The article discusses the controversy surrounding the release of video footage from Slovenia's highway surveillance system, DARS, regarding a traffic accident involving President Nataša Pirc Musar. DARS claims there is no legal basis for releasing the specific footage of this incident, despite previously releasing similar videos of other accidents and dangerous situations. The lack of public access to the footage has raised questions about transparency and consistency in DARS' policies. While DARS has historically shared videos of various hazardous driving incidents which gained significant online attention, they now argue that such footage must comply with data protection laws and serve a preventive purpose. The article highlights the discrepancy between past practices and current restrictions, questioning the criteria used to determine which incidents are publicly disclosed.
Bias read (Center): While the article touches on issues related to public figures and governmental oversight, it does not take a clear ideological stance. It presents both the arguments of DARS and the public's expectations, without overtly favoring either side. The focus remains on legal and procedural aspects rather



