ON
← Back to feed
The prosecutor's office asks to investigate Vito Quiles for alleged fraud when collecting donations that would go to his personal account
Spain🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 hr. ago

The prosecutor's office asks to investigate Vito Quiles for alleged fraud when collecting donations that would go to his personal account

The Public Prosecutor's Office in Seville has filed a complaint against Vito Quiles, an ultraleft activist, for alleged fraud related to donations collected for children affected by the Dana flood in Valencia and scholarships for young people. The case stems from a report submitted by the consumer rights organization Facua-Consumidores en Acción, which claims Quiles redirected funds to his personal bank account rather than using them for their stated purposes. According to Facua, since January 2025, Quiles has been collecting money through his Telegram channel, claiming it would go toward distributing toys and gifts to flood victims, but the funds were being deposited into the same account he used to finance his own activities since 2022. Facua further alleges that Quiles' new platform, Combativos, has been soliciting donations under the pretense that they would support both content production and youth scholarships, though the allocation of funds remains unclear. The prosecutor’s office argues that because all donations end up in Quiles’ personal account, donors cannot ensure their contributions reach the intended recipients.

2 reports

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentCenter5 hr. ago
The prosecutor's office asks to investigate Vito Quiles for alleged fraud when collecting donations that would go to his personal account

The Public Prosecutor's Office in Seville has filed a complaint against Vito Quiles, an ultraleft activist, for alleged fraud related to donations collected for children affected by the Dana flood in Valencia and scholarships for young people. The case stems from a report submitted by the consumer rights organization Facua-Consumidores en Acción, which claims Quiles redirected funds to his personal bank account rather than using them for their stated purposes. According to Facua, since January 2025, Quiles has been collecting money through his Telegram channel, claiming it would go toward distributing toys and gifts to flood victims, but the funds were being deposited into the same account he used to finance his own activities since 2022. Facua further alleges that Quiles' new platform, Combativos, has been soliciting donations under the pretense that they would support both content production and youth scholarships, though the allocation of funds remains unclear. The prosecutor’s office argues that because all donations end up in Quiles’ personal account, donors cannot ensure their contributions reach the intended recipients.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the allegations made by Facua-Consumidores en Acción and the subsequent actions taken by the Public Prosecutor's Office in a balanced manner, without overtly favoring either side. It reports the accusations of fraud and the legal steps initiated without taking a stance on the合法性

El Mundo logoEl MundoIndependent🔒Center5 hr. ago
The prosecutor's office of Seville asks to investigate Vito Quiles for alleged fraud in the collection of funds after the DANA of Valencia

The Public Prosecutor's Office in Seville has filed a complaint against Vito Quiles, a controversial communicator, alleging fraud related to fundraising activities. The allegations stem from a report by Facua-Consumers in Action, which claims that donations intended for children affected by the DANA (a severe weather event) in Valencia and scholarships for young people were allegedly funneled into Quiles' personal bank account. According to Facua, Quiles has repeatedly asked for donations through his Telegram channel over the past four years, directing all funds to his account without specifying their purpose. Additionally, Quiles’ new platform, Combativos, reportedly collects donations under the guise of funding content production and youth scholarships, but without clarifying how much goes to each cause. The prosecutor’s office argues that this practice undermines donors’ intentions and makes it difficult to determine how much money was misappropriated.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal action taken by the Public Prosecutor's Office based on a formal complaint from Facua-Consumers in Action. It provides details from both the prosecution and the complainant without overtly favoring either side. The language remains factual and does not exhibit clear sl

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories