ON
← Back to feed
New professions: AI creates a product in seconds, then a human fixes it for hours
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter9/2/2026

New professions: AI creates a product in seconds, then a human fixes it for hours

The article discusses the growing trend of 'content cleaning' or fixing errors generated by AI tools like ChatGPT, which has created new work opportunities for creative freelancers but also poses challenges. It highlights the shift in demand from original creative work to error correction, with many designers and content creators now spending significant time revising AI-generated outputs. The piece cites examples such as a Spanish graphic designer who reported that over 90% of her requests related to logos and packaging involved correcting AI-generated content. Data from platforms like Freelancer.com and Upwork show a sharp increase in job postings for AI error fixes, with some categories seeing over 87% growth between August 2025 and June 2026. However, this trend has led to concerns about reduced income for creatives and increased workload, as clients often offer low rates and require extensive revisions.

A new trend has emerged in creative industries, with artificial intelligence (AI) tools generating products in seconds, leaving human creators to spend hours refining them. This shift has created a niche market for freelancers who specialize in correcting AI-generated content, often for low pay and under challenging conditions. According to reports, this phenomenon is growing rapidly, driven by the increasing reliance on AI for initial design work, which then requires extensive human intervention before it can be used commercially. The rise of AI tools such as chatGPT has significantly altered the landscape of creative work. Spanish graphic designer Lisa, for example, noticed a major change in her workload after the release of chatGPT in 2022. Instead of receiving occasional orders for logos and packaging designs, she began getting far more requests to fix errors in AI-generated outputs. By 2025, 90 percent of her inquiries related to logos and packaging required corrections of AI-generated content, which accounted for 60 to 70 percent of her annual income. However, the process was exhausting, with clients offering low fees and some projects requiring near-complete redesigns due to the complexity of the errors. Freelance platforms have also reflected this growing demand. On Freelancer.com, which has over 88 million users, the number of listings using terms like “fix AI,” “AI hallucinations,” and “AI errors” increased by 87 percent between August 2025 and June 2026, reaching 10,760. The majority of these were related to graphic design, followed by video editing, proofreading, and content writing. Similarly, on Upwork, the number of orders for fixing AI errors rose by 70 percent, while searches for “cleaning for AI” on Fiverr increased more than twentyfold between 2023 and 2026. According to Matt Barrie, CEO of Freelancer.com, smaller businesses and entrepreneurs using AI often create a preliminary version of their product, only to realize they lack the expertise to refine it for commercial use. While this approach saves money initially, the costs can quickly mount when preparing the final product for real-world application. For many freelancers, correcting AI errors has become a significant source of income. Florida-based illustrator Todd Van Linda started taking such orders in 2023 when his usual work became less stable. He fixes visual noise, improves clarity, and identifies issues such as extra fingers. Australian writer and editor Kym Dunbar says that cleaning up AI content now constitutes about 60 percent of her work. Meanwhile, her income from creating original content has dropped to roughly a third of what it was during the pandemic. The term “cleaning” can be misleading. Multimedia editor Nathan McConnell explains that he removes reflections from videos, corrects robotic voices, and fixes improperly rendered 3D models. For one project, he had to adjust approximately 100 humanoid animal images for tarot cards, each with additional fingers, two left legs, and other errors. Each image took him two to three hours to correct. Some AI-generated products require even more time and effort to refine. In healthcare, the influence of AI is also becoming apparent. Family doctor Rok Ravnikar notes that patients increasingly bring diagnostic suggestions and lists of tests generated by AI tools like chatGPT instead of citing information from online forums. He acknowledges that this is not entirely new, as family doctors have always faced competition from various sources of medical advice, including books, magazines, forums, and search engines. However, AI's confidence in its responses creates a different dynamic. Ravnikar emphasizes that the issue is not whether AI is right or wrong, but rather whom individuals ultimately trust when their health is at stake. AI can provide a comprehensive list of possible conditions, but a family doctor must determine the most likely diagnosis based on the individual patient’s circumstances. This distinction highlights the critical role of human judgment in medical practice. While AI can aid in consultations, it can also complicate them. Patients sometimes arrive with detailed lists of necessary laboratory tests or precise disease explanations, making it harder for doctors to focus on diagnosing the specific condition. Ravnikar recounts instances where AI helped patients articulate their concerns better, allowing for clearer communication. Conversely, he has also encountered cases where AI misled patients into unnecessary fear or incorrect assumptions about their health. As AI continues to evolve, regulatory bodies are beginning to take notice. The European Union has announced stricter regulations targeting AI systems, including those used in consumer-facing applications like chatGPT. These rules aim to ensure transparency, accountability, and ethical use of AI technologies. Such measures could impact how AI-generated content is handled, potentially affecting both the demand for human correction and the broader integration of AI in professional settings. The situation underscores the complex relationship between AI and human creativity. As AI becomes more integrated into daily life, the need for skilled professionals to refine and validate AI outputs will continue to grow. This trend raises questions about the future of work, the value of human expertise, and the evolving roles of both AI and humans in shaping the digital world.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

3 reports

Dnevnik logoDnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 709/2/2026
New professions: AI creates a product in seconds, then a human fixes it for hours

The article discusses the growing trend of 'content cleaning' or fixing errors generated by AI tools like ChatGPT, which has created new work opportunities for creative freelancers but also poses challenges. It highlights the shift in demand from original creative work to error correction, with many designers and content creators now spending significant time revising AI-generated outputs. The piece cites examples such as a Spanish graphic designer who reported that over 90% of her requests related to logos and packaging involved correcting AI-generated content. Data from platforms like Freelancer.com and Upwork show a sharp increase in job postings for AI error fixes, with some categories seeing over 87% growth between August 2025 and June 2026. However, this trend has led to concerns about reduced income for creatives and increased workload, as clients often offer low rates and require extensive revisions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the issue, discussing both the economic implications for freelancers and the broader industry trends. While it highlights challenges faced by creatives, it does not take a clear ideological stance or emphasize any particular political agenda. The framing is客观,

Why factuality (80): This article provides detailed information about the shift in work demands for creative freelancers due to AI tools like ChatGPT. It includes quotes from a graphic designer named Lisa who discusses her experience with increased demand for content correction. The facts are supported by specific examp

Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting both the opportunities and challenges posed by AI in creative work. It uses descriptive language but avoids strong emotional bias, focusing on the professional implications rather than taking an overtly positive or negative stance.

Dnevnik logoDnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 659/2/2026
It's not about whether ChatGPT is right.

Dr. Rok Ravnikar, a family doctor at Zdravstveni dom Kamnik, discusses the increasing trend of patients citing responses from AI tools like ChatGPT during medical consultations. He notes that while these tools provide quick answers, they often give the impression of certainty, which differs from the more nuanced approach of human doctors who consider multiple possibilities. Ravnikar emphasizes that the core issue is not whether AI is accurate but rather who people ultimately trust when their health is at stake. He highlights that AI can be a helpful tool for patients to prepare questions or understand their symptoms better, but it cannot replace the complex decision-making process of a physician.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Dr. Rok Ravnikar's balanced perspective on the role of AI in healthcare, emphasizing neither over-reliance nor outright dismissal of AI tools. It focuses on the implications for patient-doctor relationships and does not take a clear ideological stance.

Why factuality (75): The article discusses the increasing use of AI in medical consultations, citing Dr. Rok Ravnikar’s observations about patients referencing answers from chatbots. It references the broader trend of AI adoption in healthcare and includes direct quotes from a medical professional. While not providing a

Why objectivity (65): The article has a slightly subjective tone when discussing the trust aspect between doctors and patients regarding AI. Phrases like 'ne gre za to, ali ima ChatGPT prav' (it's not about whether ChatGPT is right) imply a value judgment about the reliability of AI versus human expertise, suggesting a s

Svet24 logoSvet24IndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 558/31/2026
Brussels hits after ChatGPT: stricter rules for Slovenians coming too

The article reports that Brussels has imposed stricter regulations on AI technologies like ChatGPT, which could affect Slovenians as well. The focus is on potential new rules that may apply to Slovenia, highlighting concerns over data privacy and ethical use of artificial intelligence. The piece suggests that these regulatory changes might lead to more stringent oversight of AI systems operating within the European Union, including those used by Slovenian entities.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information about EU-level regulation affecting Slovenia without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It focuses on reporting developments rather than taking a clear ideological position, thus maintaining a balanced frame.

Why factuality (65): The article reports on stricter regulations being introduced for Slovenians following Brussels' actions against ChatGPT. However, there is no primary source document to verify this claim directly. The factuality score is based on the cross-source consensus among other articles, which suggest that AI

Why objectivity (55): The tone of the article suggests a critical view towards the impact of AI on creative professions, using emotive language such as 'dvorezen meč' (double-edged sword) and highlighting the stress and financial issues faced by creators. This indicates a somewhat biased perspective rather than a neutral

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories