasets. This has led experts like Matthew Berg to question whether current models underestimate the risk of extreme weather events, such as '1,000-year' rainstorms, which are now being recorded more frequently. Recent flooding in areas like Uvalde and Sabinal, along with the 2025 Guadalupe River flood, highlights growing concerns about the adequacy of existing risk assessments. These models influence local building codes and infrastructure planning, raising questions about how well communities are prepared for future climate impacts.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue of outdated precipitation models as a systemic problem that requires urgent attention, emphasizing the potential consequences of inadequate risk assessment. It highlights expert concerns about the reliability of current models and suggests that updating them could leadto
Why factuality (90): The article cites federal data from NOAA and quotes a scientific expert, providing detailed analysis of rainfall trends and modeling inaccuracies. It accurately reflects the cross-source consensus regarding increasing rainfall intensity and model underestimation of risk.
Why objectivity (85): The tone remains informative and objective, focusing on scientific findings and expert commentary without introducing subjective language or emotional appeal.
CBS News (US)IndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 807 days agoThe article reports on extreme weather conditions affecting different regions of the United States. Heavy rainfall is impacting Texas, while areas ranging from Southern California to the Northeast are experiencing heat warnings. The report includes a weather forecast update provided by Rob Marciano.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on weather conditions without taking a clear ideological stance. It focuses on the environmental impact and provides a forecast update without commentary on policy, governance, or societal implications related to climate change or disaster management.
Why factuality (75): The article reports on weather conditions affecting Texas and other parts of the U.S., aligning with the cross-source consensus that heavy rain hit Texas and extreme heat impacted other regions. It does not provide specific data or sources beyond the general statement, but remains consistent with ot
Why objectivity (80): The tone is neutral, presenting the weather forecast without emotional language or bias. The focus is on reporting the forecast rather than taking sides or expressing personal opinion.
ABC News (US)IndependentCenter7 hr. agoA small town in rural Texas is challenging the Trump administration's plan to construct a border wall through a levee system that protects the area from flooding. The town argues that the wall could increase flood risks and that the administration is violating legal requirements by proceeding without proper approvals from the Army Corps of Engineers. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is moving forward with a $46 billion project to build a wall from the Pacific Ocean to the Gulf of Mexico, despite opposition from landowners, environmental groups, and Native American tribes who claim the construction threatens sacred sites and disrupts local communities. The dispute highlights tensions between local governments and federal authorities. The government maintains it has the authority to bypass regulations under the guise of national security.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the issue: the town's concerns about flooding and legal compliance versus the government's argument about national security and regulatory waivers. There is no overtly biased language, and the piece includes perspectives from both the plaintiffs and the government.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
United States
