The Colombian health regulator, the Superintendencia Nacional de Salud, has expressed concern over rising complaint rates among three major health insurance companies, Sanitas, Salud Total, and SURA, while the rest of the sector shows improvement. According to a statement released earlier this week, these three entities have recorded an increase in their complaint indicators between May and June 2026, contrary to the overall trend of declining complaints across the industry. The Superintendencia noted that the national average for complaints dropped from 37.57 in March to 35.04 in June, representing a nearly 7% decrease, indicating a positive shift in the performance of most health providers. The situation comes amid ongoing challenges within the country’s healthcare system, which has been under strain for more than three years. Reports indicate a decline in patient care quality, medication availability, specialist access, and service continuity. These factors have contributed to growing dissatisfaction among users. In response, the Ministry of Health has taken steps to recover misallocated funds, with officials suggesting that certain entities may be held accountable for unauthorized financial transactions. On Tuesday, May 28, representatives from SURA submitted an official request to the National Government seeking to withdraw from the national health system. This move follows mounting pressure and criticism over the company’s performance. The decision was reportedly based on internal assessments highlighting persistent issues affecting service delivery and user satisfaction. The Superintendencia emphasized that while the majority of health providers are improving their complaint metrics, Sanitas, Salud Total, and SURA are deviating from this trend. The agency warned that it will conduct inspections and monitoring activities to assess compliance with regulatory standards. If violations are found, appropriate sanctions could follow. “We observe with concern that, while the majority of EPSs are reducing their complaint indicators, these three entities are increasing theirs,” stated Juan David Duque, the Superintendence’s delegate for user protection. He added that the sector as a whole continues to show progress, but these companies are moving against that direction. In addition to the regulatory concerns, other organizations have raised alarms about broader systemic failures. A recent report from the Fundación Canguro highlighted that eight premature infants may have suffered preventable blindness due to inadequate medical care. Meanwhile, Afidro, another watchdog group, issued a warning regarding the operational status of the New EPS, raising questions about its ability to meet basic service requirements. The rising complaint rates among Sanitas, Salud Total, and SURA suggest deeper structural problems within these institutions. While the national average indicates some level of recovery, the divergence in performance highlights disparities in service quality across different providers. As the Superintendencia prepares to take further action, stakeholders remain watchful for potential interventions that could reshape the landscape of public health provision in Colombia. The coming weeks will likely see increased scrutiny and possible regulatory responses aimed at addressing these discrepancies.
3 reports
SemanaIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 654 days agoThe National Health Superintendence has expressed concern over the rising complaint rates of three health insurance providers—Sanitas, Salud Total, and SURA—while the overall sector has seen a decline in such complaints. The entity noted that the general indicator of complaints dropped by nearly 7% between March and June 2026, indicating improvement across most EPS companies. However, these three EPSs showed worsening performance during the same period. The Superintendence emphasized that while the health system has been recovering from a severe decline over the past three years, these specific EPSs are moving against the broader trend. Actions including inspections and potential sanctions could follow if non-compliance is found.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data on the performance of specific EPS companies relative to the national trend, without overtly favoring any particular side. It reports concerns raised by the National Health Superintendence but does not take a stance on the underlying issues or assign blame.
Why factuality (75): The article reports on the Colombian health system's performance based on data from the Superintendencia Nacional de Salud. It mentions specific EPS (Sanitas, Salud Total, SURA) showing increased complaint rates while others decreased, aligning with the cross-source consensus. However, some details
Why objectivity (65): The tone leans slightly towards concern about the health system's state, particularly highlighting the issues with certain EPS. While not overtly biased, the emphasis on negative trends may reflect a more critical perspective than a purely neutral stance.
La Silla VacíaIndependentCenteryesterdayThe article discusses the expectations and challenges facing the new Colombian president regarding healthcare governance. It highlights the transition from campaign promises to actual implementation, emphasizing the need for concrete solutions rather than further conflict. The piece outlines three main points: the shift from candidate to governing leader, the reliance on campaign promises as a foundation for policy, and the challenges ahead for the president and his health minister in building consensus to improve healthcare quality. It contrasts two potential approaches—responsible governance versus populist demagoguery—and notes that while all candidates acknowledged two crises (acute and structural), there were differences in proposed solutions, particularly regarding the structure of the healthcare system.
Bias read (Center): While the article addresses politically charged topics such as healthcare reform and governance, it presents a balanced view by discussing both potential paths for leadership (responsible vs. populist) and acknowledging differing perspectives among candidates. There is no clear ideological slant in詞
El EspectadorIndependentCenteryesterdayThe article reports that the Colombian presidency has signed a contract for the possession of De la Espriella, which will incur costs. The headline suggests that the agreement has been finalized and highlights the financial implications of this action.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding the signing of a contract by the presidency without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It focuses on the administrative action and its associated costs rather than taking a clear ideological position.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
CO
