ON
← Back to feed
Where's the video of the President's car accident, and how quickly can you tell if she was restrained?
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 hr. ago

Where's the video of the President's car accident, and how quickly can you tell if she was restrained?

The article discusses the controversy surrounding the release of video footage from Slovenia's highway surveillance system, DARS, regarding a traffic accident involving President Nataša Pirc Musar. DARS claims there is no legal basis for releasing the specific footage of this incident, despite previously releasing similar videos of other accidents and dangerous situations. The lack of public access to the footage has raised questions about transparency and consistency in DARS' policies. While DARS has historically shared videos of various hazardous driving incidents which gained significant online attention, they now argue that such footage must comply with data protection laws and serve a preventive purpose. The article highlights the discrepancy between past practices and current restrictions, questioning the criteria used to determine which incidents are publicly disclosed.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Info360 logoInfo360IndependentCenter5 hr. ago
Where's the video of the President's car accident, and how quickly can you tell if she was restrained?

The article discusses the controversy surrounding the release of video footage from Slovenia's highway surveillance system, DARS, regarding a traffic accident involving President Nataša Pirc Musar. DARS claims there is no legal basis for releasing the specific footage of this incident, despite previously releasing similar videos of other accidents and dangerous situations. The lack of public access to the footage has raised questions about transparency and consistency in DARS' policies. While DARS has historically shared videos of various hazardous driving incidents which gained significant online attention, they now argue that such footage must comply with data protection laws and serve a preventive purpose. The article highlights the discrepancy between past practices and current restrictions, questioning the criteria used to determine which incidents are publicly disclosed.

Bias read (Center): While the article touches on issues related to public figures and governmental oversight, it does not take a clear ideological stance. It presents both the arguments of DARS and the public's expectations, without overtly favoring either side. The focus remains on legal and procedural aspects rather

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories