SloveniaThe article discusses the human tendency to make decisions based on personal preference rather than rational thought. It argues that many people avoid mental effort required for reasoned decision-making and dismiss it as 'philosophizing.' The piece highlights how this attitude leads to ignoring important truths, such as the lack of proper burial practices for victims of violence or the false narratives spread by media. It also critiques those who uncritically accept misinformation and emphasizes the dangers of overconfidence in one's own reasoning. The article contrasts individuals who rely solely on their own judgment (self-assured thinkers) with those who ignore reason (those who undervalue intellect), suggesting both groups share a common principle: acting according to personal preference. It concludes that while these two groups may coexist, they can also collaborate, with the latter supporting the former in power, creating a potentially stable social system.
Bias read (Center): While the article criticizes certain behaviors and attitudes, it does not clearly favor any specific political ideology or group. It presents a balanced critique of both those who undervalue reason and those who overvalue their own judgment, without taking a clear partisan stance. The discussion is哲
