ON
← Back to feed
The Spain of the 'junas', the crypto-currency perroflauta: barter, goodrollism and dangerous pseudomedicine
Spain📈 Economy10 days ago

The Spain of the 'junas', the crypto-currency perroflauta: barter, goodrollism and dangerous pseudomedicine

In March 2000, during the dot-com bubble burst, Frenchman Stéphane Laborde became interested in money after witnessing the collapse of technology companies. This led him to develop a monetary system where members of a network would receive daily units of currency, which could be spent, saved, or earned through trade. To prevent abuse, new users had to be verified by existing members. In 2010, Laborde formalized his idea into the Theory of Relative Money, aiming to create a community-based, solidarity-driven currency. The system was launched in 2017 by 59 French participants using a blockchain platform called Cesium. Initially, the currency had little value since there were no goods or services to exchange, but this changed as members began trading items like vegetables, repairs, and lessons. Over time, the currency evolved into a functional medium of exchange within the community, spreading beyond France through word-of-mouth.

In March 2017, 59 French individuals activated a decentralized monetary system known as “juna,” which originated from the work of Stéphane Laborde, a former video producer who had previously observed the rise and fall of tech companies during the dot-com bubble. Inspired by his experiences, Laborde conceptualized a currency that would operate independently of traditional financial institutions, aiming to create a more equitable and community-driven economic model. The system was built upon blockchain technology, allowing participants to maintain digital wallets through an application called Cesium. On its launch day, each participant received 10 units of the currency, totaling 590 units distributed among the initial members. The concept behind juna was rooted in the idea that money should be accessible to all, with daily allocations designed to ensure participation without requiring immediate labor or trade. However, this system faced challenges early on, as there were few users willing to accept juna as payment. To overcome this, the community began creating tangible value by offering goods and services such as produce, repairs, accommodation, and language lessons. This led to the emergence of localized markets, where individuals could exchange physical items for juna, gradually transforming the currency into a functional medium of exchange within the network. The movement gained traction beyond France, particularly in Spain, where it was adopted under the name “juna” due to phonetic adaptation. Spanish participants organized face-to-face markets and utilized platforms like Gchange and Girala to facilitate transactions. These platforms allowed sellers to set their own prices and determine how many juna they wished to receive for their offerings. The informal nature of these exchanges fostered a sense of community and mutual support, reinforcing the principles of solidarity and self-sufficiency that underpinned the project. By April 2024, the global network of certified members had dwindled slightly, with over 7,000 active participants concentrated primarily in France and Spain. The decline was attributed to the requirement for members to renew their status periodically, leading to the gradual removal of inactive accounts from the system. In Spain specifically, a public count conducted in April 2024 recorded 466 certified members, while an additional 2,170 simple wallet accounts existed, indicating continued engagement despite the reduction in active participants. The evolution of juna reflects broader trends in alternative economies and grassroots initiatives aimed at challenging conventional financial systems. While the project has not achieved widespread adoption, it has demonstrated the potential for peer-to-peer economic models to thrive in niche communities. The ongoing presence of juna in both France and Spain highlights the enduring appeal of decentralized currencies and the resilience of collaborative economic practices. As the network continues to evolve, it remains a unique example of how innovation can emerge from personal experience and collective effort.

1 reports

El Mundo logoEl MundoIndependent🔒CenterFactual 65Objective 7010 days ago
The Spain of the 'junas', the crypto-currency perroflauta: barter, goodrollism and dangerous pseudomedicine

In March 2000, during the dot-com bubble burst, Frenchman Stéphane Laborde became interested in money after witnessing the collapse of technology companies. This led him to develop a monetary system where members of a network would receive daily units of currency, which could be spent, saved, or earned through trade. To prevent abuse, new users had to be verified by existing members. In 2010, Laborde formalized his idea into the Theory of Relative Money, aiming to create a community-based, solidarity-driven currency. The system was launched in 2017 by 59 French participants using a blockchain platform called Cesium. Initially, the currency had little value since there were no goods or services to exchange, but this changed as members began trading items like vegetables, repairs, and lessons. Over time, the currency evolved into a functional medium of exchange within the community, spreading beyond France through word-of-mouth.

Bias read (Center): The article discusses the development and implementation of a decentralized cryptocurrency system, focusing on its technical and social aspects rather than any political controversy, ideology, or policy debate. There is no evident framing that favors one side over another, and the content remains ap

Why factuality (65): The article provides a detailed narrative of the creation of the 'juna' cryptocurrency by Stéphane Laborde, including specific dates like March 2000 and March 8, 2017, and mentions the name of the application used, Cesium. However, it lacks direct sourcing or verification from independent sources, m

Why objectivity (70): The article uses descriptive language such as 'buenrollismo' and 'peligrosa pseudomedicina,' which may imply a critical stance toward the project. While not overtly biased, the tone leans slightly toward skepticism or caution, suggesting some level of subjectivity in the portrayal of the event.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories