ON
← Back to feed
Abelard's possession of a military base: symbols and civilian power
CO🏛️ PoliticsProgressive4 hr. ago

Abelard's possession of a military base: symbols and civilian power

The article discusses the controversy surrounding President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella's intention to take office at a military base rather than before Congress, as stipulated by the 1991 Constitution. It argues that this decision challenges the traditional understanding of presidential legitimacy, which is rooted in civilian institutions and democratic representation. The piece references Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau to emphasize that sovereignty resides with the people, not with those who wield force. While acknowledging the potential legitimacy of supporting the military, the article warns that holding the inauguration at a military site risks shifting the symbolic power from the civilian state to the armed forces.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

La Silla Vacía logoLa Silla VacíaIndependentProgressive4 hr. ago
Abelard's possession of a military base: symbols and civilian power

The article discusses the controversy surrounding President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella's intention to take office at a military base rather than before Congress, as stipulated by the 1991 Constitution. It argues that this decision challenges the traditional understanding of presidential legitimacy, which is rooted in civilian institutions and democratic representation. The piece references Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau to emphasize that sovereignty resides with the people, not with those who wield force. While acknowledging the potential legitimacy of supporting the military, the article warns that holding the inauguration at a military site risks shifting the symbolic power from the civilian state to the armed forces.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the military inauguration as a departure from democratic norms and emphasizes civilian sovereignty over military authority. It critiques the symbolism of using a military setting for a civilian-led transition, suggesting a left-leaning concern about the concentration of power in军事

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories