ON
← Back to feed
Kushner meets with Netanyahu after rare Hamas talks over stalled Gaza plan
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter3 days ago

Kushner meets with Netanyahu after rare Hamas talks over stalled Gaza plan

In August 2026, Jared Kushner, a senior advisor to former U.S. President Donald Trump, met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu following rare discussions with Hamas leaders in Cairo. These talks aimed to revive a stalled U.S.-backed peace plan for Gaza, which Israel has previously rejected. The plan includes Hamas' disarmament and Israel's withdrawal from Gaza, though Netanyahu has refused to commit to a military pullout unless Hamas is fully disarmed. Meanwhile, Hamas has expressed willingness to disarm if Israel halts attacks and begins withdrawing, but this depends on international recognition of a Palestinian state, a condition Israel currently opposes. The U.S. and Israel reportedly share the goal of a demilitarized Hamas but differ on how to achieve it. Domestic political pressures in Israel, particularly from far-right allies of Netanyahu, complicate these negotiations.

Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump's senior adviser and son-in-law, is set to embark on a high-stakes trip to Israel and Egypt next week to discuss the ongoing Gaza situation, according to multiple sources. The planned visits come amid mounting tensions surrounding the U.S.-backed initiative aimed at disarming Hamas and transferring control of Gaza to a new Palestinian technocratic government. Kushner's journey will include meetings with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and representatives from Egypt, Qatar, and Turkey, signaling continued U.S. efforts to mediate the crisis. Kushner's visit marks his first trip to Israel since January, reflecting the urgency of the current negotiations. The White House and Trump's Board of Peace have been pushing forward with the next phase of the Gaza plan, focusing on disarming Hamas and potentially facilitating an Israeli withdrawal. However, the Netanyahu government has shown skepticism toward the U.S. proposal, particularly given the approaching October elections, which have heightened political sensitivities around the issue. A U.S. official emphasized that while there is alignment on the strategic objective, Israel has raised concerns about the plan. “We see eye-to-eye on the strategic goal, but Israel has expressed some doubts about the plan and we want to talk to them in order to make sure we are coordinated,” the official stated. The exact dates of Kushner's trip remain subject to change, though the overall timing suggests a focus on addressing these concerns before the Israeli elections. Trump announced two weeks prior that his Board of Peace had reached an agreement with Hamas to disarm and transition civilian and security control of Gaza to a new Palestinian administration. However, Netanyahu publicly rejected this plan last week, citing pressure from coalition partners and political opponents. Despite his skepticism, Netanyahu reportedly promised to consider the plan following a recent phone call with Kushner. Additionally, he pledged to limit attacks on Gaza to allow the demilitarization process to commence, according to a U.S. official. A senior U.S. official noted that the White House interprets Netanyahu's rejection as primarily driven by political considerations rather than a definitive policy stance. “We understand Bibi's political needs. We have no problem with it as long as he continues to do what we ask, especially regarding restraining attacks in Gaza,” the official remarked. In response, Israel has significantly reduced its airstrikes on Gaza, and the Israeli military has withdrawn to the Yellow Line, aligning with the terms outlined in the agreement. Kushner is scheduled to travel to Israel alongside Nickolay Mladenov, the Gaza Board of Peace's designated "high representative." Their itinerary includes discussions with Netanyahu and other key Israeli officials. In addition to Israel, Kushner is expected to hold meetings in Cairo with mediators from Egypt, Qatar, and Turkey, aiming to consolidate support for the peace initiative among regional stakeholders. The White House is keen to avoid delays in implementing the next phase of the plan due to the Israeli elections. Meanwhile, Netanyahu seeks to balance his political interests with maintaining relations with Trump, avoiding any open conflict ahead of the vote. “The elections are making everyone hysterical,” a U.S. official acknowledged, highlighting the complex dynamics at play. Kushner and Mladenov aim to establish a clear path forward for Gaza over the coming months, ensuring each step is executed meticulously. “We are not rushing into anything here. We want to make sure all steps in Gaza are being done properly,” another U.S. official said. They emphasize that their approach offers a preferable alternative to the current instability in the region. A Board of Peace official confirmed that Kushner, Mladenov, and their teams maintain regular communication with Israeli authorities, striving to advance Trump's Gaza peace plan. These discussions cover a range of shared objectives and mutual concerns, with both sides agreeing on the ultimate goal of achieving stability in the region. “What is critical is that we both agree on the desired outcome and are finding ways to accelerate progress,” the official added.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesParty-alignedCenterFactual 80Objective 706 days ago
Kushner sits with Netanyahu to talk Gaza after 2-hour meeting with Hamas

Jared Kushner, a senior advisor to former U.S. President Donald Trump, met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem following a two-hour discussion with Hamas leaders in Egypt. The talks centered around a U.S.-backed 15-point roadmap aimed at advancing a truce in Gaza. While Hamas has reportedly accepted the plan, including commitments to disarmament, Israel insists that Hamas must fully disarm before any Israeli troop withdrawals from Gaza can occur. Netanyahu has previously indicated intentions to expand Israeli control over the region, currently holding about 60% of Gaza. Regional powers such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and others condemned Israel's rejection of the roadmap, urging the U.S. and the Board of Peace to ensure its implementation. The situation remains tense, with no immediate response from Israel or the White House.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation in Gaza and the international negotiations surrounding it in a balanced manner, without overtly favoring any side. It reports on the positions of various stakeholders, Hamas, Israel, the U.S., and regional powers, without using biased language or omitting key points.

Why factuality (80): The article accurately describes Kushner's meetings with Hamas and Netanyahu, referencing the 15-point plan and the requirement for Hamas disarmament. It mentions the demand by Hamas for Israel to halt attacks and withdraw to the yellow line, which aligns with the primary document's content.

Why objectivity (70): The article uses phrases like 'Israel has been conducting near-daily attacks on the Gaza Strip' and 'the roadmap agreed to last month was not open to changes,' which may imply criticism of Israel's actions. The tone is somewhat biased in favor of Hamas.

NBC News logoNBC NewsIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 706 days ago
Kushner meets with Netanyahu after rare Hamas talks over stalled Gaza plan

In August 2026, Jared Kushner, a senior advisor to former U.S. President Donald Trump, met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu following rare discussions with Hamas leaders in Cairo. These talks aimed to revive a stalled U.S.-backed peace plan for Gaza, which Israel has previously rejected. The plan includes Hamas' disarmament and Israel's withdrawal from Gaza, though Netanyahu has refused to commit to a military pullout unless Hamas is fully disarmed. Meanwhile, Hamas has expressed willingness to disarm if Israel halts attacks and begins withdrawing, but this depends on international recognition of a Palestinian state, a condition Israel currently opposes. The U.S. and Israel reportedly share the goal of a demilitarized Hamas but differ on how to achieve it. Domestic political pressures in Israel, particularly from far-right allies of Netanyahu, complicate these negotiations.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation neutrally, citing multiple perspectives, U.S., Israeli, and Hamas, without overtly favoring any side. It reports on the stalled peace plan, the positions of all parties involved, and the internal Israeli political dynamics without using biased language or selective o

Why factuality (75): The article mentions Kushner meeting with Hamas and Netanyahu, aligning with the primary document. However, it does not mention the actual content of the 15-point plan or the specific details of the road map, such as Hamas agreeing to the deal. The article references the U.S. trying to advance a cea

Why objectivity (70): The article uses phrases like 'fragile ceasefire brokered in October' and 'powerful National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir condemned efforts toward peace,' which introduce bias and frame the situation as a conflict rather than a negotiated process. The tone leans slightly towards portraying Isra

The New York Times (US) logoThe New York Times (US)Independent🔒CenterFactual 60Objective 753 days ago
Trump Officials Move to Fund Gaza Peacekeepers Even as Peace Plan Falters

The U.S. State Department notified Congress of plans to fund a Gaza stabilization force on the same day the president's Board of Peace unveiled a strategy to disarm Hamas. This development comes amid ongoing challenges in implementing peace initiatives, raising questions about the coordination and effectiveness of U.S.-led efforts in the region.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual developments without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It reports on two separate actions by the U.S. government, funding a stabilization force and announcing a disarming plan, without expressing approval or criticism of either action. The framing remains客观

Why factuality (60): The article mentions the funding of a stabilization force and the Board of Peace's plan to disarm Hamas, but it lacks specific details about the 15-point plan itself. It does not reference the primary document's content, such as the phased implementation or the role of the National Committee for the

Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the actions of the State Department and the Board of Peace. It avoids taking a stance on the dispute between Israel and Hamas, presenting facts without editorializing.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories