Prosecutor's Office calls on the Court of Auditors to apply the amnesty after the endorsement of European justice

ABC (España)IndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 703 days ago

Josep Costa, former first vice president of the Catalan Parliament, has publicly criticized Spain's Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the monarchy after being granted amnesty by the court for his involvement in Catalonia's autonomous legislative body during the 2017 independence referendum. This decision follows the European Union's Court of Justice clearing major legal objections against the amnesty law negotiated between the Spanish Socialist Party (PSOE) and Junts, which allowed Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez to be re-elected in 2023. Costa expressed disdain for these institutions in a social media post, calling the monarchy 'criminal' and stating he does not care about their rulings.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents Josep Costa’s strong criticism of the Spanish Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the monarchy, using explicitly derogatory language such as 'puta Constitución' and 'monarquía delincuente.' The framing emphasizes Costa’s defiance of judicial and constitutional authority, aligns

Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the Supreme Court's application of the amnesty law to eight individuals, citing the EU Court's approval and the legal reasoning behind the decision. It aligns closely with the primary source material regarding the scope and justification of the law.

Why objectivity (70): While factual, the article leans slightly towards supporting the legal action taken by the courts, particularly highlighting the positive outcome for those affected. There is some framing that suggests a favorable political interpretation.

El PaísIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 707 days ago

Following the European Court's approval of the amnesty law, Spain's Office of the Prosecutor has requested the Audit Court to apply the amnesty to cases related to alleged misuse of funds during Catalonia's illegal October 1, 2017 referendum and associated independence actions. The prosecutor argues that the audit court’s request for parties’ arguments is unnecessary since EU judges already ruled out the use of European funds in these cases. The Office of the Prosecutor emphasized that the issue of European funding was not raised during the preliminary question submitted to the European Court of Justice. It further noted that investigations by the Supreme Court and the Audit Court indicate the funds involved originated from Catalan authorities, not the EU. Based on procedural grounds, the prosecutor is asking for the suspension of the proceedings and the application of the amnesty once the European Court’s ruling is finalized. Meanwhile, Spain’s Constitutional Court will deliberate on September 22 on the first of seven appeals filed by leaders of the independence movement, including former minister Jordi Turull, who were denied amnesty by the Supreme Court.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal arguments from both the Office of the Prosecutor and the Audit Court regarding the application of the amnesty law. It does not exhibit clear bias toward either side but rather provides a balanced account of their positions and the legal reasoning behind them. There is

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the legal proceedings involving the prosecution requesting the application of the amnesty law after European justice's approval. It references specific legal documents and court decisions, aligning with the primary source document regarding the EU's validation of the a

Why objectivity (70): The tone leans towards supporting the prosecution’s stance against applying the amnesty law, using emotionally charged language such as 'improcedente e innecesario' and implying that the opposition is politically motivated.

elDiario.esIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 709 days ago

The European Court of Justice has validated Spain’s amnesty law, which could lead to the release of Catalan independence leaders, including Carles Puigdemont. The ruling has immediate legal effects but is expected to influence Spanish politics significantly. Junts, a pro-independence party, believes the Supreme Court may act quickly to implement the amnesty before Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez calls new elections. They argue that the European court’s decision leaves little room for the Supreme Court to avoid applying the amnesty. While some judges might still find ways to delay the process, Junts expects the amnesty to eventually take effect, especially after the Constitutional Court confirms the law’s legality this autumn. The potential release of Puigdemont could shift political dynamics, possibly impacting Sánchez’s position ahead of elections.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation through the lens of pro-independence groups like Junts, emphasizing their expectations and strategic calculations regarding the amnesty law. It highlights their belief that the European Court of Justice’s ruling compels the Supreme Court to act, potentially freeingPu

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the political implications of the EU Court's ruling, discussing the government's strategy and expectations. It references the legal background and the broader political context, staying close to the facts presented in the primary source.

Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat supportive of the government's position, using phrases like 'mantra de vestuario' which imply a strategic and calculated approach. This suggests a subtle political bias in the framing.

infoLibreIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 654 days ago

The Spanish Supreme Court has applied the amnesty law for the first time to eight individuals convicted of offenses related to the Catalan independence process ('procés') or protests against the convictions of their leaders. The court ruled that these individuals' criminal liability has been extinguished through four separate rulings published this week. This decision follows the European Court of Justice's ruling that the amnesty law aligns with EU law, as it does not affect community financial interests or contradict European anti-terrorism legislation, while promoting reconciliation. Among those granted amnesty is former President of the Catalan Parliament Roger Torrent, along with other members of the Parliament's board. Two others were involved in disturbances during protests against the 'procés' convictions in Girona in October 2019, where they were sentenced to 18 months in prison. In 2024, the Supreme Court's Criminal Chamber first brought the amnesty law before the Constitutional Court in relation to these cases.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the Supreme Court applying the amnesty law to individuals linked to the Catalan independence movement. It includes quotes from legal rulings and mentions the European Court of Justice’s approval of the law, providing balanced information without overtly slav

Why factuality (80): The article provides detailed information about the application of the amnesty law to several individuals, including specific names and charges. It references the EU Court's approval and the legal process, maintaining alignment with the primary source.

Why objectivity (65): The article has a slight political tilt, especially in its discussion of potential future applications of the law and the implications for political figures like Puigdemont. The language used implies a particular narrative about the law's impact.

elDiario.esIndependentCenter3 hr. ago

The Spanish Supreme Court has granted amnesty to four former members of Catalonia's Parliament (Mesa del Parlament) who were sentenced in 2023 by the Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia to a €1,200 fine and four months of disqualification for the crime of disobedience. The amnesty was sought after they appealed the ruling, which had been suspended pending a constitutional review. Following approval from the Constitutional Court and the European Union’s Court of Justice, the Supreme Court applied the amnesty, effectively overturning the earlier conviction.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal process and outcome without overt ideological slant, focusing on the procedural aspects of the amnesty decision. It does not take a clear stance on the legitimacy of the convictions or the broader political implications, maintaining a balanced narrative based on court-