The Audiencia Provincial of Madrid has given its final approval to the last phase of the investigation led by Judge Juan Carlos Peinado into Begoña Gómez, wife of Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez. This decision comes after two years and three months of a highly contentious process marked by numerous appeals, corrections, and legal challenges. The ruling allows the case to proceed before a jury for charges of influence peddling and misappropriation of public funds, while dismissing other accusations such as corruption in business dealings and embezzlement. The Audiencia Provincial’s resolution was announced this Thursday, marking a critical turning point in the ongoing legal battle involving high-profile figures linked to the Spanish government. The investigation, initially launched under Judge Peinado, has been subject to constant scrutiny and revision by the Audiencia Provincial. Over the past two years, multiple decisions made by Peinado, ranging from arrests and searches to formal charges, have faced legal challenges. These included three complaints alleging procedural irregularities, with several individuals, including businessman Carlos Barrabés and his assistant in La Moncloa, Cristina Álvarez, being investigated. The Audiencia Provincial has repeatedly intervened to correct Peinado's actions, annulling certain orders and questioning the validity of some charges based on insufficient evidence. Among the key rulings were the annulment of searches conducted on Barrabés while he was hospitalized and isolated, the removal of charges against several officials, including the rector of the Universidad Complutense, Joaquín Goyache, and the head of the Instituto de Empresa, Juan José Güemes. Additionally, the Audiencia Provincial prohibited further investigations into alleged crimes, such as the rescue of Air Europa, which were based on speculation or media reports rather than solid evidence. Even the Supreme Court rejected a detailed justification submitted by Peinado to charge Justice Minister Félix Bolaños. In its latest decision, the Audiencia Provincial upheld the core aspects of Peinado’s investigation but removed two of the four charges originally intended for Gómez and her assistant, Álvarez. It also revoked precautionary measures such as passport confiscations and mandatory monthly appearances at court, citing questionable grounds for these restrictions. Despite these changes, the Audiencia Provincial maintained the central allegations of influence peddling and misappropriation of public funds, allowing the case to move forward toward trial. The decision was influenced significantly by Maria del Rosario Esteban Meilán, president of Section 23 of the Audiencia Provincial. Her role in shaping the outcome of the case has drawn attention, particularly due to her aspirations to join the Supreme Court’s Second Chamber, which handles major criminal cases. This chamber recently sentenced former Socialist minister José Luis Ábalos to 24 years in prison and former Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz to two years of disqualification. Esteban Meilán’s leadership in Section 23 played a crucial role in both correcting and supporting Peinado’s investigative strategies, ensuring that the core charges against Gómez remained viable despite widespread criticism of the initial proceedings. Section 23’s involvement in the case has been complex, balancing the need to uphold legal standards with the political implications of pursuing high-profile figures. While they have corrected many of Peinado’s more controversial moves, they have also supported the continuation of the investigation into Gómez, arguing that there is sufficient probability to justify her prosecution. Their reasoning hinges on the idea that someone in Gómez’s position, wife of the prime minister, could exert undue influence to secure private benefits through public office, even if the evidence is circumstantial. The recent ruling by Section 23 marks a pivotal moment in the case, setting the stage for a potential trial by jury. The decision reflects a delicate balance between legal rigor and the broader political context surrounding the investigation. As the process moves forward, the focus will remain on whether the remaining charges can withstand further legal scrutiny and whether the evidence presented will be deemed sufficient to bring Gómez to trial.
3 reports
El PaísIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 704 days agoThe Madrid Provincial Court has approved the final step in the investigation led by Judge Juan Carlos Peinado, which has been marked by numerous appeals and corrections over two years and three months. The case involves Begoña Gómez, wife of Spain’s Prime Minister, along with businessman Carlos Barrabés and his assistant at La Moncloa, Cristina Álvarez. The court has authorized the continuation of the trial by jury for charges of influence peddling and embezzlement, while dismissing the charges of corruption in business dealings and misappropriation. This decision follows extensive legal proceedings involving multiple appeals before the court.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the judicial decision neutrally, focusing on procedural developments rather than taking a stance on the guilt or innocence of any parties involved. It reports on the court's resolution without apparent ideological framing or biased language.
Why factuality (85): The article presents a clear summary of the Audiencia Provincial's decision to allow the process to continue, noting the numerous appeals and corrections made. It accurately reflects the cross-source consensus on the legal status of Begoña Gómez and the changes in charges. The factual claims are wel
Why objectivity (70): While the article is generally neutral, it does present some emotionally charged descriptions such as 'polémica instrucción' which might slightly skew the reader's understanding of the situation. However, it remains more balanced compared to the previous articles.
elDiario.esIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 552 days agoThe article discusses the potential promotion of Judge María del Rosario Esteban Meilán to the Supreme Court’s Criminal Chamber, following her role in supporting Judge Juan Carlos Peinado’s investigation into Begoña Gómez, the wife of Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez. Five judges from the Provincial Court of Madrid have approved the core aspects of Peinado’s complex investigation, which charges Gómez with influence peddling and embezzlement. Esteban Meilán, as head of Section 23 of the Provincial Court, played a central role in this decision. The article notes that while her section has corrected some of Peinado’s more controversial claims—such as linking Gómez to the Air Europa rescue or accusing her of professional misconduct—it has largely supported his accusations of influence peddling and embezzlement, which require trial by jury under Spanish law. This support was highlighted in December 2023, when the section reversed its earlier stance to allow the investigation into Gómez’s assistant, María Cristina Álvarez.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of judicial proceedings involving high-profile political figures and does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. It reports on legal decisions made by judges without taking a clear ideological stance.
Why factuality (80): This article provides details about the president of the Section who supported Judge Peinado and her aspirations for a higher court position. It aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the legal proceedings and the involvement of specific judges. However, it includes information about poten
Why objectivity (55): The article has a more subjective tone when discussing the political ambitions of María del Rosario Esteban Meilán. Phrases like 'aspira a la Sala de lo Penal del Supremo' imply a certain level of speculation rather than neutrality.
elDiario.esIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 605 days ago The Provincial Court suspends Judge Peinado in almost everything but blesses his hunt against Begoña GómezThe Provincial Court of Madrid has largely suspended Judge Juan Carlos Peinado's investigative actions in a case involving Begoña Gómez, wife of the Prime Minister, but has allowed the prosecution to continue against her for corruption and abuse of influence. The court has annulled numerous decisions by Peinado, citing violations of fundamental rights and lack of justification, yet has maintained the core charges against Gómez. Despite these criticisms, the court has permitted the ongoing investigation into Gómez while dismissing some specific accusations and precautionary measures. The court's rulings suggest a complex balance between oversight and allowing the legal process to proceed.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the court's suspension of Judge Peinado's actions as a necessary check on power, particularly targeting high-profile individuals like the wife of the Prime Minister. While it acknowledges the court's criticism of Peinado's methods, it emphasizes the continuation of the legal case,
Why factuality (75): The article reports on the suspension of Judge Peinado by the Audiencia Provincial but maintains his investigation into Begoña Gómez. It describes the legal process and criticisms of Peinado’s methods, aligning with the cross-source consensus that there were significant procedural issues. However, i
Why objectivity (60): The tone is somewhat critical of Judge Peinado, using phrases like 'varapalos' and 'cacería judicial', which suggest a biased perspective. The article also mentions the political implications of the case, which may influence the reader's perception.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Spain
