Spirit: Logar already knew everything. Hidden background: two projects alongside Golobič (?), and a dispute between Hano and Frangež The controversy surrounding former Prime Minister Anže Logar has intensified following reports suggesting he was aware of certain undisclosed matters related to two ongoing projects, with potential involvement of Golobič, though this connection remains unconfirmed. The situation has been further complicated by a long-standing disagreement between Hano and Frangež, which appears to have played a role in shaping recent political developments. These revelations were initially brought to light through a series of tweets and posts under the hashtag #Požareport, which have sparked widespread discussion among Slovenian political circles. According to one of the accounts, the affair did not lead to an early resignation of the National Council of the Republic (NPM), but it ultimately triggered Logar’s exit from politics, with plans for him to step down after the 2027 presidential elections. The incident has also revealed additional information, some of which continues to surface, regarding internal dynamics within the government. The posts suggest that Logar had prior knowledge of key aspects of these projects, raising questions about transparency and accountability. At the heart of the controversy is the figure of Miha Brejc, who has been accused of orchestrating a fake petition aimed at discrediting certain individuals. The petition, which was allegedly created using bots originating from India and Israel, was quickly withdrawn by Brejc and his associates, who claimed they were being targeted by external forces. This move has drawn criticism from some observers, who argue that such tactics undermine democratic processes and public trust in political institutions. Meanwhile, another development emerged regarding the election results for the State Council. Marko Gasser secured victory with 19 votes, while Ciril Kozjek received only 15. Sources indicate that the influential figure Zan Mahnic played a crucial role in Gasser's success, potentially acting as a key lobbyist for the candidate. This outcome has raised eyebrows, particularly given the broader context of political maneuvering and influence behind the scenes. In addition, there have been allegations against former director Jožko Kadivnik of SOVA-SLO, who reportedly appeared at the headquarters of the Public Procurement Agency in Ljubljana shortly after a relevant article was published. He arrived in a black BMW X5, parking in the guest area, which has led to speculation about his connections and possible involvement in ongoing investigations. The situation has also impacted media figures, including Katja Seruga, who was recently removed from her position at N1 Slovenia. Critics argue that such decisions reflect broader pressures on media independence and the integrity of journalistic practices. Meanwhile, other journalists, such as Grega Repovš, have expressed skepticism toward claims made by certain political actors, questioning their credibility and motives. There is also growing concern over the actions of the Slovenian media landscape, particularly regarding its response to issues of freedom of expression and democracy. For instance, during the summer months, some media outlets have been criticized for not adequately addressing concerns related to the removal of responsible editors from publications, such as the case involving Miran Lesjak at Dnevnik. The ongoing saga involving Miha Brejc and the alleged fake petition highlights deeper tensions within Slovenian politics, where personal rivalries and strategic alliances often play a significant role in shaping public discourse and policy outcomes. As the situation unfolds, it remains unclear how these developments will impact future political strategies and the overall stability of the country’s governance structure.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter