ON
← Back to feed
How much did the Government pay for each law passed in Congress, according to Marcela Pagano's complaint against Milei and Caputo
AR🏛️ PoliticsCenter11 days ago

How much did the Government pay for each law passed in Congress, according to Marcela Pagano's complaint against Milei and Caputo

The article reports on a legal complaint filed by National Deputy Marcela Pagano against President Javier Milei and Economy Minister Luis Caputo, alleging misuse of funds generated by the Liquified Hydrocarbons Tax (ICL). According to Pagano’s claims, the government used these funds, intended exclusively for road maintenance and construction, to pressure provincial governors and secure rapid approval of legislative projects. The ICL was established under Law 23.966, creating a dedicated fund for the Integrated Road System (SisVial), which is meant to finance infrastructure work. However, Pagano argues that payments to provinces were timed to coincide with legislative voting schedules, suggesting a pattern of using financial incentives to influence votes. Previous investigations by *Perfil* and *La Nación* had already revealed that over $1.35 billion has been collected since Luis Caputo took office but not allocated for road maintenance. The article highlights concerns about the mismanagement of public resources and the potential politicization of infrastructure funding.

A political firestorm erupted in Argentina after opposition lawmaker Marcela Pagano filed criminal charges against key members of President Javier Milei’s government, accusing them of misappropriating nearly 4 billion pesos in public funds. The dispute, which has escalated into a bitter war of words and legal threats, centers on the whereabouts of surplus money from a July debt auction. Pagano's allegations have drawn sharp responses from Economy Minister Luis Caputo and Milei himself, who took to social media to attack her credibility and accuse her of spreading falsehoods. The controversy began during a press conference when Santiago Bausili, head of the central bank, was asked about the location of leftover funds from a July 29 debt auction. His response, suggesting the money could be found somewhere, though he did not specify, was seized upon by Pagano as evidence of potential wrongdoing. She promptly filed formal complaints with federal courts, charging Bausili, Caputo, and other officials with fraud, breach of duty, and embezzlement. In a strongly worded message on X, she declared that the money belonging to Argentine citizens should not be hidden or managed secretly, demanding transparency from those in power. Caputo responded swiftly, denying any wrongdoing and asserting that the funds were fully traceable. He warned Pagano that he would file a defamation lawsuit against her and even hinted at donating any damages awarded to a public welfare institution. Officials within the Ministry of Economy explained that the 3.8 billion pesos in excess had been deposited into accounts held by commercial banks, including Banco Nación, to prevent a sudden influx of cash from spiking interest rates. This explanation, however, did little to calm Pagano, who continued to push for accountability. President Milei entered the fray directly, retweeting Caputo’s comments and calling Pagano a “serial liar.” He further attacked her by suggesting that her dishonesty was unsurprising given her background as a journalist. His remarks drew immediate retaliation from Pagano, who launched a blistering verbal assault on both Caputo and Milei. She called Caputo a “thief,” a “scoundrel,” a “traitor,” and a “lowlife swindler,” accusing him of stealing gold during the previous administration. Turning to Milei, she labeled him a “megalomaniac” and claimed his medications combined with “Mango Loco” no longer worked, while accusing him of destroying 300,000 small businesses. She added that power had corrupted him and exposed his true nature, warning that his delusions posed a danger to the nation. The conflict between Pagano and Milei dates back to their time in the same political movement, La Libertad Avanza. Pagano joined the legislature in 2023 as one of the party’s prominent figures in Buenos Aires province, citing pressure from official advertising in the media as a reason for her political shift. Their relationship began to deteriorate earlier this year during a scandal involving the Political Trial Committee, where Pagano was elected chair with support from then-block leader Oscar Zago. However, the move was rejected by House Speaker Martín Menem, sparking institutional turmoil. Recent tensions have intensified amid broader challenges facing Milei’s government, particularly as his wife, Karina Milei, seeks to consolidate influence over provincial politics. Meanwhile, the dispute over the missing funds continues to dominate headlines, with both sides exchanging increasingly harsh rhetoric. Pagano’s accusations have not only targeted Caputo but also raised questions about the transparency of financial management under Milei’s administration. The situation has deepened divisions within Argentina’s political landscape, with supporters of both sides rallying behind their respective leaders. While the government insists the funds were properly accounted for, Pagano and her allies remain unconvinced, pushing for independent audits and greater oversight. As legal proceedings unfold, the battle over the 4 billion pesos has become emblematic of the broader struggle for trust and accountability in public institutions.

4 reports

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7011 days ago
How much did the Government pay for each law passed in Congress, according to Marcela Pagano's complaint against Milei and Caputo

The article reports on a legal complaint filed by National Deputy Marcela Pagano against President Javier Milei and Economy Minister Luis Caputo, alleging misuse of funds generated by the Liquified Hydrocarbons Tax (ICL). According to Pagano’s claims, the government used these funds, intended exclusively for road maintenance and construction, to pressure provincial governors and secure rapid approval of legislative projects. The ICL was established under Law 23.966, creating a dedicated fund for the Integrated Road System (SisVial), which is meant to finance infrastructure work. However, Pagano argues that payments to provinces were timed to coincide with legislative voting schedules, suggesting a pattern of using financial incentives to influence votes. Previous investigations by *Perfil* and *La Nación* had already revealed that over $1.35 billion has been collected since Luis Caputo took office but not allocated for road maintenance. The article highlights concerns about the mismanagement of public resources and the potential politicization of infrastructure funding.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the allegations against Milei and Caputo as evidence of corruption and misuse of public funds, aligning with progressive critiques of neoliberal economic policies. It emphasizes the connection between financial incentives and legislative outcomes, implying a system where political

Why factuality (85): The article presents specific details about Marcela Pagano’s allegations regarding the government using funds from the ICL tax for political pressure, citing the Law 23.966 and referencing prior investigations by PERFIL and La Nación. These claims align with the cross-source consensus, though some s

Why objectivity (70): The article includes a biased statement 'Esto no les gusta a los autoritarios' which introduces an ideological tone. The overall reporting is factual but contains subjective commentary that affects neutrality.

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 6513 days ago
The war of the 4 billion: Pagano brought Caputo to Justice and unleashed the fury of Javier Milei

A political controversy has erupted in Argentina over nearly 4 trillion pesos in state funds linked to a debt auction in July. The dispute began after Santiago Bausili, head of the Central Bank, hesitated when asked where the remaining funds were. This led to a lawsuit by Congresswoman Marcela Pagano against Bausili, Finance Minister Luis Caputo, and other officials, accusing them of misappropriation and hiding the money. Caputo responded by filing a defamation claim and threatening to donate any fines to a public institution. President Javier Milei entered the fray by criticizing Pagano online, calling her a 'serial liar' and attacking her credibility as a former ally. Pagano retaliated with harsh personal insults toward both Caputo and Milei, escalating tensions further.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the conflict between political figures and officials without overtly favoring one side. It includes quotes from multiple parties involved, Pagano, Caputo, and Milei, and provides context about the financial dispute. There is no clear editorializing or biased language that would sl

Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details such as the amount (4 billion pesos), the involvement of Marcela Pagano, Luis Caputo, and Santiago Bausili, and the timeline of events including the press conference on July 29. These align with the cross-source consensus. However, some elements like 'feroz torm

Why objectivity (65): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'feroz tormenta judicial', 'dinamitó los últimos puentes', and 'intercambio de insultos brutal'. It also includes a statement suggesting that those who dislike critical journalism are 'autoritarios', which introduces bias. The tone leans toward s

Clarín logoClarínIndependentConservativeFactual 80Objective 6013 days ago
Serial liar; Chorro and mythomaniac: insults and claims between Milei and Pagano for a criminal complaint against Caputo

The article reports on heated exchanges between Argentine President Javier Milei and former Interior Minister Lucía Pigna over a criminal complaint filed against former president Mauricio Macri’s chief of staff, Santiago Caputo. Milei used derogatory terms such as 'serial liar' and 'chorro y mitómano' (slang for someone who lies and exaggerates) to describe Pigna, while Pigna accused Milei of hypocrisy and inconsistency. The conflict centers around allegations of corruption and misuse of public funds during Macri’s administration. Both leaders have been vocal in their criticisms, highlighting the polarized nature of political discourse in Argentina.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the dispute through Milei’s strong criticism of Pigna using harsh, pejorative language, which aligns with a right-leaning perspective. It emphasizes Milei’s accusations of dishonesty and hypocrisy, portraying him as the aggrieved party. The narrative leans toward validating Milei’

Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports the exchange of insults between Milei and Pagano, referencing specific terms used ('Mentirosa serial', 'Chorro y mitómano'). It aligns with the cross-source consensus on the nature of the conflict and the involvement of both parties.

Why objectivity (60): The article uses direct quotes and descriptions of insults, which can be seen as reporting facts. However, the inclusion of these phrases may imply a certain perspective on the characters involved. The tone is somewhat informal and may lean towards dramatizing the conflict, reducing neutrality.

Infobae logoInfobaeIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 7513 days ago
The conflict between Luis Caputo and the deputy Marcela Pagano over the fate of Treasury funds

The article reports on a confrontation between Luis Caputo, a prominent Argentine politician, and Marcela Pagano, a member of Congress, regarding the allocation of treasury funds. The dispute highlights disagreements over how public money should be used, reflecting broader tensions within Argentina’s political landscape. Both figures represent different factions within the ruling coalition, adding to the complexity of the issue. The incident underscores ongoing debates about fiscal responsibility and transparency in government spending. While the article does not provide detailed outcomes or resolutions, it signals growing friction among political actors over financial management.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the conflict between two political figures without overtly favoring either side. It focuses on the disagreement itself rather than taking a clear ideological stance. The framing remains neutral, emphasizing the procedural and institutional aspects of the dispute rather than ampl

Why factuality (70): The headline mentions the conflict between Caputo and Pagano regarding funds from the Treasury but lacks specific details about the amount involved or the nature of the dispute. This makes it less detailed compared to other sources, though it does not contradict them directly.

Why objectivity (75): The title is neutral but the content is not provided, so we cannot assess the full tone. Based on the available information, the article appears to report the event without overtly biased language, assuming the rest of the piece follows standard journalistic practices.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories