ON
← Back to feed
Cuba: 'US has no authority to judge our reforms', says Havana
World🏛️ PoliticsCenter14 days ago

Cuba: 'US has no authority to judge our reforms', says Havana

Cuba has rejected U.S. criticism of its recent economic reforms, stating that Washington has no authority to judge its policies. The Cuban government announced this week a series of market-opening measures aimed at liberalizing the economy, despite months of pressure from the United States, which has intensified sanctions against Cuba. The U.S. government described these reforms as 'superficial smoke and mirrors' and accused Cuba of being under collective punishment. Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez emphasized that the U.S. has no legal, moral, or political right to criticize Cuba's decisions, which are made to address the effects of American economic aggression. Tensions between the two nations have escalated further since early this year, particularly after the U.S. military intervention in Venezuela, leading to additional sanctions and legal actions against Cuban entities and leaders.

Cuba is undergoing its most significant economic reforms since the revolution of 1959, marking a major shift in its long-standing socialist model. The National Assembly of People’s Power has approved 175 changes proposed by Premier Manuel Marrero, which aim to introduce elements of free-market economics into the country’s economy. These reforms come under intense pressure from U.S. sanctions, which have significantly worsened Cuba’s already fragile economic situation. One of the most notable aspects of these reforms is the privatization of sectors such as businesses, banks, and real estate, areas previously controlled entirely by the state. This includes allowing private banks access to the financial sector and enabling private real estate development on the island. Additionally, the government will permit the sale of state-owned properties to both national and foreign entities. The Assembly passed the reforms unanimously, despite the absence of political parties in the parliament, where members are drawn from local communities. Former President Raúl Castro has publicly supported these changes, signaling a potential shift in the direction of Cuba’s economic policy.

The reforms mark a turning point for Cuba, moving away from its rigidly centralized socialist system toward a more market-oriented approach. However, Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel emphasized that these measures are not a rejection of socialism but rather a necessary adaptation to the challenges posed by the longest and most severe economic blockade in history, imposed by the United States. He urged the assembly members to maintain confidence in the socialist framework while acknowledging the need for change. The reforms include allowing foreign investors to operate independently without being tied to state enterprises, permitting large private companies with more than 100 employees, and enabling foreign and overseas Cuban capital to participate on equal terms. Municipalities and companies can now engage directly in imports and exports, and state-owned enterprises are being transformed into public limited companies or open-capital corporations. Restrictions on private sector activities are also being reduced.

The economic crisis in Cuba has been exacerbated by decades of U.S. sanctions, which have intensified under former President Donald Trump. These sanctions have targeted individuals, including members of the Castro family and President Díaz-Canel, as well as the Cuban economy itself. The result has been severe fuel shortages, frequent power outages, and rising inflation, reaching nearly 30 percent annually. The population has also faced chronic scarcity, leading to an exodus of over one million Cubans in recent years—approximately 10 percent of the total population. While the Cuban government attributes these problems primarily to U.S. policies, critics argue that the rigid ideological stance of the Cuban regime, absolute state control, and historical resistance to meaningful change have contributed significantly to the current economic and social disaster. Previous reforms, such as allowing small and medium-sized private businesses starting in 2021, brought some relief but were insufficient to halt the decline due to political constraints.

The Cuban government has accused the United States of having no right to judge its economic reforms, stating that the U.S. lacks political, legal, or ethical authority to criticize the measures taken by Havana. In response to the reforms, the U.S. government described them as a superficial smokescreen for the Cuban regime. The tensions between the two nations have escalated further this year, particularly after the U.S. military intervention in Venezuela, which led to the removal of President Nicolás Maduro and the imposition of a de facto oil embargo on Cuba. Additional sanctions were introduced against Cuban businesses and leaders, and legal proceedings were initiated against Raúl Castro, the former president and brother of Fidel Castro, for alleged involvement in a case dating back to 1996. President Trump has repeatedly warned that Cuba poses an “exceptional threat” to American national security and has even threatened to take control of the island.

The reforms are seen as a last resort by the Cuban leadership to address the deepening economic crisis, driven by both internal factors and external pressures. Despite the government’s insistence on maintaining the socialist model, the practical implications of these changes suggest a move towards greater economic openness. However, the path forward remains uncertain, with numerous challenges and uncertainties still looming over Cuba’s future. The international community, particularly the United Nations, has expressed concern about the impact of U.S. sanctions on the most vulnerable segments of the Cuban population, warning that they could endanger lives. As the reforms take shape, their success will depend on how effectively they can address the complex interplay of domestic and foreign influences shaping Cuba’s destiny.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

3 reports

NOS Nieuws logoNOS NieuwsState / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 7517 days ago
Most radical economic reforms since 1959 in Cuba, under pressure from the US

Cuba is set to implement significant economic reforms, marking the most substantial changes to its socialist model since the 1959 revolution. The National Assembly of People's Power has approved 175 proposed changes under pressure from U.S. sanctions. Key reforms include privatization of businesses, banks, and real estate, allowing private entities and foreign investors access to previously state-controlled sectors. The reforms also permit the sale of state-owned properties to national and international organizations and individuals. The assembly unanimously approved the measures proposed by总理

Bias read (Center): The article presents the economic reforms in Cuba as a factual update without overtly favoring any political perspective. It describes the changes neutrally, citing the approval by the National Assembly and mentioning the influence of U.S. sanctions but does not take a stance on whether these are正面或

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): This Dutch article presents the economic reforms as significant but maintains a balanced view by noting they don't signal the end of socialism. It cites official sources and quotes leaders directly. Objectivity is slightly lower due to some framing that suggests the reforms are a response to externa

Folha de S.Paulo logoFolha de S.PauloIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 7214 days ago
Cuba makes belated reform amid economic ruin

Cuba has implemented significant economic reforms aimed at addressing deepening economic crisis, driven by both the rigid communist model and U.S. sanctions. The reforms include allowing private enterprises with more than 100 employees, foreign investment, private banks, and direct trade by municipalities. These changes mark a shift from previous limited measures, which had only partially alleviated issues like power outages, inflation, and chronic shortages. The Cuban government attributes much of the crisis to U.S. policies but acknowledges internal bureaucratic barriers have hindered progress. Despite these reforms, challenges remain in implementing lasting change.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of Cuba's economic situation, acknowledging both external factors like U.S. sanctions and internal issues such as ideological rigidity and bureaucratic obstacles. It does not overtly favor one side, providing context on the reforms and their potential impact.

Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 72): The Brazilian article details the economic crisis and reforms, providing statistical data and historical context. It acknowledges both U.S. sanctions and internal Cuban policies as contributing factors. While factual, it leans toward criticizing the Cuban regime, which affects objectivity. The tone

Kathimerini logoKathimeriniIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7015 days ago
Cuba: 'US has no authority to judge our reforms', says Havana

Cuba has rejected U.S. criticism of its recent economic reforms, stating that Washington has no authority to judge its policies. The Cuban government announced this week a series of market-opening measures aimed at liberalizing the economy, despite months of pressure from the United States, which has intensified sanctions against Cuba. The U.S. government described these reforms as 'superficial smoke and mirrors' and accused Cuba of being under collective punishment. Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez emphasized that the U.S. has no legal, moral, or political right to criticize Cuba's decisions, which are made to address the effects of American economic aggression. Tensions between the two nations have escalated further since early this year, particularly after the U.S. military intervention in Venezuela, leading to additional sanctions and legal actions against Cuban entities and leaders.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives—Cuba's rejection of U.S. criticism and the U.S. characterization of the reforms as superficial—without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from Cuban officials and references U.S. statements, providing balanced coverage of the dispute over a

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports the Cuban government's stance against U.S. criticism, citing specific measures taken under pressure from Washington. It provides context about the economic reforms and their political implications. However, it uses emotionally charged language like 'δήμιος της συλλογικ

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories