Labour will hike taxes at the Budget, two thirds of Brits predict in new poll ahead of 'critical test' for Chancellor
A new Ipsos poll indicates that nearly two-thirds of British citizens anticipate Labour to raise taxes during Chancellor John Healey's first Budget as part of Prime Minister Andy Burnham's government. The survey reveals widespread concern over the economy, with 58% of respondents believing the nation is moving in the 'wrong direction.' Public expectations include potential increases in taxes on banks, capital gains, and bookmakers, despite Labour having already raised the tax burden to a post-war high. Meanwhile, a separate poll commissioned by the trade union UNISON suggests strong public support for taxing the wealthy, large corporations, and banks to fund public services.
Chancellor John Healey is preparing to increase taxes on the United Kingdom’s banking sector in his upcoming Budget, senior industry executives have indicated. The move aims to generate additional revenue to repair public finances strained by the ongoing conflict in the Middle East and rising government borrowing costs. Healey, who is currently attending International Monetary Fund meetings in Bangkok, stated that he has decisions to make regarding the sector ahead of the Budget scheduled for October 28. While he praised banks as integral to the nation’s economic fabric, he acknowledged that the sector is likely to face higher levies. This potential tax hike follows a period of exceptional profitability for major lenders, driven by elevated interest rates, and responds to sustained pressure from trade unions and think tanks demanding that banks contribute a larger share of tax revenue. The primary mechanism under consideration involves reversing a reduction in the surcharge applied to bank profits. In 2023, the previous Conservative government, led by Chancellor Jeremy Hunt, lowered this surcharge from 8 percent to 3 percent. Treasury officials are reportedly leaning toward restoring the surcharge closer to its previous level, as modifying an existing tax is administratively simpler than introducing a new windfall tax. Reversing the 2023 cut entirely would raise approximately £2 billion annually. However, concerns remain that imposing the full 8 percent surcharge on top of the standard 25 percent corporation tax could render UK banks less competitive compared to European and American rivals. Consequently, the final rate may settle somewhere between the current 3 percent and the historical 8 percent. For banks with profits exceeding £100 million, the combined tax burden currently stands at 28 percent; a return to the 8 percent surcharge would raise this combined rate to 33 percent. Market reaction to the anticipated changes began immediately upon the emergence of these reports. Shares in Lloyds Banking Group and NatWest fell by more than 2 percent on Friday, placing them among the worst performers on the UK stock market. In contrast, shares in Barclays dipped only slightly, while HSBC shares actually rose. Analysts noted that Barclays and HSBC maintain substantial international operations, which insulates them partially from a UK-specific tax increase. The banking industry trade body, UK Finance, issued a warning that further tax increases would weaken the sector’s competitiveness, discourage investment, and hinder job creation, arguing such measures run counter to the government’s goal of delivering growth across all regions. Support for the proposed tax hike is evident among labour representatives and certain policy groups. Paul Nowak, general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, highlighted that the four largest banks are generating roughly £1 billion in profit weekly, with bonuses reaching post-crisis highs. Nowak attributed these profits to high interest rates and the financial strain placed on households through mortgages. He argued that the Treasury has already lost £6 billion in revenue due to the previous administration’s tax cuts and that it is time for banks to pay their fair share. The TUC has previously advocated for an even more aggressive approach, proposing a 16 percent surcharge that could yield £24 billion in revenue over four years. Similarly, the Institute for Public Policy Research recommended a temporary surcharge on commercial banks’ windfall profits as part of a broader package to raise £16 billion to assist struggling households. The think tank noted that the Chancellor’s fiscal buffer has shrunk by up to £15 billion since the spring. Public sentiment appears divided but leans toward acceptance of higher taxes on the wealthy and corporate entities. An Ipsos poll conducted recently found that 65 percent of Britons expect Labour to announce tax rises in the coming Budget, compared to just 5 percent who anticipate tax cuts. The same survey revealed that 58 percent of respondents believe the country is heading in the wrong direction, while only 18 percent feel things are improving. Conversely, a separate YouGov poll commissioned by the trade union UNISON showed stronger support for specific targets, with 69 percent of people backing increased taxes on the wealthiest individuals to fund public services. Additionally, three-quarters of respondents supported larger contributions from large corporations, and 61 percent favored tax rises specifically for banks. UNISON general secretary Andrea Egan described the potential move as encouraging, stating that massive investment to rebuild public services should be funded by taxing the wealthiest. The political context for the Budget is complex. Chancellor Healey operates under constraints imposed by Labour’s 2024 manifesto, which pledged not to raise income tax, value added tax, or national insurance. This limits his options for raising revenue, pushing attention toward sectors like banking, capital gains tax, and potentially family business inheritance rules. The urgency of the situation is underscored by the UK’s high debt levels, with net accumulated public sector debt reaching 93.8 percent of gross domestic product by the end of August. Rising borrowing costs, exacerbated by inflationary pressures linked to the Middle East conflict, have threatened to halve the £24 billion fiscal cushion established in the March spring forecast. A Treasury spokesperson declined to comment on specific proposals, stating that tax decisions are matters for the Chancellor to outline at fiscal events rather than responding to speculation. Industry experts offer mixed views on the feasibility of the hike. Sir Philip Augar, a former banker and author, suggested there is room for a moderate increase that could raise up to £3 billion annually, citing the booming conditions in the lending market. He criticized the notion that banks are simultaneously too big to fail and too big to tax, arguing that taxpayers should not bear the burden during downturns while banks enjoy special treatment during booms. On the other hand, Louise Hellem, chief economist at the Confederation of British Industries, warned that the Budget should avoid measures that undermine competitiveness. She emphasized that the business tax contribution is already at a record share of receipts and that further sector-specific taxation could weaken incentives to invest and deepen UK capital markets. As the October 28 deadline approaches, the focus remains on how Healey balances the need for revenue against the risks of stifling the financial sector’s growth.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Senior banking executives have indicated to the BBC that they anticipate facing increased taxation in the upcoming Budget announcement by Chancellor Rachel Reeves. The statement suggests that the government is considering measures that could impact bank profits. This comes amid ongoing discussions about fiscal policies and potential changes to taxation structures. The banks' concerns reflect broader economic considerations and possible responses to financial sector regulations.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a neutral report on the expectations of banking executives regarding potential tax changes in the Budget. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The focus is on conveying the anticipation of the banking sector rather than promoting a议
Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about potential tax changes targeting the banking sector, citing sources such as UK Finance and mentioning specific figures like the £15bn profit of the four major banks. It references the possible reversal of the 2023 surcharge reduction and mentions the im
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the situation in a relatively neutral manner, discussing both the potential tax increases and the concerns raised by the banking sector. It avoids overtly biased language but does mention the drop in bank shares, which may subtly imply negative consequences.
The UK Chancellor, John Healey, is reportedly considering increasing taxes on bank profits as part of his plans to address the country's financial challenges. This potential measure comes ahead of his first Budget announcement scheduled for October 28. The move suggests a focus on generating additional revenue through financial sector taxation, which could impact banking institutions operating in the UK. Such a decision would be part of broader fiscal strategies aimed at stabilizing the nation's economy.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on potential tax measures being considered by the Chancellor without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It does not include biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omissions that would indicate a clear ideological lean.
Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports that Healey is considering increasing taxes on banks, referencing the TUC and polling data. It mentions the reversal of the 2023 surcharge reduction and the potential £2bn raise. However, it lacks some specifics found in other articles, such as the exact figures for ba
Why objectivity (70): The article leans slightly toward supporting the idea of taxing banks, citing public opinion and union pressure. It includes direct quotes from Healey and the TUC leader, but the overall tone suggests a positive view of the proposed tax measures.
A new Ipsos poll indicates that nearly two-thirds of British citizens anticipate Labour to raise taxes during Chancellor John Healey's first Budget as part of Prime Minister Andy Burnham's government. The survey reveals widespread concern over the economy, with 58% of respondents believing the nation is moving in the 'wrong direction.' Public expectations include potential increases in taxes on banks, capital gains, and bookmakers, despite Labour having already raised the tax burden to a post-war high. Meanwhile, a separate poll commissioned by the trade union UNISON suggests strong public support for taxing the wealthy, large corporations, and banks to fund public services.
Bias read (Center): The article presents findings from two polls with balanced perspectives: one highlighting public concerns about potential tax hikes and economic anxiety, and another showing public support for taxing the wealthy and corporations. There is no overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission.
Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports the Ipsos poll findings regarding public expectations of tax increases and the critical test facing Chancellor John Healey. It references the previous tax hikes by Rachel Reeves and mentions potential areas of focus for the Budget. However, it lacks specific details ab
Why objectivity (65): The article uses emotive language such as 'pain to come' and 'stubbornly subdued by historic standards' which may influence reader perception. While it presents poll data objectively, the phrasing suggests a somewhat negative outlook on the government's economic policies.
Financial TimesIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 85
The UK Chancellor has indicated plans to increase taxes on the banking sector in the upcoming Budget, signaling potential new financial burdens for the industry. The financial services sector is preparing for possible higher levies, which could impact operations and profitability. This move comes amid ongoing discussions about fiscal policies and the role of the banking sector in the economy. The announcement highlights the government’s focus on generating additional revenue through targeted taxation measures.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the proposed tax increases on banks as a proactive measure by the government to address fiscal needs, suggesting a progressive stance on redistributing wealth and increasing state revenue through taxation of financial institutions. The emphasis on 'raiding' banks implies criticism
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (85): The article remains neutral in tone, simply stating that Healey has signaled potential tax changes without expressing approval or criticism. It presents the facts without editorializing or taking a clear stance.
Daily MailIndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 75
The article discusses potential changes to taxation policies affecting family businesses in the UK, specifically focusing on the possibility of increasing taxes related to passing down a business to the next generation. According to the report, Chancellor John Healey might propose such measures in the upcoming Budget to generate additional revenue. The piece invites readers to participate in a poll regarding whether they believe this tax should be increased. The results of the poll will be published in the following day’s Morning Mail newsletter.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the proposed tax increase as a 'Labour tax raid,' implying criticism of the Labour Party's fiscal approach. This phrasing suggests a negative perspective toward the policy, aligning with a left-leaning critique of potential increases in taxation on family businesses.
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (75): The article remains neutral in its presentation, inviting reader input without taking a stance on the proposed tax changes. Its interactive nature allows readers to form their own opinions, maintaining a balanced approach.
Daily MailIndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 60
The article discusses growing speculation that the UK Chancellor, Jeremy Healey, may introduce a new tax on bank profits in the upcoming Budget. This potential measure aims to generate additional revenue but has raised concerns that it could lead to increased business costs and higher mortgage rates. The proposal suggests imposing an extra levy on top of existing corporation tax, which would affect the banking sector significantly. While the move is seen as a way to address financial sector profitability, critics warn of possible negative economic impacts.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the proposed tax as a potential 'Budget tax raid' on banks, suggesting a critical stance toward the financial sector and implying that the measure is politically motivated rather than economically necessary. The emphasis on 'fears it will drive up business costs and mortgage rates
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (60): The article takes a more critical stance, highlighting the potential negative effects of the tax increase on business costs and mortgage rates. It uses phrases like 'clobber' which suggest a negative view of the proposed tax measures.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
United Kingdom
