Germany's government has unveiled plans to tighten regulations around sick leave, requiring employees to obtain a medical certificate starting from their first day of absence due to illness. This move, announced by Chancellor Friedrich Merz of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), aims to curb high rates of absenteeism in companies, which have been deemed too high following the post-pandemic surge in sick days. The new rules would replace the current requirement, which mandates a medical certificate only after three consecutive days of absence. Under the proposed changes, workers would need to visit their doctor immediately upon falling ill, rather than waiting to see if symptoms improve over the initial days.
The rationale behind this shift is rooted in concerns about Germany’s competitiveness on the global stage. Merz emphasized that excessive sick days place German businesses at a disadvantage compared to other countries. He described the situation as one where "exorbitant" sickness absences after the pandemic could not be ignored. The government sees this measure as necessary to ensure that companies can maintain productivity without being burdened by unnecessary absences. However, the decision was framed as difficult but essential, given the commitments made within the coalition committee.
Implementation of these stricter guidelines will involve modifying existing legal frameworks. Currently, the obligation to provide a medical certificate is outlined in the Entgeltfortzahlungsgesetz (Wage Continuation Act), which would require amendments. Additionally, the possibility of obtaining a sick note via telephone—a provision introduced in late 2023 during the pandemic—would be eliminated. This change aligns with recent demands from the CDU party congress, which argued that making it easier to obtain a sick note encouraged unnecessary absences, often referred to as “bedside decisions.”
The timeline for implementing these changes remains uncertain. While the legal framework exists, specific enforcement mechanisms will depend on local agreements between employers and employees, including individual contracts, workplace agreements, or collective bargaining agreements. The removal of telephone-based sick notes is governed by a directive from the Joint Federal Committee of Physicians, Health Insurance Funds, and Hospitals, which could be amended or revoked through legislation.
Medical professionals have expressed strong opposition to the proposal. The Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), representing general practitioners, criticized the plan as irrational, arguing that forcing millions of people to visit overcrowded clinics solely to fill out forms would exacerbate healthcare system pressures. They suggested that certificates should only be required after four or five days of illness. Similarly, the House Doctors Association warned that minor infections, which typically last just one or two days, would lead to increased congestion in waiting rooms.
Despite these concerns, the government maintains that the goal is to reduce overall sick days. By increasing the administrative hurdle for taking time off, the hope is that some individuals might reconsider whether they truly need to take a day off. Employers, represented by the Federation of German Employer Associations, welcomed the initiative, noting that Germany already lags behind many nations in terms of work hours and absenteeism. However, critics argue that the reform does not address deeper issues such as the generous nature of Germany’s welfare system, which includes long periods of unpaid leave and substantial health benefits.
Currently, Germany spends more than 80 billion euros annually on wage continuation for sick employees, a financial burden primarily borne by employers. Critics suggest that more drastic measures, such as introducing layoff days and reducing the duration of benefit payments, would be more effective in curbing absenteeism. These proposals were recently recommended by the Finance Commission for Health but remain politically contentious.
The effectiveness of the new rules remains to be seen. While the immediate impact on reducing sick days is unclear, the policy reflects a broader effort by the government to balance worker protections with economic competitiveness. As discussions continue, stakeholders from both the public and private sectors will likely scrutinize the implementation and its outcomes over the coming years.
5 reports
heise onlineIndependentRightyesterdayThe German government, led by Chancellor Friedrich Merz of the CDU, is planning stricter rules for sick leave, requiring employees to provide medical certificates from the first day of illness rather than the fourth day as currently mandated. The coalition aims to reduce high absenteeism rates, which Merz calls 'exorbitant,' particularly after the pandemic. The new regulations would eliminate telephone-based sick leave notifications, a practice introduced during the coronavirus crisis to prevent spread. While the exact implementation timeline remains unclear, changes would require amendments to existing laws. Medical professionals have criticized the measures, arguing they could lead to unnecessary strain on healthcare facilities.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the proposed reforms as necessary to address 'exorbitant' sick leave rates and protect businesses from 'competitive disadvantage.' It emphasizes the economic rationale behind the policy, aligning with conservative priorities. The focus on reducing absenteeism and the criticism of'
Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒RightyesterdayThe article discusses proposed reforms aimed at reducing 'blau machen'—the practice of faking illness to avoid work—in Germany. It argues that current rules allow workers to take sick days without medical proof until the third day, which encourages fraudulent behavior. The new proposals require medical certification from the first day of sickness, aiming to reduce absenteeism and prevent fake illnesses. While some stakeholders like doctors and health insurance companies fear increased bureaucracy and costs, the article suggests that video-based sick notes could be more reliable than phone reports. It also criticizes the current system for allowing high rates of absenteeism, particularly on weekends and after major events, and calls for further measures such as shorter sick leave periods and reduced sick pay.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the reform as a necessary step to address fraud, implying that the current system is too lenient and encourages dishonesty. It supports stricter requirements for sick leave while criticizing the existing system’s tolerance for absenteeism. Although it acknowledges potential downs,
BildIndependentCenteryesterdayThe article discusses the requirements related to the mandatory medical certificate (Attestpflicht) for employees who wish to take sick leave starting from their first day of illness. It provides information on what individuals need to know regarding this regulation, likely including the process for obtaining a medical certificate, the responsibilities of employers, and potential implications for workers. The content appears to focus on clarifying legal obligations and practical steps for both employees and employers under German labor laws.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on explaining a specific legal requirement (Attestpflicht) related to sick leave in Germany. There is no evident ideological framing, loaded language, or one-sided sourcing. It appears to provide factual information without clear bias toward any political perspective.
HandelsblattIndependent🔒CenteryesterdayThe German newspaper Handelsblatt reports on a new requirement regarding sick leave certificates in the workplace. Starting soon, employees who take time off due to illness will need to provide a medical certificate confirming their condition. This change aims to reduce abuse of sick leave and ensure that workers are genuinely ill when they take time off. The policy is part of broader efforts to address labor market issues and improve workplace efficiency. Employers and healthcare providers are expected to adapt to this new regulation, which could impact both employee rights and employer responsibilities.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a policy update without overtly favoring any political side. It focuses on the implementation of a new regulation and does not include biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing that would indicate a clear ideological lean.
n-tvIndependentCenteryesterdayGerman employees will no longer be able to report sick days by phone. Starting soon, workers are required to submit a medical certificate for any absence, even on the first day of illness. This change aims to reduce abuse of sick leave and ensure proper documentation of absences. Employers and labor organizations have expressed mixed reactions, with some supporting the move for accountability and others warning of potential administrative burdens. The new regulation reflects broader efforts to streamline workplace practices and improve transparency in employee attendance.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a policy change related to workplace regulations without overtly favoring one side. It includes general reactions from employers and labor groups but does not emphasize one perspective over another. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the policy itself rather than taking a
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Germany
