ON
← Back to feed
Lamar Jackson Reacts to His Controversial NFL Top 100 Ranking
United States⚽ Sportsyesterday

Lamar Jackson Reacts to His Controversial NFL Top 100 Ranking

Lamar Jackson, a two-time NFL Most Valuable Player, was ranked No. 69 on the 2026 NFL Top 100 list, a significant decline from his previous year’s ranking. This drop has caused controversy within the league, especially considering Jackson's performance in 2025, which included missing four games due to injury. Despite completing 63.6% of his passes for 2,549 yards, 21 touchdowns, and seven interceptions, Jackson had a career-low rushing total of 349 yards and struggled as his team, the Baltimore Ravens, finished with an 8-9 record and missed the playoffs. When asked about his ranking, Jackson responded nonchalantly, stating he does not place importance on such evaluations.

Lamar Jackson, the two-time NFL Most Valuable Player, responded to his placement on the 2026 NFL Top 100 list, which placed him at number 69—a significant drop from his rank of 2 in 2025. The ranking, determined by votes from active NFL players, has ignited debate within the league and among fans. Jackson, who missed four games during the 2025 season due to injury, acknowledged the result during a press conference at training camp on Wednesday. “It is what it is,” he stated, according to ProFootballTalk. “You know, I play football. I don’t care about rankings.” The 2025 season proved challenging for Jackson and the Baltimore Ravens. He completed 63.6% of his pass attempts for 2,549 yards, throwing for 21 touchdowns while also recording seven interceptions. On the ground, Jackson, known for his dual-threat abilities, managed just 349 rushing yards and two touchdowns, his lowest output since entering the league. Despite these numbers, Jackson remained a key figure for the team, leading them through a difficult campaign. The Ravens finished with an 8-9 record, failing to secure a playoff berth despite entering the season with hopes of contending for a Super Bowl title. Jackson’s absence from the field further complicated matters. With 13 games played, the Ravens posted a 6-7 record during his participation. While injuries have affected the team’s performance, critics argue that Jackson’s lower ranking reflects more than just his personal struggles. Some analysts suggest that the voting process, which relies heavily on subjective opinions rather than objective statistics, may have contributed to the disparity. Others point to the overall performance of the Ravens, noting that the team struggled to support Jackson effectively throughout the season. Jackson’s reaction to the ranking underscores his focus on playing football over external validation. During his press session, he emphasized his commitment to the game and his team. “I’m here to win,” he said, adding that the ranking does not define his value or impact on the field. This sentiment aligns with his long-standing approach to handling criticism, often prioritizing preparation and performance over public perception. The Ravens are set to begin their 2026 season with a matchup against the Indianapolis Colts on September 13. The team faces the challenge of rebuilding its roster and improving its defensive capabilities, both of which were cited as areas needing attention following the 2025 season. Jackson, though not the focal point of the team’s struggles, remains a central figure in the franchise’s future. His ability to contribute both as a passer and a runner will be crucial in determining how far the Ravens can go in the upcoming season. As the NFL prepares for another season of competition, the conversation surrounding Jackson’s ranking continues to evolve. While some players and analysts question the methodology behind the Top 100 list, others see it as a reflection of the current state of the league. For Jackson, however, the focus remains on the field. With the Ravens looking to bounce back, the quarterback is ready to put his performance, and his reputation, on the line once again.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Newsweek logoNewsweekIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 75yesterday
Lamar Jackson Reacts to His Controversial NFL Top 100 Ranking

Lamar Jackson, a two-time NFL Most Valuable Player, was ranked No. 69 on the 2026 NFL Top 100 list, a significant decline from his previous year’s ranking. This drop has caused controversy within the league, especially considering Jackson's performance in 2025, which included missing four games due to injury. Despite completing 63.6% of his passes for 2,549 yards, 21 touchdowns, and seven interceptions, Jackson had a career-low rushing total of 349 yards and struggled as his team, the Baltimore Ravens, finished with an 8-9 record and missed the playoffs. When asked about his ranking, Jackson responded nonchalantly, stating he does not place importance on such evaluations.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses solely on sports-related content—specifically, the NFL Top 100 rankings and Lamar Jackson's performance and reaction to them. There is no mention of politics, policy, or any contentious social issues. The framing remains neutral, presenting facts about Jackson's ranking, stats,球队

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Lamar Jackson's rank on the NFL Top 100 list and provides context about his performance in 2025 including stats and team results. It references the drop from last year's ranking and mentions his response to the ranking. While it does not include direct quotes from the

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the controversy surrounding Jackson's ranking but frames it through Jackson's perspective and quotes. There is a slight bias toward acknowledging the controversy while emphasizing Jackson's indifference to rankings, though it remains relatively neutral overall.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories