The Spanish opposition party, the People's Party (PP), has formally requested Judge Santiago Pedraz to revoke the authority of Mercedes González, the head of Spain’s National Police Corps (Guardia Civil), and her deputy, Lieutenant General Manuel Llamas, over the Unit Central Operative (UCO). The request comes as part of legal proceedings surrounding the case of Leire Díez, an ex-member of the ruling Socialist Party (PSOE) who is accused of orchestrating a scheme aimed at obstructing investigations into corruption within the government and the PSOE. Both González and Llamas have been indicted by the judge for allegedly using internal disciplinary mechanisms of the Guardia Civil to pressure the UCO and hinder its investigative work. The PP, led by regional leader Alberto Núñez Feijóo, submitted a formal petition to the court, urging Judge Pedraz to take protective measures against both officials. The party argues that their continued leadership over the UCO poses a risk to the integrity of ongoing investigations. According to the petition, González and Llamas maintain full command over the unit and its personnel, including the Department of Economic Crime and Corruption (DIECAN), which is leading the probe into alleged wrongdoing by the government and Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s inner circle. The PP contends that this situation creates a potential for retaliation against witnesses and agents involved in the investigation. In the petition, the PP highlights that the law already restricts access by senior police officers to judicial investigations, requiring agents to report only to the judge overseeing the case. However, they argue that the current arrangement allows González and Llamas to exert undue influence through internal disciplinary procedures, thereby undermining the impartiality of the UCO’s work. The party further claims that these two officials continue to hold their positions despite being under investigation, with no administrative action taken to remove them or force their resignation. The PP also seeks to include former Guardia Civil chief Leonardo Marcos as a suspect in the case, citing allegations that he instructed the UCO to “stay low” during an investigation involving David Sánchez, brother of President Sánchez and recently convicted of abuse of power. The party believes that such directives represent an overreach beyond routine supervision and may indicate coordination with Leire Díez’s alleged network. This claim was echoed by Alma Ezcurra, the PP’s vice-secretary for sector coordination, who stated that the ongoing cases must be investigated freely, and it makes no sense for the two officials to retain control over the UCO. According to reports from the UCO, the alleged conspiracy led by Leire Díez sought to manipulate internal disciplinary processes as a means of pressuring investigators. The UCO alleges that Díez used her prior relationship with González to facilitate this strategy, aiming to create an environment of intimidation among those conducting the investigations. The PP emphasizes that the UCO’s role is critical in supporting the justice system, particularly in high-profile criminal cases, and that the continued authority of González and Llamas compromises this function. The PP has called upon Judge Pedraz to ensure that the UCO operates independently, free from interference by those under investigation. They have asked for specific measures, including prohibiting González and Llamas from issuing orders, initiating or resolving disciplinary actions, accessing relevant documents, or communicating directly with agents or witnesses involved in the case. The party has left the decision to the judge on whether additional safeguards should be implemented to protect the investigation’s integrity and the safety of those involved. This legal challenge reflects broader tensions between the governing coalition and the opposition, with the PP accusing the government of failing to act decisively against officials implicated in corruption-related investigations. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how high-ranking public officials are handled during active legal inquiries, potentially reshaping the balance of power within Spain’s security forces.
10 reports
elDiario.esIndependentConservativeFactual 86Objective 804 days agoThe Spanish People's Party (PP) has requested that the judge handling the 'Leire Díez case' prohibit the head of the Guardia Civil, Mercedes González, and her deputy operational director, Manuel Llamas, from exercising any authority over the National Anti-Corruption Unit (UCO) during the ongoing investigation. The PP argues that these officials, who are implicated in the case, continue to hold full authority over the UCO, which is under scrutiny for allegedly obstructing investigations. They seek protective measures including restrictions on disciplinary actions, access to documents, and communication with involved agents and witnesses. The PP warns of potential retaliation against witnesses and agents, emphasizing that the UCO’s work supporting judicial processes must remain protected.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the PP's demands as necessary legal protections for investigators, using strong language like 'prohibir' (prohibit) and 'represalia' (retaliation). It emphasizes the PP's role as the unified prosecution and highlights their concerns about the current leadership's influence over an
Why factuality (86): This article closely mirrors the first in content and structure, providing the same core facts about the PP's legal requests to the judge. It maintains consistency with the other sources and does not introduce new or conflicting information. The language is clear and factual, supporting high factual
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the information objectively, without evident bias. It reports the PP's actions and arguments without expressing personal opinion or emotional language. The focus remains on the legal process and the PP's stated concerns.
elDiario.esIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8012 days ago The DAO of the Civil Guard rejects before the judge of the Leire Díez case that the investigations for leaks were a pressure on the UCOThe Director Adjunto Operativo (DAO) of Spain's Guardia Civil, Lieutenant General Manuel Llamas, testified before Judge Santiago Pedraz in the case involving Leire Díez, denying that investigations into leaks were intended to pressure the Unit of Criminal Investigation (UCO). Llamas stated that three confidential reports opened to clarify the origin of journalistic information about UCO investigations were part of standard procedures and not meant to exert pressure. The testimony contradicts claims by the UCO, supported by Anti-Corruption and the judge, which allege that these reports were opened due to alleged influence by the former Socialist Party member Leire Díez over Mercedes González, head of the Guardia Civil. Llamas also mentioned that since becoming the second-in-command of the Corps, he has been involved in 56 such confidential reports, mostly serious cases, while noting that hundreds have occurred across the entire Guardia Civil. He denied applying pressure on the unit during investigations related to the PSOE or the environment of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez. Additionally, for the first time in this controversy, the name of Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska,愤
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of conflicting allegations regarding the Guardia Civil's handling of confidential investigations. It includes perspectives from both the UCO and the DAO, with Llamas defending his actions and the UCO presenting their accusations. The tone remains objective, as
Why factuality (85): The article reports on Llamas' testimony before Judge Pedraz regarding the three confidential investigations into possible leaks related to the UCO. It provides details from legal sources and aligns with the broader narrative of the case. While not citing a primary source directly, it reflects the c
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting both sides of the investigation and quoting officials without overt bias. However, there is some emphasis on the implications of the UCO’s actions, which may slightly lean towards a critical perspective.
El MundoIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 85Objective 784 days agoThe Spanish Popular Party (PP) has requested that the judge handling the 'Leire Díez case' prohibit the head of the Guardia Civil, Mercedes González, and her deputy operational director, Manuel Llamas, from exercising any authority over the National Anti-Corruption Unit (UCO) during the ongoing investigation. The PP argues that both officials, who are implicated in the case, continue to hold their positions and exert hierarchical control over the UCO, which is under scrutiny for allegedly obstructing justice. They seek measures such as preventing these officials from initiating or managing confidential investigations, accessing related documentation, or communicating directly with involved agents and witnesses. The PP emphasizes that this situation undermines the integrity of judicial proceedings and the proper functioning of the UCO, which supports the judiciary in high-sensitivity cases. They highlight that neither González nor Llamas has been removed from office despite being investigated.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the PP's request as a legitimate legal action to protect the integrity of the judicial process and the UCO's role in supporting the judiciary. While the issue involves allegations against senior Guardia Civil officials, the PP's stance is presented as a proactive effort to ensure
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the PP's request to the judge in the 'Leire case' regarding restrictions on the Guardia Civil leadership's authority over the UCO. It provides specific details from an official statement and aligns with the cross-source consensus among the other articles. The informati
Why objectivity (78): The tone remains neutral, focusing on reporting the PP's demands without overtly taking sides. However, there is subtle political framing by mentioning the PP's role in leading the unified prosecution and their concerns about potential retaliation, which slightly skews the narrative toward their per
elDiario.esIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7012 days ago European Commission draws attention to Spain over corruption casesThe European Commission has issued a formal warning to Spain regarding its handling of corruption cases and the independence of the judiciary. In its annual report on the Rule of Law, which will be presented this Friday, the Commission criticizes the Spanish government under Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez for limited progress in combating corruption. The report highlights the ineffective implementation of the Public Integrity Law and the National Anti-Corruption Plan, urging the government to take stronger measures to reduce corruption. It calls for the creation of an independent supervisory body with effective investigative and sanctioning powers. Recently, the Supreme Court sentenced former Transport Minister and PSOE Secretary José Luis Ábalos to 24 years and three months in prison for his involvement in the 'Mascarillas' corruption case, along with other convictions. The report also emphasizes the need to strengthen rules on conflicts of interest and asset declarations by high-ranking officials. This comes amid legal proceedings involving Sánchez’s brother, who was recently sentenced to nine years of disqualification for abuse of power, and ongoing investigations into the wife of
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents criticism from the European Commission toward the Spanish government over corruption and judicial independence, highlighting concerns raised by the EU institution. While the content includes information on legal actions against high-profile figures, including the prime minister,
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the European Commission's criticism of Spain's anti-corruption efforts, citing specific legal cases like the 'caso Mascarillas' and mentions the EU report being presented. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that the Commission is calling out Spain for limited pr
Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat critical of the Spanish government, using phrases like 'llama la atención' and referencing political figures in a way that suggests bias. The article frames the situation as a political issue rather than purely factual.
El PaísIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 83Objective 754 days agoThe Spanish conservative Party Popular (PP), led by Alberto Núñez Feijóo, has submitted a legal request to Judge Santiago Pedraz asking him to remove Mercedes González, Director General of the Guardia Civil, and her deputy Manuel Llamas from their command roles over the Unit Central Operative (UCO). The PP argues that both officials, who are under investigation for allegedly using disciplinary measures within the Guardia Civil to hinder investigations into the Socialist Party (PSOE) and the government, maintain undue influence over agents conducting these investigations. They claim this undermines the integrity of the ongoing probe, particularly into corruption linked to Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s circle. The PP criticizes the government for its 'passivity' in addressing the issue and urges the court to restrict the two officials’ authority over the UCO, especially regarding internal investigations and access to related documentation. The PP also suggests including former Guardia Civil chief Leonardo Marcos as an accused party due to allegations he instructed the UCO to remain passive during an investigation involving David Sánchez, brother of the president.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the PP's actions as a legitimate legal challenge against officials under investigation, emphasizing their alleged misuse of power to obstruct justice. While the subject involves potential misconduct by high-ranking officials, the framing leans toward validating the PP's stance, as
Why factuality (83): The article provides accurate information about the PP's request to the judge, including the names of those involved and the nature of the legal measures sought. It references the ongoing investigation and the PP's position within the judicial process. While slightly more detailed in context, it rem
Why objectivity (75): There is a slight lean towards the PP's perspective, particularly in the phrasing such as 'no quiere que se aplaque el ruido' which implies a political motive. This introduces a minor subjective element, affecting objectivity.
El MundoIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 8513 days ago García Ortiz's right hand admits that he told the meeting with the PSOE's 'fountain' to the former attorney general but says he did not give it importanceDiego Villafañe, a close associate of former Chief Prosecutor Álvaro García Ortiz, testified before Spain’s National Court that he met with Leire Díez, known as the 'plumber' of the Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE), but claimed he was unaware of her background and considered the meetings unimportant. The meetings took place at the headquarters of the Technical Secretariat in March and April 2025, during which Jacobo Teijelo, now under investigation, and Leire Díez were present. According to the State Prosecution Office, Díez was introduced as a colleague of Teijelo. Villafañe stated that no formal records were made of these meetings, and they were not logged in the visitor book at Fortuny. These encounters are part of an alleged corruption scheme led by former PSOE Organization Secretary Santos Cerdán, aimed at undermining anti-corruption prosecutors. The meetings occurred after El Confidencial had exposed Díez’s activities, giving them public relevance.
Bias read (Center): The article presents testimony from both Villafañe and other involved parties without overtly favoring any side. It includes details from multiple perspectives and does not use emotionally charged language or selectively omit information to push a particular narrative. The framing remains neutral,陈述
Why factuality (80): The article discusses Diego Villafañé’s testimony regarding his meetings with Leire Díez. While it includes quotes from Villafañé and the Fiscalía, there is less detail on the broader context of the case. The information is consistent with other reports but lacks depth on the full scope of the alleg
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains an objective tone, reporting on Villafañé’s testimony and the Fiscalía’s position without expressing personal opinion. It avoids sensationalism and sticks to the reported facts.
20minutosIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 8011 days agoMercedes González, director of the Spanish National Police (Guardia Civil), has distanced herself from the 'Leire' investigation and described herself as a victim of former Interior Minister Juan José Cerdán. The 'Leire' case involves allegations of corruption and abuse of power within Spain’s security forces. González's comments suggest she believes she was unfairly targeted by Cerdán during her tenure. This development comes amid ongoing scrutiny of high-ranking officials in Spain's law enforcement and justice sectors.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual statement regarding González's position without overtly favoring any side. It does not include loaded language or one-sided sourcing, maintaining neutrality in its presentation of the claim.
Why factuality (75): The article discusses the historical background of the UCO's funding issues under Sánchez and links it to the broader case involving Cerdán and Leire Díez. It references past events and political figures, consistent with other reports.
Why objectivity (80): The tone is informative rather than biased, providing context without taking a clear editorial stance. It avoids emotional language and sticks to factual reporting.
ABC (España)IndependentProgressiveFactual 70Objective 859 days agoIn August 2018, shortly after Pedro Sánchez became Spain’s prime minister, Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska issued an order to cut funding for the Guardia Civil’s elite Unit for Judicial Investigations (UCO). This move targeted the unit led by Colonel Manuel Sánchez Corbí, who had sent internal emails criticizing the decision. These emails revealed that the Koldo corruption network was already active in Navarre since 2016 through the Muga mine project linked to companies owned by Santos Cerdán and Antxón Alonso. The scandal later expanded to involve the national PSOE leadership, particularly after Sánchez won the party’s primaries in 2017, and eventually reached the Spanish government following Sánchez’s victory in the motion of censure against the Popular Party (PP) government.
Bias read (Progressive): The article focuses on actions taken by the PSOE government under Pedro Sánchez, including cutting funding for the Guardia Civil’s investigative unit and exposing a corruption network tied to the PSOE. The narrative emphasizes the role of the PSOE in both initiating the investigation and being entwv
Why factuality (70): The article reports on Llamas’ accusation against certain UCO members for excessive self-promotion. It includes quotes from his Senate testimony and aligns with other accounts of his statements. No primary source is directly cited, but the content matches cross-source reporting.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on Llamas’ accusations without expressing personal opinion. It presents the situation objectively and avoids emotional language.
ABC (España)IndependentProgressiveFactual 55Objective 409 days ago The carcoma moves to Interior.On July 19, 2026, ABC (Spain) reported that allegations of corruption, specifically indications of illegal practices, have shifted from the Ministry of Transport under José Luis Ábalos to the Ministry of Interior. This shift follows reports from the National Anti-Corruption Unit (UCO) suspecting irregularities in the construction of a prison in Guipúzcoa valued at 42 million euros. Additionally, the article mentions the activities of the 'fontanera' (plumber) from Ferraz, which led to the investigation of the Director General of the Guardia Civil and the DAO (Director General of the Civil Guard) as suspects for allegedly supporting Leire Díez’s campaign to undermine police investigations into the Sanchez family. After Ábalos was sentenced to nearly a quarter of a century, and considering he faces more trials, suspicions now point toward the Ministry of Interior, led by Grande-Marlaska. However, the management of this ministry has been under scrutiny since the beginning, evidenced by continuous criticisms from Parliament over its poor performance in various areas.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the shifting accusations of corruption as a political issue, emphasizing the involvement of high-profile figures and institutions. It highlights the actions of the UCO and the potential influence of political allies (e.g., Leire Díez) in undermining judicial processes. The tone is
Why factuality (55): The article makes several specific claims about the transfer of corruption suspicions from the Ministry of Transport to the Ministry of Interior, citing the UCO investigations into a prison construction project in Gipuzkoa valued at 42 million euros. However, these details lack clear sourcing or ver
Why objectivity (40): The article uses emotionally charged language like 'carcoma de la corrupción' (worm of corruption) and frames the situation in a highly critical manner toward the Ministry of Interior and its leadership, Grande-Marlaska. It also implies guilt or wrongdoing without providing balanced perspectives or
elDiario.esIndependentProgressiveFactual 40Objective 559 days ago Criminal delusionThe article discusses the growing concern over the politicization of justice and the increasing complexity of legal cases involving corruption and influence trading in Spain. It highlights examples such as the handling of positions in a Local Employment Relationship (RPT) by local councils, the prosecution of Begoña Gómez for alleged corruption, and the controversial case of Cristina Álvarez, who was implicated through complex legal interpretations. The author questions the credibility of these legal proceedings, suggesting they may reflect a broader societal confusion between legitimate governance and criminal behavior. The piece also critiques the lack of clarity in legal outcomes, pointing out inconsistencies in how different authorities interpret similar actions, and raises concerns about the potential for widespread legal condemnation based on ambiguous evidence.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue of legal and political corruption as a systemic problem affecting democratic institutions, emphasizing the need for judicial independence and the separation of powers. It criticizes the politicization of legal processes and suggests that current legal interpretations may
Why factuality (40): This article appears to discuss a completely unrelated case involving Cerdán and Servinabar, with no connection to the primary source document about Victor de Aldama and Felix Bolaños. As such, it lacks relevance to the main event and contains no factual claims aligned with the primary source.
Why objectivity (55): The article uses vague and generalized language, making it difficult to assess its objectivity. It seems to focus more on expressing concern over broader issues of corruption rather than providing a balanced analysis of the specific case mentioned.
%2520de%2520la%2520Guardia%2520Civil%2C%2520Manuel%2520Llamas%2C%2520a%2520su%2520llegada%2520para%2520declarar%2520ante%2520el%2520juez%2520de%2520la%2520Audiencia%2520Nacional&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
Spain
![[EDITORIAL] Ang patlang sa retoriko at realidad ni Pangulong Marcos](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=newsinfo.inquirer.net%2Ffiles%2F2026%2F07%2FSona-24July2026.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
