ON
← Back to feed
Kyrsten Sinema Details Affair with Bodyguard in Legal Fight with His Ex-Wife: 'We Went Inside and Had Sex'
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter8 days ago

Kyrsten Sinema Details Affair with Bodyguard in Legal Fight with His Ex-Wife: 'We Went Inside and Had Sex'

Former Arizona Senator Kyrsten Sinema, who has since become an Independent, testified in a legal dispute involving her former bodyguard and current boyfriend, Matthew Ammel, and his ex-wife, Heather Ammel. The case centers around allegations that Sinema's relationship with Ammel, who was still married at the time, contributed to the dissolution of his marriage. During a deposition, Sinema described the start of their romantic relationship in late May 2024 while they were staying in an Airbnb in Napa, California. The ex-wife, Heather Ammel, filed a lawsuit in North Carolina under the state's 'homewrecker' law, which allows spouses to sue someone for ending a marriage through extramarital relationships. Sinema's legal team sought access to Heather Ammel's therapy records, prompting a legal challenge from Heather's attorneys, who argued the request was irrelevant to the case. The case highlights the intersection of personal relationships and legal accountability, particularly in states with specific laws addressing marital infidelity.

Former Arizona Senator Kyrsten Sinema has admitted to a romantic and sexual relationship with her former bodyguard, Matthew Ammel, in court filings related to a contentious "alienation of affection" lawsuit brought by his ex-wife, Heather Ammel. The case, which is being heard in North Carolina, alleges that Sinema contributed to the dissolution of Heather Ammel’s 14-year marriage by engaging in a relationship with her husband while he was still married. The lawsuit seeks compensation of at least $75,000 from Sinema. According to a deposition testimony dated July 31, Sinema confirmed that her relationship with Ammel began in May 2024 while she was still serving in the U.S. Senate. The affair, which she described as "romantic and intimate," spanned multiple locations, including California, Arizona, New York, and Washington, D.C., and involved frequent communication via phone calls, emails, and encrypted messaging apps. During the deposition, Sinema recounted a specific encounter at an Airbnb in Napa, California, where she and Ammel had sex after he kissed her outdoors. She claimed this was their first physical contact. The court documents reveal that the Ammels separated on November 1, 2024, and their divorce was finalized in March 2026. Sinema acknowledged that the relationship occurred while she was still in office and that she was aware of Ammel’s marital status. Despite this knowledge, she did not dispute the affair, though she argued that the relationship took place outside North Carolina, where the lawsuit was filed, thereby challenging the court’s jurisdiction over her. The legal battle has intensified as both parties have submitted additional filings to the court. On August 12, both sides presented supplementary briefs, deposition transcripts, and other evidence. Sinema has informed the court that she plans to call live witnesses to address the jurisdictional dispute. U.S. District Judge David A. Bragdon is currently reviewing these materials to determine whether the case can proceed in North Carolina or if Sinema’s motion to dismiss should be granted. Heather Ammel’s legal team has sought to gather more information about Sinema’s actions, including attempting to obtain documents from Heather’s therapist. Sinema’s attorney, Steven Epstein, issued a subpoena for records from 2024, but Heather’s lawyer, Thomas Van Camp, opposed the request, arguing that it was irrelevant to the jurisdictional question. The court is yet to rule on the validity of the subpoena. Sinema, a former Democrat who later became an independent, served in the U.S. Senate from 2019 until early 2025. Known for her moderate stance, she was one of the few senators who supported bipartisan legislation. She announced in March 2024 that she would not seek re-election, marking the end of her tenure in the Senate. Her decision to step down came amid growing scrutiny over her personal life and the ongoing legal proceedings. As the court continues to evaluate the jurisdictional issues, the outcome of this case could set a precedent for similar lawsuits involving public figures and private relationships. The next steps will depend on Judge Bragdon’s ruling, which is expected to provide clarity on whether the case proceeds to further discovery or is dismissed outright. For now, the focus remains on the legal arguments surrounding personal jurisdiction and the applicability of North Carolina’s "homewrecker" law to Sinema’s situation.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Newsweek logoNewsweekIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 808 days ago
Ex-Senator Kyrsten Sinema Details Affair With Bodyguard

Former Arizona Senator Kyrsten Sinema has admitted to a romantic and sexual relationship with Matthew Ammel, a former bodyguard, during her time in the Senate. This admission came through court filings and deposition testimony in an 'alienation of affection' lawsuit filed by Ammel's ex-wife, Heather Ammel, who claims Sinema contributed to the dissolution of her 14-year marriage. The case is based on North Carolina law allowing a deserted spouse to sue a third party for damaging a marital relationship. Sinema acknowledged the relationship began in 2024 while she was still serving in the Senate and involved communication across multiple states. The case has gained attention due to Sinema's political prominence. The court now needs to determine if it has personal jurisdiction over Sinema, with both parties submitting additional legal arguments.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a legal case involving a public figure without overtly endorsing or criticizing either side. It reports on court proceedings, legal arguments, and the implications of the case without taking a clear ideological stance. While the subject involves a high-

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the core facts from the primary source, including Sinema's deposition details about the affair starting in late May 2024 in California, the Airbnb location, and the nature of the relationship. It correctly mentions the legal context of North Carolina's alienation of af

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting the facts without overt bias. It includes quotes from the deposition and provides background on Sinema's political status. However, it does frame the situation with some contextual emphasis on Sinema's political profile, which could subtly

Breitbart News logoBreitbart NewsIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 658 days ago
Kyrsten Sinema Details Affair with Bodyguard in Legal Fight with His Ex-Wife: 'We Went Inside and Had Sex'

Former Arizona Senator Kyrsten Sinema, who has since become an Independent, testified in a legal dispute involving her former bodyguard and current boyfriend, Matthew Ammel, and his ex-wife, Heather Ammel. The case centers around allegations that Sinema's relationship with Ammel, who was still married at the time, contributed to the dissolution of his marriage. During a deposition, Sinema described the start of their romantic relationship in late May 2024 while they were staying in an Airbnb in Napa, California. The ex-wife, Heather Ammel, filed a lawsuit in North Carolina under the state's 'homewrecker' law, which allows spouses to sue someone for ending a marriage through extramarital relationships. Sinema's legal team sought access to Heather Ammel's therapy records, prompting a legal challenge from Heather's attorneys, who argued the request was irrelevant to the case. The case highlights the intersection of personal relationships and legal accountability, particularly in states with specific laws addressing marital infidelity.

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a personal relationship involving a public figure, the framing remains largely factual and balanced, presenting both sides of the legal dispute without overt ideological slant. The focus is on the legal implications rather than partisan commentary, and the narrative does

Why factuality (80): The article accurately conveys the main facts from the primary source, including the deposition details about the affair, the location, and the legal context. However, it incorrectly attributes the reporting of the deposition to 'The Arizona Republic' rather than TMZ, which is a minor factual error.

Why objectivity (65): The article exhibits a more biased tone, using phrases like 'grilled Sinema about the relationship' and emphasizing the 'racy texts and luxury trips,' which may sensationalize the content. It also frames the situation with a clear focus on the legal battle and Sinema's political identity, potentiall

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories