ON
← Back to feed
The head of the Pigeon Owl would/would work for Jankovic
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives5 days ago

The head of the Pigeon Owl would/would work for Jankovic

The article discusses various political developments and controversies in Slovenia, including allegations against public figures such as NPM (National Public Media) and Miha Brejc, who is compared to Steve Jobs. It mentions the potential departure of NPM from politics after an incident involving accusations of being an 'agent,' which led to their exit from politics after the 2027 presidential elections. The piece also covers the results of a vote for the National Council (Drzavni Svet), where Marko Gasser won with 19 votes while Ciril Kozjek received only 15. The article suggests that significant contributions came from MP Zan Mahnic, who is described as Gasser’s key lobbyist. Additionally, there are claims about the removal of Katja Seruga from her position at N1 Slovenija, and discussions around fake petitions and the involvement of certain individuals. The tone includes skepticism towards political figures and hints at behind-the-scenes influences.

Spirit: Logar already knew everything. Hidden background: two projects alongside Golobič (?), and a dispute between Hano and Frangež The controversy surrounding former Prime Minister Anže Logar has intensified following reports suggesting he was aware of certain undisclosed matters related to two ongoing projects, with potential involvement of Golobič, though this connection remains unconfirmed. The situation has been further complicated by a long-standing disagreement between Hano and Frangež, which appears to have played a role in shaping recent political developments. These revelations were initially brought to light through a series of tweets and posts under the hashtag #Požareport, which have sparked widespread discussion among Slovenian political circles. According to one of the accounts, the affair did not lead to an early resignation of the National Council of the Republic (NPM), but it ultimately triggered Logar’s exit from politics, with plans for him to step down after the 2027 presidential elections. The incident has also revealed additional information, some of which continues to surface, regarding internal dynamics within the government. The posts suggest that Logar had prior knowledge of key aspects of these projects, raising questions about transparency and accountability. At the heart of the controversy is the figure of Miha Brejc, who has been accused of orchestrating a fake petition aimed at discrediting certain individuals. The petition, which was allegedly created using bots originating from India and Israel, was quickly withdrawn by Brejc and his associates, who claimed they were being targeted by external forces. This move has drawn criticism from some observers, who argue that such tactics undermine democratic processes and public trust in political institutions. Meanwhile, another development emerged regarding the election results for the State Council. Marko Gasser secured victory with 19 votes, while Ciril Kozjek received only 15. Sources indicate that the influential figure Zan Mahnic played a crucial role in Gasser's success, potentially acting as a key lobbyist for the candidate. This outcome has raised eyebrows, particularly given the broader context of political maneuvering and influence behind the scenes. In addition, there have been allegations against former director Jožko Kadivnik of SOVA-SLO, who reportedly appeared at the headquarters of the Public Procurement Agency in Ljubljana shortly after a relevant article was published. He arrived in a black BMW X5, parking in the guest area, which has led to speculation about his connections and possible involvement in ongoing investigations. The situation has also impacted media figures, including Katja Seruga, who was recently removed from her position at N1 Slovenia. Critics argue that such decisions reflect broader pressures on media independence and the integrity of journalistic practices. Meanwhile, other journalists, such as Grega Repovš, have expressed skepticism toward claims made by certain political actors, questioning their credibility and motives. There is also growing concern over the actions of the Slovenian media landscape, particularly regarding its response to issues of freedom of expression and democracy. For instance, during the summer months, some media outlets have been criticized for not adequately addressing concerns related to the removal of responsible editors from publications, such as the case involving Miran Lesjak at Dnevnik. The ongoing saga involving Miha Brejc and the alleged fake petition highlights deeper tensions within Slovenian politics, where personal rivalries and strategic alliances often play a significant role in shaping public discourse and policy outcomes. As the situation unfolds, it remains unclear how these developments will impact future political strategies and the overall stability of the country’s governance structure.

Go to the primary sources (7)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

Svet24 logoSvet24IndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 606 days ago
Miha Brejc collects signatures for the release of Zoran Stevanovic

Miha Brejc, a Slovenian politician, is gathering signatures to initiate a process for the removal of Zorana Stevanović from her position. The initiative appears to be part of a broader effort to address concerns regarding her conduct or performance in office. While the specific allegations against Stevanović are not detailed in the headline, such initiatives typically require a formal petition process under Slovenian legal frameworks. The action reflects ongoing political tensions within the country, particularly around accountability and governance.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights an initiative led by a politician (Miha Brejc) aimed at removing another official (Zorana Stevanović), which suggests a focus on holding public figures accountable. While the exact nature of the allegations is not specified, the act of collecting signatures for removal implies

Why factuality (80): This article clearly states that Miha Brejc is collecting signatures to resolve the case of Zoran Stevanović. While it does not provide detailed background or sources, it aligns with the general topic of political petitions and legal actions. There is no direct contradiction with other reports, thou

Why objectivity (60): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, focusing on the action of collecting signatures without overtly expressing personal opinion or bias. However, it still carries some underlying political implications based on the subject matter.

Požareport logoPožareportIndependentProgressiveFactual 60Objective 356 days ago
The head of the Pigeon Owl would/would work for Jankovic

The article discusses various political developments and controversies in Slovenia, including allegations against public figures such as NPM (National Public Media) and Miha Brejc, who is compared to Steve Jobs. It mentions the potential departure of NPM from politics after an incident involving accusations of being an 'agent,' which led to their exit from politics after the 2027 presidential elections. The piece also covers the results of a vote for the National Council (Drzavni Svet), where Marko Gasser won with 19 votes while Ciril Kozjek received only 15. The article suggests that significant contributions came from MP Zan Mahnic, who is described as Gasser’s key lobbyist. Additionally, there are claims about the removal of Katja Seruga from her position at N1 Slovenija, and discussions around fake petitions and the involvement of certain individuals. The tone includes skepticism towards political figures and hints at behind-the-scenes influences.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of political figures like Miha Brejc in a negative light, suggesting they are involved in deceptive practices such as fake petitions. It implies that some politicians are influenced by external forces or have ulterior motives, which aligns with a left-leaning critique.

Why factuality (60): The article contains multiple fragmented statements and tweets that reference political figures and events but lacks clear sourcing or contextual clarity. It mentions an 'afera' (affair) involving NPM (National Council of the Republic) and suggests it led to someone's exit from politics, but no prim

Why objectivity (35): The tone is highly subjective and emotionally charged, using phrases like 'blamažna peticija' (shameful petition) and sarcastic remarks ('pod izgovorom, da so jih napadli boti...'). The article presents a biased narrative, suggesting conspiracy and misinformation without neutrality.

Požareport logoPožareportIndependentProgressiveFactual 45Objective 305 days ago
Logar knew all about it before, but the hidden background was that two projects included the Pigeon and a dispute between Han and Frange.

The article discusses various political and media-related developments in Slovenia, including allegations against Grega Repovš regarding his potential status as an agent, the political career of NPM, and controversies involving Miha Brejc and a fake petition. It references claims that Miha Brejc, a prominent figure, was involved in creating a fabricated petition, which he later withdrew under the pretext of being targeted by bots from India and Israel. The article also mentions the election results for the National Council, where Marko Gasser won with 19 votes over Ciril Kozjek’s 15, potentially influenced by lobbying efforts. Additionally, there are reports about the removal of Katja Seruga from her position at Nova Television and discussions around the involvement of public figures like NM Musar in legal matters.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents information that appears critical of certain political figures and highlights controversies surrounding them, suggesting a left-leaning perspective through its focus on alleged misconduct and political maneuvering.

Why factuality (45): The article contains vague and unverified claims such as 'Logar je že prej vse vedel' and references to unnamed individuals like 'Golobič' without providing evidence. It also mentions an 'afera' (scandal) leading to someone's exit from politics but does not clarify who or what exactly caused this. T

Why objectivity (30): The tone is highly subjective and emotionally charged, using phrases like 'nesmisel' and 'blamažna peticija.' The article seems to take sides, suggesting that certain groups are being attacked by bots, which introduces bias.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories