ON
← Back to feed
Ladakh to withdraw cases against 25 persons booked for violence during statehood protests
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter2 days ago

Ladakh to withdraw cases against 25 persons booked for violence during statehood protests

The Ladakh administration has announced plans to withdraw criminal cases against 25 individuals who were accused of participating in violent protests on September 24 in Leh, which demanded Ladakh's statehood and inclusion in the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution. The protests turned violent, resulting in four deaths and 50 injuries, with demonstrators clashing with security forces. Activist Sonam Wangchuk was previously arrested under the National Security Act and labeled the 'chief provocateur' by the central government, but his detention was later revoked. On Thursday, Ladakh's Chief Secretary stated that 87 people were initially charged, with chargesheets filed against nine of them. The decision to drop cases against 25 individuals followed discussions with the Lieutenant Governor. This comes after representatives from pro-statehood groups met with the Ministry of Home Affairs, submitting a list of demands, including financial autonomy and a separate Public Service Commission for Ladakh.

Ladakh authorities have announced they will withdraw criminal cases against 25 individuals who were charged in connection with violent protests in Leh on September 24, according to reports. These demonstrations, which demanded statehood for Ladakh and its inclusion in the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, turned deadly when four people were killed in police firing and 50 others sustained injuries. The unrest followed clashes between protesters and security forces, with demonstrators throwing stones at law enforcement personnel. The decision to drop charges comes amid ongoing negotiations between local leaders and the central government over Ladakh's political status. On Thursday, Ladakh Chief Secretary Ashish Kundra stated that 87 individuals had been booked for their roles in the violence, with chargesheets already filed against nine of them. However, after consultations with the Lieutenant Governor, the administration opted to withdraw cases against 25 of these individuals. This move follows a meeting held in Leh on Wednesday between representatives of the Kargil Democratic Alliance and the Leh Apex Body, two prominent groups advocating for Ladakh's statehood, and officials from the Ministry of Home Affairs. During this meeting, the activists presented a list of non-negotiable demands to the Union government. These included granting financial powers to the proposed elected Ladakh Legislative Assembly, establishing a separate Public Service Commission for recruiting government employees within the Union Territory, and the unconditional withdrawal of all legal proceedings against those impacted by the September 24 violence. Sonam Wangchuk, an activist previously detained under the National Security Act, attended the meeting. He had been arrested two days after the protests, with the Union government accusing him of being the "chief provocateur" behind the violence. His detention was lifted on March 14, following which he continued to play a role in the movement for Ladakh's statehood. The protests initially erupted due to longstanding demands for greater autonomy and representation for Ladakh, which has historically been part of Jammu and Kashmir. The region was separated from Jammu and Kashmir in 2019, becoming a union territory with a special administrative structure. Despite this change, many residents continue to push for full statehood, citing issues such as governance, resource allocation, and cultural preservation. The withdrawal of cases against some protestors reflects the evolving dynamics between local leadership and the central government. While the administration has taken steps to address certain grievances, the broader issue of Ladakh's political future remains unresolved. The central government has yet to formally respond to the demands put forth during the recent meeting, leaving the situation in flux. The decision to drop charges against 25 individuals highlights the complex interplay between law enforcement actions and political negotiations. It also underscores the sensitivity surrounding the issue of Ladakh's status, which continues to be a point of contention among local leaders, activists, and policymakers. As discussions progress, further developments are anticipated regarding how the central government will address the demands raised by the protest movement.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Scroll.in logoScroll.inIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 902 days ago
Ladakh to withdraw cases against 25 persons booked for violence during statehood protests

The Ladakh administration has announced plans to withdraw criminal cases against 25 individuals who were accused of participating in violent protests on September 24 in Leh, which demanded Ladakh's statehood and inclusion in the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution. The protests turned violent, resulting in four deaths and 50 injuries, with demonstrators clashing with security forces. Activist Sonam Wangchuk was previously arrested under the National Security Act and labeled the 'chief provocateur' by the central government, but his detention was later revoked. On Thursday, Ladakh's Chief Secretary stated that 87 people were initially charged, with chargesheets filed against nine of them. The decision to drop cases against 25 individuals followed discussions with the Lieutenant Governor. This comes after representatives from pro-statehood groups met with the Ministry of Home Affairs, submitting a list of demands, including financial autonomy and a separate Public Service Commission for Ladakh.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the Ladakh administration's decision to withdraw cases against some protestors, along with background on the protests and related arrests. It includes perspectives from both the administration and the protest groups without overtly favoring one side. No

Why factuality (95): The article accurately summarizes the primary source document, citing the withdrawal of cases against 25 individuals, the number of people booked (87), and the involvement of KDA and LAB. It correctly mentions Sonam Wangchuk's arrest and release, aligning closely with the original report. Minor omis

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone overall, presenting facts without overt bias. However, it uses phrases like 'chief provocateur' which may imply judgment, though this term appears in the original source as well. The article avoids strong editorializing and presents events objectively.

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 802 days ago
Ahead of MHA-Ladakh talks in September, Centre’s outreach sees withdrawal of cases against Leh protestors

In 2025, four civilians were killed and approximately 90 people, including security personnel, were injured during protests in Leh, Ladakh, driven by demands for statehood and the Sixth Schedule. Ahead of planned MHA-Ladakh talks in September 2026, the Ladakh administration announced plans to withdraw cases against 25 individuals deemed to have minimal or no involvement in the violence, while charge sheets were filed against nine others with sufficient evidence. Civil society groups, including the Leh Apex Body (LAB) and Kargil Democratic Alliance (KDA), had previously submitted non-negotiable demands for case withdrawals and compensation for victims. The LAB claimed that unarmed civilians were shot by security forces without proper authorization. The administration aims to hold formal discussions with the MHA in September to address legislative and constitutional provisions for Ladakh, following meetings between local leaders and MHA representatives.

Bias read (Center): While the issue of Ladakh's autonomy and legal status is politically sensitive, the article presents information from both administrative actions and civil society demands without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the administration's decision to review cases and the civil society's push,撮

Why factuality (85): The article aligns closely with the primary source document from The Indian Express, accurately reporting the number of people booked, the withdrawal of cases against 25 individuals, and the ongoing discussions with the MHA. It mentions the September 24, 2025 violence and the casualties, though it s

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the information in a neutral tone, focusing on the facts and official statements. However, it uses phrases like 'ahead of MHA-Ladakh talks' and 'Centre’s outreach' which may imply a slight editorial stance favoring the government's actions, though not overtly biased.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories