Cheney's former cardiologist on Nyt: 'Trump doesn't have a nice wax'

Donald Trump has drawn new concerns over his health after former Vice President Dick Cheney’s long-time cardiologist, Dr. Jonathan Reiner, raised questions about the former president's physical condition in a recent op-ed published in The New York Times. According to reports, Reiner, who served as a physician for Cheney for nearly three decades, expressed doubts about Trump’s appearance and overall well-being based on publicly available medical records. Reiner emphasized that while he is not Trump’s personal doctor and has only reviewed the public portion of the president’s medical file, the sheer volume of documented issues raises red flags. He noted visible signs such as large bruises on both hands, swelling in the legs, and instances where Trump appeared unable to stay awake. Additionally, Reiner pointed out that Trump had undergone advanced imaging tests, on his heart and abdomen, for unclear reasons, further fueling speculation about his health status. The comments come amid growing public interest in the president’s health, with many questioning whether he is fit to carry out his duties. Reiner argued that the lack of a formal requirement for the U.S. president to certify their fitness for office represents a critical oversight. He suggested that the 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides a solution, allowing Congress to establish an independent commission to assess the president’s health and ability to govern. In his piece, Reiner also highlighted the unusual number of specialists who have evaluated Trump’s health. He questioned why so many doctors were consulted and what specific expertise each brought to the table. The involvement of 22 consultants, according to Reiner, suggests that the evaluation process was extensive, yet the results remain opaque to the general public. This discussion comes just days after a government report released earlier this week outlined key findings regarding Trump’s health. While the report did not provide detailed specifics, it confirmed that Trump had been assessed by multiple experts, including cardiologists, neurologists, and other specialists. The report also noted that some of these evaluations included more comprehensive diagnostic procedures than would typically be necessary for a sitting president. Reiner’s remarks have sparked renewed debate about transparency in presidential health assessments. Critics argue that the public deserves greater clarity on how such evaluations are conducted and what conclusions they reach. Meanwhile, supporters of Trump maintain that the administration has done enough to ensure his fitness for duty and that any concerns are speculative at best. As the conversation continues, attention will likely shift toward the potential implications of these health concerns. With the upcoming legislative session approaching, there could be increased pressure for lawmakers to address the issue formally. Some political analysts suggest that the controversy might influence the broader discourse around executive accountability and the role of medical oversight in governance. For now, the focus remains on the medical documentation and the interpretations of those who have examined it. As Reiner noted, the president’s visibility makes it difficult to ignore the physical signs that have emerged over time. Whether these observations lead to further action or simply remain part of ongoing public scrutiny remains to be seen.