The incredulity of Zapatero's partner exasperated Judge Calama: "I don't like being made the wheel of the hamster"
Julio Martínez Martínez, a close associate of former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, submitted a letter to National Court Judge José Luis Calama expressing willingness to cooperate in an investigation into whether Zapatero led a network of influence that helped secure a public rescue of over €50 million for the airline Plus Ultra. Three months later, the transcript of Martínez’s testimony was released, revealing that Judge Calama was dissatisfied with Martínez’s explanations regarding financial transactions linked to Venezuela. During questioning, Martínez struggled to clarify the origins of payments from Chinese companies and repeatedly avoided directly linking Zapatero to these dealings. The judge expressed frustration with what he described as vague responses and generic terms like 'logistics' and 'management,' emphasizing the need for concrete information rather than circumlocution.
The Audiencia Provincial of Madrid has ordered the Unidad Central Operativa (UCO) of the National Police Corps to cross-check financial, tax, and Social Security data related to Alberto González Amador, the partner of Madrid's regional president, Isabel Díaz Ayuso. This decision comes after the court overturned a previous ruling by Judge Antonio Viejo, who had limited the investigation to banking records. The new order allows the UCO to access tax information and data from the Treasury General of the Social Security, which were previously denied due to concerns over their relevance and potential invasiveness. The move follows a separate investigation into alleged corruption involving González Amador and his business dealings with Quirón Prevención, a healthcare company. The case centers around the purchase of a company named Círculo de Belleza S.L. for approximately 500,000 euros in December 2020, which investigators suspect was intended as a bribe to secure contracts with Quirón Prevención. The UCO requested this expanded access earlier in the year, but Judge Viejo initially restricted the scope to banking data, citing the need to prioritize the analysis of bank accounts before moving on to more invasive measures. In its ruling, the Audiencia Provincial emphasized the necessity of combining banking data with tax and Social Security information to advance the investigation efficiently. The court noted that both the prosecution and González Amador’s defense have shown willingness to facilitate this process, aiming to conclude the probe swiftly. The decision was made following a challenge by the Public Prosecutor’s Office, which argued that withholding tax data significantly hindered the investigation. González Amador faces two separate legal proceedings. One involves allegations of tax fraud totaling 350,000 euros through the use of fake invoices for services not rendered. He has been formally charged and awaits trial. The second case focuses on the alleged bribery linked to the acquisition of Círculo de Belleza S.L., with prosecutors suggesting the payment was made to secure favorable treatment from Quirón Prevención. The investigation into this matter has progressed slowly, prompting the UCO to request broader access to financial records. The Audiencia Provincial’s decision marks a significant shift in the investigation, allowing for a more comprehensive examination of González Amador’s financial activities. The court highlighted the importance of analyzing all available data to determine whether any illegal transactions occurred and to assess the extent of any potential wrongdoing. The ruling underscores the need for thoroughness in the investigation while respecting the rights of the individuals involved. The UCO had previously obtained authorization to collect banking data from 16 entities, covering the period from January 1, 2014, to the current date. However, the expansion to include tax and Social Security information represents a crucial step forward in understanding the full scope of the financial activities under scrutiny. The court’s decision reflects a commitment to ensuring that all relevant evidence is considered in reaching a just resolution to the case. The investigation into González Amador is part of a broader effort to address allegations of corruption within the business sector and to ensure transparency in corporate dealings. As the UCO moves forward with the expanded inquiry, the focus will remain on uncovering any potential misconduct and determining the appropriate legal consequences for those found guilty.
Julio Martínez Martínez, a close associate of former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, submitted a letter to National Court Judge José Luis Calama expressing willingness to cooperate in an investigation into whether Zapatero led a network of influence that helped secure a public rescue of over €50 million for the airline Plus Ultra. Three months later, the transcript of Martínez’s testimony was released, revealing that Judge Calama was dissatisfied with Martínez’s explanations regarding financial transactions linked to Venezuela. During questioning, Martínez struggled to clarify the origins of payments from Chinese companies and repeatedly avoided directly linking Zapatero to these dealings. The judge expressed frustration with what he described as vague responses and generic terms like 'logistics' and 'management,' emphasizing the need for concrete information rather than circumlocution.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of judicial proceedings involving a high-profile individual connected to a former prime minister. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal process and the judge’s impa
A judge has questioned Julio Martinez Martinez, known as 'Julito,' who acted as a financial intermediary for former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero in the Plus Ultra case. During his testimony, Julito denied knowing the specific actions taken by Zapatero's team that allegedly led to receiving a bribe of 53 million euros to facilitate the rescue of the airline Plus Ultra through a public loan. The judge pointed out that if the company met the requirements set by the ministry, their involvement would not have been necessary unless they engaged in dealings with SEPI or other officials. Julito claimed he merely informed Zapatero about the company's activities but did not know the specifics of any interactions with authorities.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a legal interrogation involving a former prime minister and allegations of corruption. It does not exhibit clear bias toward either side, presenting the testimonies and questions from both the judge and the accused without overtly favoring one perspective over another.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.