ON
← Back to feed
Consumer confidence fell by 4.8% in July, deepening the deterioration in the perception of the economic situation
AR📈 EconomyCenter16 hr. ago

Consumer confidence fell by 4.8% in July, deepening the deterioration in the perception of the economic situation

The Consumer Confidence Index (ICC), compiled by the Center for Financial Research (CIF) at the Torcuato Di Tella University, fell by 4.8% in July compared to June, ending two consecutive months of recovery. The index dropped to 40.67 points, marking a year-on-year decline of 12.3%, the sharpest since July 2020 during the height of the pandemic. Despite slower inflation and greater macroeconomic stability, households across Argentina reported worsening economic sentiment. The decline was widespread, with the City of Buenos Aires and Greater Buenos Aires experiencing the largest drops, while the interior regions maintained higher confidence but still showed a decline. Lower-income households saw their confidence fall by 11.47%, significantly more than the 1.45% drop among higher-income households. The 'Current Conditions' component, which measures perceptions of personal and overall economic situations, declined by 1.24% month-on-month and 13.6% year-on-year. Meanwhile, 'Future Expectations' also fell by 7.2% compared to June and 11.4% compared to July 2025, though it remained the strongest part of the index at 47.1 points, indicating some optimism about medium-term economic growth.

The U.S. consumer confidence index dropped in July, signaling growing concerns over economic conditions and labor market trends. According to data released Tuesday, the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index fell by 1.4 points to 90.8, marking its lowest level since 2021. This decline followed a revised upward adjustment to June's figures, which had initially been higher. Economists had forecasted a reading of 92.4, indicating a broader than expected downward shift in sentiment. The drop reflects worsening perceptions of current business conditions and the labor market, with consumers expressing greater uncertainty about their financial prospects. Consumer confidence was further impacted by rising fuel and food prices, which have persisted despite recent fluctuations in oil prices. Between mid-July and early August, gasoline prices dipped to their lowest level since March before rebounding following renewed tensions between the United States and Iran. These geopolitical developments contributed to increased inflationary pressures, reinforcing existing fears among households about the affordability of essential goods. While gasoline prices remained a concern, attention shifted toward food costs, which continued to weigh heavily on household budgets. The labor market showed signs of slowing momentum, according to the survey. A key indicator, the gap between the percentage of respondents who believe jobs are plentiful and those who find them scarce, narrowed to its lowest level since 2021. Only 24.6% of respondents thought employment opportunities were abundant, while the proportion viewing job searching as difficult slightly decreased. However, this narrowing suggests a more challenging environment for job seekers, with fewer positions available relative to demand. The labor market’s deceleration follows months of robust performance earlier in the year, raising questions about the sustainability of recent gains. Despite these challenges, consumers continue to spend, driven by ongoing optimism about future economic conditions. Retail sales rose for a fifth consecutive month in June, and economists anticipate that consumption will remain a key driver of growth during the second quarter. The Conference Board noted that although current conditions have dampened confidence, consumers have not significantly altered their spending plans. Instead, they remain focused on high-value purchases and services such as dining out, with travel intentions also increasing. Expectations of inflation for the coming year declined, though most respondents still anticipate interest rates will rise over the next twelve months. Looking ahead, the Department of Commerce is set to release the second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) data along with related metrics including spending, income, and inflation figures for June. These reports will provide further insight into the economy’s trajectory and whether the slowdown in consumer confidence signals a broader trend or a temporary setback. Meanwhile, other indicators suggest mixed results. For instance, Argentina’s Córdoba province recorded a 16.4% annual increase in exports through May 2026, reaching USD 4.91 billion. However, the agricultural machinery sector faced headwinds, with production declining despite a modest uptick in output. The industry continues to struggle with lower revenues and reduced export volumes, highlighting the uneven nature of economic recovery across different sectors. Inflation remains a persistent challenge, with monthly rates hovering around 2%, though achieving sustained low inflation will take longer than anticipated. Fiscal policy has maintained a primary surplus, but declining tax revenue due to weaker economic activity complicates efforts to stimulate growth. The government has shown strength in managing debt obligations, having outlined repayment schedules for the remainder of 2026 and into 2027. Nonetheless, the lack of clarity regarding peso-denominated debt commitments has raised concerns about long-term financial stability. The economy has managed to reduce risk of crisis, as reflected by improved ratings from credit agencies, yet the path to investment-grade status by 2031 remains uncertain. With risks remaining elevated, the outlook for economic expansion remains cautiously optimistic.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

8 reports

La Nación logoLa NaciónIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 909 days ago
Consumer confidence fell by almost 5% in July after two months on the rise

The Consumer Confidence Index (ICC) in Argentina fell by 4.8% in July 2026, marking a reversal from previous months of growth. The decline affected all regions of the country, including both low-income and high-income households, as well as all age groups. The index dropped to 40.67 points, down from 42.71 points in June 2026, representing a 12.30% annual decrease compared to July 2025. The report highlights that confidence peaked under the current administration in January 2025 at 47.38 points but has since declined by 14.16%. Since the economic measures introduced by President Milei in early 2024, which brought the index down to 35.60 points, there has been a 14.24% increase. The most significant drops were recorded in Greater Buenos Aires (-6.35%) and Buenos Aires City (-6.24%), while the interior saw a smaller decline of -1.68%. The data also indicates that younger age groups experienced sharper declines in confidence.

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses economic indicators influenced by government policies, it presents the data objectively without overtly favoring any political stance. It reports on the impact of various administrations and policies without taking a clear ideological position, maintaining a balanced tone

Why factuality (95): The article provides specific data points such as the 4.8% decline in consumer confidence in July, the index value of 40.67, and regional breakdowns including the 6.35% drop in the Greater Buenos Aires area. These figures align closely with the cross-source consensus from other articles, which also

Why objectivity (90): The article presents the information in a largely neutral manner, focusing on statistical data and contextualizing the decline within broader economic trends. It avoids overtly biased language or commentary, though it does note the impact on both high- and low-income households, which could subtly f

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentCenterFactual 93Objective 859 days ago
Consumer confidence fell by 4.8% in July, deepening the deterioration in the perception of the economic situation

The Consumer Confidence Index (ICC), compiled by the Center for Financial Research (CIF) at the Torcuato Di Tella University, fell by 4.8% in July compared to June, ending two consecutive months of recovery. The index dropped to 40.67 points, marking a year-on-year decline of 12.3%, the sharpest since July 2020 during the height of the pandemic. Despite slower inflation and greater macroeconomic stability, households across Argentina reported worsening economic sentiment. The decline was widespread, with the City of Buenos Aires and Greater Buenos Aires experiencing the largest drops, while the interior regions maintained higher confidence but still showed a decline. Lower-income households saw their confidence fall by 11.47%, significantly more than the 1.45% drop among higher-income households. The 'Current Conditions' component, which measures perceptions of personal and overall economic situations, declined by 1.24% month-on-month and 13.6% year-on-year. Meanwhile, 'Future Expectations' also fell by 7.2% compared to June and 11.4% compared to July 2025, though it remained the strongest part of the index at 47.1 points, indicating some optimism about medium-term economic growth.

Bias read (Center): The article presents statistical data on consumer confidence without overtly favoring any political stance. It reports on economic indicators and regional differences in confidence levels without using biased language or selectively emphasizing certain viewpoints.

Why factuality (93): This article accurately reports the 4.8% monthly decline in the ICC, the 12.3% annual decrease, and the regional breakdowns. It also mentions the 11.47% drop among lower-income households and the 1.45% drop among higher-income households. However, it adds a comparison to the 2020 pandemic crisis, wh

Why objectivity (85): While the article remains mostly factual, it introduces a subjective framing by comparing the current situation to the 2020 pandemic crisis, which could imply a stronger negative judgment than necessary. Additionally, it quotes Sebastián Auguste, the director of CIF, which might introduce a slight b

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 759 days ago
Consumer confidence fell by almost 5% in July and hit lower income households hardest

The Consumer Confidence Index (ICC) in Argentina fell by nearly 5% in July, marking a continued decline in household expectations. The index dropped to 40.67 points, representing a monthly decrease of 4.78% and a year-on-year drop of 12.30% compared to July 2025. The contraction was widespread across all regions and income segments, but households with lower incomes were disproportionately affected, experiencing a sharper decline of 11.47% in confidence. In Greater Buenos Aires (GBA), confidence fell by 6.35% to 38.12 points, while the interior maintained higher levels at 45.55 points. Lower-income households saw significant drops in their perception of personal and macroeconomic conditions, with the gap between high and low-income households widening. The report highlights broader economic concerns, including reduced willingness to purchase durable goods and real estate.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the decline in consumer confidence as part of a broader pattern influenced by government policies, particularly referencing 'fraude estadístico' (statistical fraud) associated with President Milei. This implies criticism of the administration’s handling of economic data and its sp

Why factuality (90): The article correctly states the 4.78% monthly decline and 12.30% annual decrease in the ICC, along with the regional breakdowns and the significant difference between income levels. However, it includes a controversial claim about 'fraudulent statistics' attributed to Milei, which is not supported

Why objectivity (75): The article has a clear ideological tilt, particularly in its mention of 'fraudulent statistics' related to Milei, which is highly charged and lacks supporting evidence. While it still provides factual data, the inclusion of this subjective critique significantly reduces its neutrality. The focus on

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 804 days ago
Cordoba exported USD 4.910 billion and grew again, but the agricultural machinery industry lagged behind

The province of Córdoba exported USD 4.910 million between January and May 2026, representing a 16.4% annual growth and accounting for 12.2% of Argentina’s total exports, according to data from the INDEC compiled by ProCórdoba. The majority of these exports were agro-industrial products, including primary goods and agricultural manufacturing, which together accounted for 86.4% of the total. Corn remained the leading export product, while industrial manufacturing exports grew by 6.8%. Brazil was the top buyer, followed by India and China, which saw significant growth in purchases. Despite increased production in agricultural machinery, the sector faced declining revenues both domestically and internationally. José María Manuali has been appointed as the new president of the Córdoba Industrial Union.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual economic data and does not exhibit clear ideological framing or biased language. It reports on export figures, industry performance, and leadership changes without overtly favoring any political stance.

Why factuality (85): The article cites the Informe de Comercio Exterior from Agencia ProCórdoba based on INDEC data, which is a recognized official source. It provides specific figures and percentages, aligning with typical reporting standards for economic data. The structure and growth statistics are consistent with cr

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the data in a neutral manner, focusing on statistical outcomes without overt bias. It mentions multiple countries as destinations without favoring any particular region. However, there is some subtle emphasis on certain products like maize and vehicles, which may reflect regiona

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 704 days ago
US consumer confidence fell in July and the labour market lit up warning signs

Consumer confidence in the United States fell in July due to worsening perceptions of current business conditions and the labor market. According to The Conference Board, the consumer confidence index dropped 1.4 points to 90.8, reaching its lowest level since 2021. This decline was influenced by rising gasoline and food prices, which increased concerns over inflation and the cost of living. While the labor market showed signs of slowing down after a strong spring performance, the proportion of consumers who believe jobs are abundant decreased to 24.6%. Meanwhile, the difference between those who find jobs easy to get and those who find them difficult reached its lowest point since 2021, indicating a more challenging job market for job seekers. Despite these challenges, U.S. consumers continue to spend, with retail sales increasing for the fifth consecutive month in June.

Bias read (Center): The article presents economic data objectively, focusing on statistical changes in consumer confidence and labor market indicators without overtly favoring any political perspective. It includes quotes from Trump but does not frame them as endorsements or criticisms. The tone remains neutral, summar

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the decline in U.S. consumer confidence in July based on data from The Conference Board, aligning with the cross-source consensus. It provides specific figures and mentions economic indicators like employment market signals, which are standard in such reporting. However, it in

Why objectivity (70): The tone is generally neutral regarding the economic data but shifts when discussing political figures like Trump, introducing a more subjective element. The inclusion of unrelated commentary on politics affects the overall objectivity.

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 708 days ago
Mass consumption accumulates seven months of decline and registers a year-on-year fall of 5%

Argentina's economy is showing signs of prolonged decline, with mass consumption falling for seven consecutive months and recording a year-on-year drop of 5%. This trend is part of a broader economic contraction, including a 0.5% decrease in economic activity in May and a 0.7% decline in industrial production during the first half of the year. High inflation and stagnant wages have led families to reduce spending and prioritize essential purchases. The Index of Consumer Confidence has also fallen significantly, reaching its lowest level since July 2020, indicating widespread pessimism about the future. These indicators collectively suggest a deepening economic crisis that challenges the government's narrative.

Bias read (Center): The article presents economic data and analysis without overtly favoring any political side. It highlights declining economic indicators such as consumption, industrial production, and consumer confidence, which are presented objectively. While critical of the government's portrayal of the situation

Why factuality (85): The article references the seven-month consecutive decline in mass consumption and a 2.9% drop in June, which aligns with the broader narrative of declining consumer confidence. However, it lacks specific numerical details about the ICC itself, relying instead on broader economic indicators like the

Why objectivity (70): The article takes a strongly critical tone toward the government and uses emotionally charged language such as 'this doesn't please the authoritarians' and 'the exercise of professional journalism is a pillar of democracy.' This framing suggests a political bias and diminishes the perceived neutrali

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 658 days ago
Daniel Artana: It can improve the economy in 2027, but it is difficult for society to notice it ahead of the elections

Economist Daniel Artana discusses Argentina's economic outlook during a segment on 'Modo Fontevecchia' broadcast by Net TV and Radio Perfil. He estimates a modest annual growth rate of between 3% and 3.5%, but warns that much of this improvement will be concentrated in specific sectors while many activities remain stagnant. Artana notes that while financial indicators have improved—including increased central bank reserves, strong exports, and reduced risk premiums—the short-term economic activity data remains weak, particularly in Greater Buenos Aires. He highlights a growing gap between urban areas and rural regions, with confidence levels diverging significantly. Although he acknowledges potential economic improvements by 2027, he suggests these gains may not translate into noticeable societal benefits before the next election.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced assessment of Argentina’s economic situation, citing both positive financial indicators and ongoing challenges in economic activity. While it mentions political figures like Milei and references election timing, it does not take a clear partisan stance. The framing is

Why factuality (85): The article presents economist Daniel Artana's analysis of Argentina's economic prospects for 2027, citing his credentials and professional background. It reports his estimate of GDP growth between 3% and 3.5%, noting that improvements may not be widely perceived by society. The content aligns with

Why objectivity (65): The article includes a quote from Daniel Artana that suggests a critical view of Argentina's economic situation, but it also contains a partial sentence that appears to be part of a larger argument against authoritarianism. This creates a somewhat biased tone, suggesting a political stance rather th

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentCenter16 hr. ago
Waiting for Growth

The Argentine economy experienced significant growth during the second half of 2024 and early 2025, driven by recovery in credit and expansion of sectors like energy, mining, and agriculture. However, this growth has since stalled, with the Consumer Confidence Index also declining. High interest rates, fueled by currency fluctuations ahead of legislative elections, caused 7 million people to fall into arrears. Credit restrictions have impacted GDP since last year, compounded by real income contraction due to inflation outpacing wage increases. While exports are growing at 14%, the overall economic activity remains weak, with private employment declining sharply and lower real wages affecting household budgets. The government maintains financial stability but struggles to stimulate broader economic recovery.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of Argentina's economic situation, discussing both positive developments (growth in certain sectors, export performance) and negative trends (stagnation, rising debt, employment issues). It does not overtly favor any political ideology or party, though it all

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories