Fundraiser for baby orphaned by speeding driver in Polish city reaches 1 million zloty
An eight-month-old baby, Oliwier, survived a tragic accident in Kraków, Poland, where his parents were killed by a speeding driver. The incident occurred on August 22, 2026, when a 26-year-old man, Hubert B., struck the couple on Solna Street, exceeding the speed limit by approximately 40 km/h. Oliwier was hospitalized with injuries requiring medical treatment, though his condition is improving. The case has sparked public outrage and calls for stricter enforcement against reckless driving. A fundraising campaign, initiated by supporters, has surpassed its goal, raising over 1 million zloty (€231,000) to secure Oliwier's future. The child's grandfather confirmed the family's approval of the fundraiser, and legal custody has been transferred to Oliwier's uncle.
Kraków, Poland’s second-largest city, has officially revoked its ban on fireworks following a court ruling that declared the measure invalid. The decision came after the city council opted not to appeal a ruling by the Provincial Administrative Court, which found the ban exceeded the authority of local officials and violated constitutional rights. The court ruled in late June that the ban, introduced in November 2025, was disproportionate and unnecessary for protecting public health or safety. The fireworks restriction, initially imposed by Kraków’s city council, prohibited the use of fireworks, firecrackers, sparklers, and other pyrotechnic materials for entertainment purposes. The ban applied to both public and private property, with exemptions only allowed during the New Year’s celebrations of 2026. The city claimed the measure was intended to safeguard the lives, health, and peace of residents, citing concerns over noise, air pollution, and potential harm to humans and animals. Some council members also highlighted the need to protect vulnerable groups such as World War Two veterans and Ukrainian refugees, who might suffer from trauma related to loud noises. Support for the ban was reflected in a city survey conducted at the time, which showed that 67.5% of respondents favored a year-round prohibition on fireworks, while 31.2% opposed it. However, the policy faced immediate criticism from various quarters. The provincial governor, Krzysztof Klęczar, challenged the ban, arguing that it infringed upon constitutional freedoms and hindered local businesses. He contended that the restrictions were not proportional and failed to justify the loss of personal liberties or economic activity. The Association of Pyrotechnic Importers and Distributors, represented by Marta Smolińska, condemned the ban as an “extreme solution” that would negatively affect the industry. Instead of outright bans, she advocated for promoting responsible use of pyrotechnics. National parks in Poland also urged citizens to avoid using fireworks during New Year’s Eve to prevent disturbing wildlife, which can emerge from hibernation due to sudden noise. The court’s ruling echoed these concerns, emphasizing that the city lacked the authority to impose such broad restrictions and that the measures were not justified under existing laws. The court specifically noted that there was no necessity to protect public health or safety through the ban, and that the restrictions went beyond the scope of local governance. The ruling also mandated that Kraków cover the legal costs associated with the case. Despite the court’s decision, the issue remains contentious at the national level. In 2021, the Civic Coalition, which later became Poland’s governing party, proposed a national law to ban fireworks, citing the distress and even deaths of pets and wild animals caused by loud noises. While the proposal did not pass into law, it reflects ongoing debate about the balance between public safety and individual freedoms. With the current ban lifted, the future of fireworks in Kraków remains uncertain. Local authorities may consider alternative measures to address concerns about noise and pollution, while businesses and advocacy groups continue to push for more nuanced approaches. As the city moves forward, the focus will likely shift toward education and regulation rather than outright prohibition. For now, the decision marks a clear reversal of policy, driven by judicial intervention and the recognition of limitations in local authority.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter